Cited by 49

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Multimodal Neuroimaging Approaches to Disorders of Consciousness

Schiff, Nicholas D.·2006·Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

Abstract

Advances in neuroimaging techniques hold significant promise for improving understanding of disorders of consciousness arising from severe brain injuries. We review neuroimaging studies of the vegetative state (VS) and minimally conscious state (MCS), and findings in an unusual case of late emergence from MCS. Multimodal neuroimaging studies using positron emission tomography techniques, functional magnetic resonance imaging, and quantitative electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography quantify variations of residual cerebral activity across these patient populations. The results suggest models to distinguish the pathophysiologic basis of VS and MCS. Less clear are potential brain mechanisms underlying late recovery of communication in rare MCS patients. Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging studies and recent experimental findings suggest that structural remodeling of the brain following severe injury may play a role in late functional recoveries. More generally, relatively long time courses of recovery following severe brain injury emphasize the need to develop markers for identifying patients who may harbor potential for further meaningful recovery. Introduction of neuroimaging into the clinical evaluation process will require developing frameworks for longitudinal assessments of cerebral function. Although limited in number, available studies already provide important insights into underlying brain mechanisms that may help guide development of such assessment…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001199-200609000-00003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Giacino, 2002, Neurology, 58, 349, 10.1212/WNL.58.3.349 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Laureys, 2004, Lancet Neurol, 3, 537, 10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00852-X · DOI · Paper page
  3. Owen, 2005, Prog Brain Res, 150, 457, 10.1016/S0079-6123(05)50032-3 · DOI
  4. Onofrj, 1997, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 63, 759, 10.1136/jnnp.63.6.759 · DOI
  5. Leon-Carrion, 2002, Brain Inj, 16, 571, 10.1080/02699050110119781 · DOI
  6. Wijdicks, 2001, N Engl J Med, 344, 1215, 10.1056/NEJM200104193441606 · DOI
  7. Kobylarz, 2005, Neuropsychol Rehabil, 15, 323, 10.1080/09602010443000605 · DOI
  8. 1994, N Engl J Med, 30, 1499
  9. Schiff, 2002, Brain, 125, 1210, 10.1093/brain/awf131 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Schiff, 2005, Prog Brain Res, 150, 477
  11. Giacino, 2005, J Head Trauma Rehabil, 20, 30, 10.1097/00001199-200501000-00005 · DOI
  12. Lammi, 2005, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 86, 746, 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.11.004 · DOI
  13. McMillan, 2004, Brain Inj, 18, 935, 10.1080/02699050410001675915 · DOI
  14. Giacino, 2004, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 85, 2020, 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.033 · DOI
  15. Macniven, 2003, Brain Inj, 17, 525, 10.1080/0269905031000086254 · DOI
  16. Menon, 1998, Lancet, 352, 1148, 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)79795-6 · DOI
  17. Adams, 2000, Brain, 123, 1327, 10.1093/brain/123.7.1327 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Jennett, 2001, Neurology, 56, 486, 10.1212/WNL.56.4.486 · DOI
  19. Levy, 1987, Ann Neurol, 22, 673, 10.1002/ana.410220602 · DOI
  20. DeVolder, 1990, Arch Neurol, 47, 197, 10.1001/archneur.1990.00530020103022 · DOI
  21. Tomassino, 1995, J Neurosurg Anesthesiol, 7, 109, 10.1097/00008506-199504000-00006 · DOI
  22. Laureys, 2000, Brain, 123, 1589, 10.1093/brain/123.8.1589 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Laureys, 2002, Neuroimage, 17, 732, 10.1006/nimg.2002.1236 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Schiff, 1999, J Cogn Neurosci, 11, 650, 10.1162/089892999563715 · DOI
  25. Rothstein, 1991, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 79, 101, 10.1016/0013-4694(91)90046-7 · DOI
  26. Boly, 2004, Arch Neurol, 61, 233, 10.1001/archneur.61.2.233 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Boly, 2005, 15, 283
  28. Laureys, 2004, Neurology, 63, 916, 10.1212/01.WNL.0000137421.30792.9B · DOI
  29. Bekinschtein, 2004, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 75, 788, 10.1136/jnnp.2003.034876 · DOI
  30. Schiff, 2005, Neurology, 64, 514, 10.1212/01.WNL.0000150883.10285.44 · DOI
  31. Gusnard, 2001, Nat Rev Neurosci, 2, 685, 10.1038/35094500 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Burruss, 1999, J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci, 11, 100, 10.1176/jnp.11.1.100 · DOI
  33. Clauss, 2001, S Afr Med J, 91, 788
  34. Schiff, 2003, Cerebrum, 5, 7
  35. Voss, 2006, J Clin Invest, 16, 2005, 10.1172/JCI27021 · DOI
  36. Chklovskii, 2004, Nature, 431, 782, 10.1038/nature03012 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Danielsen, 2003, Neuroradiology, 45, 722, 10.1007/s00234-003-1068-z · DOI
  38. Shiel, 2004, Br J Neurosurg, 18, 5, 10.1080/02688690410001660625 · DOI
  39. Crone, 2001, Clin Neurophysiol, 112, 565, 10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00545-9 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Fins, 2004, Arch Neurol, 61, 1354, 10.1001/archneur.61.9.1354 · DOI
  41. Fins, 2003, Nat Rev Neurosci, 4, 323, 10.1038/nrn1079 · DOI
  42. Fins, 2005, Prog Brain Res, 150, 565, 10.1016/S0079-6123(05)50040-2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schiff, N. D.
Venue
Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
Published
2006-09
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
388-397
ISSN
0885-9701
Cited by
49
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review