Cited by 50Craniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsPectus Deformity Diagnosis and TreatmentScoliosis diagnosis and treatment

Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment of Morphology in Sagittal Synostosis: Mid-Sagittal Vector Analysis

Marcus, Jeffrey R., Stokes, Tracey H., Mukundan, Srinivasan, Forrest, Christopher R.·2006·Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Abstract

Consensus remains lacking regarding the optimal surgical treatment modality for sagittal synostosis. There is, however, wide agreement that objective analytical methods are required to demonstrate the characteristic morphology of the condition and to substantiate the benefits of specified surgical techniques. Simple calculated anthropomorphic indices, such as the cranial index, are commonly used but fail to provide satisfactory representation of morphology, which is far more complex than can be represented by its simple length-width ratio. Techniques to provide more comprehensive, yet practical, assessment of morphology are needed for analytic purposes. Herein, we introduce vector analysis as an objective, computed tomography (CT)-based morphometric technique for assessment of cranial morphology; this work represents the first application of the technique mid-sagittal vector analysis (MSVA). MSVA is a single plane application that was devised to address dysmorphology in sagittal synostosis. It was our hypothesis that MSVA would quantitatively and qualitatively depict preoperative morphology and postoperative correction in specific regions. Sixteen patients undergoing cranial reshaping surgery for sagittal synostosis were included in the study. All patients underwent routine preoperative and 1 year postoperative CT scans, from which the MSVA was derived. MSVA is a radial vector analysis in which distances to the cranial surface are measured from a single reference point origin in the sagittal plane. Preoperative morphology, characterized by respective vectors, was analyzed in three regions: the frontal, vertex, and occipital regions. Comparison with postoperative paired data was conducted for each patient. The analysis of postoperative change demonstrated (1) decrease in prominence in the frontal and occipital regions, (2) increase in height and forward translation of the vertex, and (3) ability to distinguish and qualify frontal versus occipital bossing and correction thereof. We conclude that the longitudinal differences associated with scaphocephaly are well characterized and differentiated by MSVA. Quantitative and qualitative assessment identifies three relevant regions affected by the condition and its treatment: the frontal, vertex, and occipital regions. The transverse dimension is not addressed in this single plane analysis; a more comprehensive application will require additional planes of analysis and the development of a normative database.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001665-200607000-00013

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marcus, J. R., Stokes, T. H., Mukundan, S., & Forrest, C. R.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Forrest, Christopher R.
Venue
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2006-07
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
680-686
ISSN
1049-2275 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966739961
Cited by
50
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Craniofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Keywords
sagittal synostosis, craniosynostosis, skull morphology, scaphocephaly, frontal bossing, cranial index, postoperative correction
MeSH terms
Cephalometry, Child, Preschool, Cranial Sutures, Craniosynostoses, Craniotomy, Follow-Up Studies, Forecasting, Frontal Bone, Humans, Infant, Longitudinal Studies, Nasal Bone, Occipital Bone, Parietal Bone, Sella Turcica, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review