Cited by 31Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Spontaneous abdominal wall endometriosis: a case report

Papavramidis, T.H.S., Sapalidis, K., Michalopoulos, N., Karayanopoulou, G., Raptou, G., Tzioufa, V., Kesisoglou, I., Papavramidis, S.T.·2009·Acta Chirurgica Belgica

Abstract

Endometriosis is the presence of endometrial glands and stroma outside the uterus. Spontaneous abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE) is any ectopic endometrium found superficial to the peritoneum without the presence of any previous scar. Rarely, endometriosis represents a disease of specific interest to the general surgeon, on account of its extrapelvic localisations. We describe a case with spontaneous AWE presenting as a painful mass with cyclic symptoms. A 28-year-old woman presented to the day-surgery division of our department, suffering from a painful mass in the left lower abdominal quadrant. A mobile mass of 5 x 4 cm was identified. The initial diagnosis was lipoma and excision was planned. During the operation two masses were spotted, very close to one another, and were excised within healthy limits. Pathology revealed endometrial glands surrounded by a disintegrating mantle of endometrial stroma and fibrous scar tissue in which there was a scattering of leucocytes. The woman had no scars. She was discharged from hospital after 2 hours. Two years after the excision she is free of disease and no recurrence has been observed. Spontaneous AWE is rare, accounting for 20% of all AWEs. The triad ; mass, pain and cyclic symptomatology helps in the diagnosis, but unfortunately it is not present in all cases. Spontaneous endometriomas are usually diagnosed by pathology and the treatment of choice is surgical excision.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00015458.2009.11680536

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papavramidis, T. H. S., Sapalidis, K., Michalopoulos, N., Karayanopoulou, G., Raptou, G., Tzioufa, V., Kesisoglou, I., & Papavramidis, S. T.
Affiliations
  • 3 Department of Surgery
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
  • Department of Pathology AHEPA University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Venue
Acta Chirurgica Belgica
Published
2009-01
Volume
109
Issue
6
Pages
778-781
ISSN
  • 0001-5458 (ISSN-L)
  • 2577-0160
OpenAlex
W2346228002
Cited by
31
References
29
Citations by year
2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta chirurgica Belgica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
abdominal wall endometriosis, spontaneous endometriosis, ectopic endometrium, surgical excision, lipoma misdiagnosis, extrapelvic endometriosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Endometriosis, Endometrium, Female, Humans, Abdominal Wall

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review