Cited by 55Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsHeterotopic Ossification and Related Conditions

Abdominal wall endometriosis: an update in clinical, imagistic features, and management options

Open access
Grigore, Mihaela, Socolov, Demetra, Pavaleanu, Ioana, Scripcariu, Ioana, Grigore, Ana Maria, Micu, Romeo·2017·Medical Ultrasonography

Abstract

Abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE) is a rare condition defined by the presence of endometrial tissue in the subcutaneous fatty layer and the muscles of the abdominal wall. It is usually caused by the dissemination of endometrial tissue in the wound at the time of obstetrical and gynecological surgeries. AWE is rare and difficult to diagnose. The most frequent clinical presentation is that of a palpable subcutaneous mass near surgical scars associated with cyclic pain and swelling during menses. AWE may be an underreported pathology partly because it has scarcely received attention in the radiologic literature. Its frequency is expected to rise along with the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries; thus, it is important that physicians or sonographers are familiar with this pathology. The purpose of our review is to present the latest data regarding risk factors, clinical and imagisticfindings, and management of AWE.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.11152/mu-1248

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Meyer R. Adenomatous proliferation of the serosa in an ab- dominal scar. Z Geburtsh Gynak 1903;49:32-41.
  2. Firilas A, Soi A, Max M. Abdominal incision endometrio- mas. Am Surg 1994;60:259-261.
  3. Dwivedi AJ, Agrawal SN, Silva YJ. Abdominal wall endo- metriomas. Dig Dis Sci 2002;47:456-461.
  4. Vellido-Cotelo R, Muñoz-González JL, Oliver-Pérez MR, et al. Endometriosis node in gynaecologic scars: a study of 17 patients andthe diagnostic considera- tions in clinical experience in tertiary care center. BMC Womens Health 2015;15:13.
  5. Vuksic T, Rastovic P, Dragisic V. Abdominal Wall Endo- metrioma after Laparoscopic Operation of Uterine Endo- metriosis. Case Rep Surg 2016;2016:5843179.
  6. Bektaş H, Bilsel Y, Sari YS, et al. Abdomi nal wall endome- trioma; a 10-year experience and brief review of the litera- ture. J Surg Res 2010;164:e77-e81.
  7. Ahn SE, Park SJ, Moon SK, Lee DH, Lim JW. Sonography of Abdominal Wall Masses and Masslike Lesions: Correla- tion With Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J Ultrasound Med 2016;35:189-208.
  8. Haim N, Shapiro-Feinberg M, Zissin R. Incisional endome- triomas: CT findings. Emerg Radiol 2005;11:162-163.
  9. Fulciniti F, Caleo A, Lepore M, Fortunato A, Vetrani A, Pal- ombini L. Fine needle cytology of endometriosis: experi- ence with 10 cases. Acta Cytol 2005;49:495-499.
  10. Kim JY, Kwon JE, Kim HJ, Park K. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of abdominal wall endometriosis: a study of 10 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 2013;41:115-119.
  11. Sergent F, Baron M, Le Cornec JB, Scotté M, Mace P, Mar- peau L. Malignant transformation of abdominal wall endo- metriosis: a new case report. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2006;35:186-190.
  12. Fargas Fàbregas F, Cusidó Guimferrer M, Tresserra Ca- sas F, Baulies Caballero S, Fábregas Xauradó R. Malig- nant transformation of abdominal wall endometriosis with lymph node metastasis: Case report and review of litera- ture. Gynecol Oncol Case Rep 2014;8:10-13.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grigore, M., Socolov, D., Pavaleanu, I., Scripcariu, I., Grigore, A. M., & Micu, R.
Affiliations
  • Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO)
  • Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO)
Venue
Medical Ultrasonography
Published
2017-11-29
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
430
ISSN
  • 1844-4172 (ISSN-L)
  • 2066-8643
OpenAlex
W2767095911
Cited by
55
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Ultrasonography (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Heterotopic Ossification and Related Conditions
Keywords
abdominal wall endometriosis, cesarean section, postoperative complications, cyclic pain, risk factors, diagnostic imaging, management
MeSH terms
Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Ultrasonography, Abdominal Wall

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review