Cited by 121Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentTreatment of Major DepressionMental Health Treatment and Access

Recurrence of Major Depressive Disorder in Hospitalized Children and Adolescents

EMSLIE, GRAHAM J., RUSH, A. JOHN, WEINBERG, WARREN A., GULLION, CHRISTINA M., RINTELMANN, JEANNE, HUGHES, CARROLL W.·1997·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the outcome of a sample of children and adolescents hospitalized with major depressive disorder (MDD) and to assess different duration and severity criteria to define recovery and recurrence. Method Fifty-nine of 70 children and adolescents were reevaluated 1 to 5 years later, and the intervening course of depression and other disorders was assessed using the Kiddie-Longitudinal interval Follow-up Evaluation (K-LIFE). Results Ninety-eight percent of subjects had recovered from their index MDD episode within 1 year of their initial evaluation, but 61% had at least one recurrence during the follow-up period. Of those with recurrences, 47.2% had a recurrence within 1 year and 69.4% by 2 years from the offset of the index episode. Changing the criteria for recovery by increasing the length of time required to define recovery resulted in decreases in the number of episodes of recurrence reported. Conclusion MDD in children and adolescents is often an episodic disorder. Difference in definitions of recovery and recurrence affect the data reported. Consistent definitions of remission, recovery, relapse, and recurrence are needed. These data suggest that recovery may be defined after two consecutive months without symptoms and that episodes of MDD may be briefer, but more frequent, in children and adolescents than in adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004583-199706000-00015

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
EMSLIE, G. J., RUSH, A. J., WEINBERG, W. A., GULLION, C. M., RINTELMANN, J., & HUGHES, C. W.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Children's Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
EMSLIE, GRAHAM J.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-06
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
785-792
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084952860
Cited by
121
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • NIMH (MH 39188)
  • the Mental Health Clinical Research Center (MH41115)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
major depressive disorder, childhood depression, adolescent depression, recurrence, recovery, remission, relapse, hospitalized children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Psychiatry, Child, Hospitalized, Depressive Disorder, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Prognosis, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review