Cited by 73Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsTeratomas and Epidermoid Cysts

MR Appearance of Umbilical Endometriosis

Yu, Chin-Yin, Perez-Reyes, Maria, Brown, Jeffrey J., Borrello, Joseph A.·1994·Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We describe the MR appearance of endometriosis involving the umbilicus in two patients. One patient had a history of laparoscopy performed through the umbilicus; the other had an umbilical hernia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR imaging was performed using both a body coil and a spine coil (with the patient lying prone on the spine coil). The lesions were surgically removed and their MR appearance was correlated with the results of histologic analysis. RESULTS: The lesions were well delineated on MRI and showed evidence of prior hemorrhage consistent with endometriosis. Both lesions were shown to be endometriosis at surgical pathology. CONCLUSION: MR imaging was useful for delineating the size and location of the lesions and excluding intraabdominal extension.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004728-199403000-00019

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several case reports and a few cohorts, up to eight patients, using MR imaging in AWE have been described.

    “At this moment, to our knowledge, several case reports and a few cohorts, up to eight patients using MR imaging in AWE, have been described in the literature [1, 7, 14–17].”

    From Appearance of abdominal wall endometriosis on MR imaging (2010) · cites this paper as [17]

  • In these studies, endometriosis appeared homogeneously hypointense or isointense, or heterogeneous with focal areas of high and low signal intensity, suggesting old haemorrhage or fibrosis on T2-weighted and T1-weighted fat-suppressed imaging.

    “In these studies, endometriosis appeared homogeneously hypointense or isointense, or heterogeneous with focal areas of high and low signal intensity, suggesting old haemorrhage or fibrosis on T2-weighted and T1-weighted fat-suppressed imaging.”

    From Appearance of abdominal wall endometriosis on MR imaging (2010) · cites this paper as [17]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, C.-Y., Perez-Reyes, M., Brown, J. J., & Borrello, J. A.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
Published
1994-03
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
269-271
ISSN
0363-8715 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986773747
Cited by
72
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Teratomas and Epidermoid Cysts
Keywords
umbilical endometriosis, magnetic resonance imaging, MRI appearance, umbilical hernia, lesion delineation, surgical pathology correlation
MeSH terms
Adult, Cicatrix, Endometriosis, Female, Hernia, Umbilical, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Laparoscopy, Umbilicus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review