Cited by 23Body Composition Measurement TechniquesElectrical and Bioimpedance TomographyObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Predictive accuracy of BIA equations for estimating fat-free mass of black men

WAGNER, DALE R., HEYWARD, VIVIAN H., KOCINA, PAULA S., STOLARCZYK, LISA M., WILSON, WENDY L.·1997·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

This study assessed the predictive accuracy of previously published bioelectrical impedence analysis (BIA) equations in estimating the fat-free mass (FFM) of black men, 19 to 50 years. The reference method was hydrostatic weighing (HW) at residual lung volume. Body density (Db) was converted to relative body fat (%BF) for calculation of FFMHW using the Schutte et al. equation. Resistance and reactance were measured with a Valhalla bioimpedance analyzer. Age-specific, generalized, and fatness-specific BIA equations were cross validated using regression analysis. The Segal fatness-specific equations were modified using a method recommended by Stolarczyk. All of the equations significantly (P < 0.05) underestimated the average reference measure of FFMHW. However, the underestimation of FFM for the modified Segal fatness-specific equation was relatively small (-1.8 kg) and not likely to have much clinical significance. Furthermore, this equation had a high correlation with reference FFMHW (ry,y' = 0.97), low prediction errors (SEE = 2.1 kg; E = 2.7 kg), and accurately estimated the FFM within +/- 3.5 kg for 78% of the individuals in the sample. Thus, we recommend using the modified fatness-specific BIA equation for estimating the FFM of black men.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005768-199707000-00018

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Bland, 1986, Lancet, 307, 310
  2. Cohn, 1977, Am J Physiol, 232, E419
  3. Deurenberg, 1988, Eur J Clin Nutr, 42, 1017
  4. Motley, 1957, Am Rev Tuberculosis Pulm Dis, 76, 601
  5. Stout, 1994, J Strength Condit Res, 8, 243
  6. Van Loan, 1987, Hum Biol, 59, 299
  7. Vickery, 1988, Hum Biol, 60, 135
  8. Wilmore, 1980, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 12, 216

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
WAGNER, D. R., HEYWARD, V. H., KOCINA, P. S., STOLARCZYK, L. M., & WILSON, W. L.
Affiliations
University of New Mexico (US)
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
1997-07
Volume
29
Issue
7
Pages
969-974
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034936811
Cited by
23
References
25
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
bioelectrical impedance analysis, fat-free mass, Black men, underestimation, prediction accuracy, hydrostatic weighing, body composition, resistance and reactance
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Composition, Densitometry, Humans, Male, Mathematical Computing, Middle Aged, Reproducibility of Results, Electric Impedance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review