Cited by 77Body Composition Measurement TechniquesIndigenous Health and EducationObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Body composition in Pima Indians: validation of bioelectrical resistance

Open access
Rising, R, Swinburn, B, Larson, K, Ravussin, E·1991·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

To assess the validity of bioelectrical resistance (BR) in an obese population, body composition was determined by both hydrostatic weighing and by BR in 156 Pima Indian volunteers representing a wide range of body weight (46.1-202.6 kg) and body composition (11-52% fat). A predictive equation was derived by use of data on height, BR, weight, age, and sex from 130 randomly selected volunteers and was applied to the remaining 26 volunteers. When compared with the manufacturer's software, the new equation increased correlations with hydrostatic weighing for predicting percent body fat and fat-free mass (FFM) from 0.70 to 0.92 and 0.79 to 0.97, respectively. The manufacturer's software underestimated FFM by 5.3 +/- 8.6 kg (P less than 0.05) when compared with FFM derived from hydrostatic weighing whereas the new equation improved the accuracy to -0.1 +/- 3.3 kg (NS). There were no significant effects of fluid intake (700 mL) or breakfast consumption on body composition as determined by BR. BR represents a simple and accurate way to assess body composition in Pima Indians with our newly derived equation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/53.3.594

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 12 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Nyboer, 1940, Radiocardiograms— the electrical impedance changes of the heart in relation to electrocardiograms and heart sounds., J Clin Invest, 19, 963
  2. Thomasett, 1962, Bioelectrical properties of tissue impedance., Lyon Med, 207, 107
  3. Nyboer, 1983, Nontraumatic electrical detection of total body water and density in man., Med Jadertina, 15, 381
  4. Fishman, 1982, A statistical evaluation of multiplicate congruential generators with modulus (231-l)., J Am Stat Assoc, 77, 129
  5. Stump, 1987, Bioelectric impedance variability with dehydration and exercise., Med Sci Sports Exerc, 20, S82

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rising, R., Swinburn, B., Larson, K., & Ravussin, E.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Rising, R
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-03
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
594-598
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2113981180
Cited by
77
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Health and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
body composition, Pima Indians, obesity, fat-free mass, body fat percentage, hydrostatic weighing, prediction equations, validation
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Adult, Arizona, Body Composition, Body Weight, Drinking, Eating, Electric Conductivity, Female

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review