Cited by 205Problem Solving Skills DevelopmentChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeFamily Support in Illness

Problem-solving skills training for mothers of children with newly diagnosed cancer: a randomized trial.

SAHLER, OLLE JANE Z., VARNI, JAMES W., FAIRCLOUGH, DIANE L., BUTLER, ROBERT W., NOLL, ROBERT B., DOLGIN, MICHAEL J., PHIPPS, SEAN, COPELAND, DONNA R. +2 more·2002·Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics

Abstract

Mothers of children with serious illnesses have lower levels of well-being than mothers in the general population. Problem-solving therapy (PST), a cognitive-behavioral intervention, has been shown to be effective in treating negative affectivity (depression, anxiety) and other manifestations of reduced well-being. This report describes a problem-solving skills training (PSST) intervention, based on problem-solving therapy, for mothers of newly diagnosed pediatric cancer patients. Ninety-two mothers were randomly assigned to receive PSST or to receive standard psychosocial care (Control Group). After the 8-week intervention, mothers in the PSST Group had significantly enhanced problem-solving skills and significantly decreased negative affectivity compared with controls. Analysis revealed that changes in self-reports of problem-solving behaviors accounted for 40% of the difference in mood scores between the two groups. Interestingly, PSST had the greatest impact on improving constructive problem solving, whereas improvement in mood was most influenced by decreases in dysfunctional problem solving. The implications of these findings for refinement of the PSST intervention and for extension to other groups of children with serious illnesses are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004703-200204000-00003

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SAHLER, O. J. Z., VARNI, J. W., FAIRCLOUGH, D. L., BUTLER, R. W., NOLL, R. B., DOLGIN, M. J., PHIPPS, S., COPELAND, D. R., KATZ, E. R., & MULHERN, R. K.
Affiliations
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics
Published
2002-04
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
77-86
ISSN
0196-206X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047213772
Cited by
205
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 15
FWCI
27.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R25CA065520, R25 CA65520)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Problem Solving Skills Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
problem-solving training, problem-solving therapy, mothers of children with cancer, childhood cancer, parental well-being, negative affectivity, depression, anxiety, constructive problem solving, mood, psychosocial interventions
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Affective Symptoms, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Mother-Child Relations, Mothers, Neoplasms, Patient Education as Topic, Problem Solving, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review