Cited by 35Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeFamily Support in IllnessCancer survivorship and care

Psychosocial intervention programs for parents of children with cancer: A systematic review and critical comparison of programs’ models and development

Ogez, David, Péloquin, Katherine, Bertout, Laurence, Bourque, Claude-Julie, Curnier, Daniel, Drouin, Simon, Laverdière, Caroline, Marcil, Valérie +5 more·2019·Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings

Abstract

Intervention programs have been developed to help parents cope with their child's cancer. Despite some studies reporting a high level of evidence, it is unclear how these programs build on each other. Appraising models of change is critical to advance scientific knowledge and provide evidence-based interventions. This review aims to identify existing programs, explicitly formulate their underlying models, evaluate how they translate into concrete activities, as well as identify and discuss their development process. Eleven programs based on models of change from cognitive-behavioral, systemic and counselling theories were identified. Many models included a sound theoretical framework, targeted outcomes, as well as implementation strategies. In most cases, preliminary development studies were conducted, but details were rarely provided on how development stages informed the redesign of intervention programs. Acceptability and treatment fidelity were not available for one-third of the programs. Future reports should document the development and design redesign stages prior to conducting efficacy trials, as this step would provide crucial details to critically appraise programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10880-019-09612-8

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ogez, D., Péloquin, K., Bertout, L., Bourque, C.-J., Curnier, D., Drouin, S., Laverdière, C., Marcil, V., Ribeiro, R., Callaci, M., Rondeau, E., Sinnett, D., & Sultan, S.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine (CA)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Ogez, David
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
Published
2019-02-26
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
550-574
ISSN
  • 1068-9583 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3572
OpenAlex
W2917193374
Cited by
35
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé
  • Charles Bruneau Cancer Center Foundation
  • CHU Sainte-Justine Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
psychosocial interventions, parents of children with cancer, childhood cancer, change models, intervention development, cognitive behavioral therapy, systemic therapy, counseling, program acceptability, intervention fidelity
MeSH terms
Psychological Distress, Adaptation, Psychological, Child, Counseling, Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Parents, Stress, Psychological, Program Evaluation, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Program Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review