Cited by 274Body Composition Measurement TechniquesBone health and osteoporosis researchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Density of lean body mass is greater in blacks than in whites

Schutte, J. E., Townsend, E. J., Hugg, J., Shoup, R. F., Malina, R. M., Blomqvist, C. G.·1984·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

Previous studies have reported that Blacks have 10–20% more bone mineral than Whites of the same height. Theoretically, this should mean that the lean body mass of Blacks is denser than that of Whites, such that formulas for calculating lean body mass from density in Whites will overestimate the lean body mass (and thus underestimate fatness) in Blacks. To determine if the lean body mass of Blacks is indeed denser than that of Whites, we measured density, total body water, and anthropometric dimensions in 19 white and 15 black male college students. The black and white cohorts were nearly identical in height, weight, and total body water. Among the Whites there was no significant difference between the observed density and that predicted from anthropometry, nor were there any significant differences between the dimensions of body composition calculated from total body water and from observed density. Among the Blacks, however, the observed density was significantly greater than that predicted from anthropometry, and the lean body mass calculated from observed density was significantly greater than that calculated from total body water. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the lean body mass of the Blacks is denser than that of the Whites. Separate formulas should therefore be used for converting density to body composition. Based on our data, the correct formula for Blacks is: %fat = 100 X [(4.374/density) - 3.928]. This formula indicates a lean body density of 1.113 g/cm3 in Blacks compared with 1.100 in Whites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jappl.1984.56.6.1647

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Body composition differences exist between ethnic groups and could affect BIA accuracy.

    “Studies have shown that body composition differ-ences exist between ethnic groups (5) that could affect the accuracy of BIA measurement.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schutte, J. E., Townsend, E. J., Hugg, J., Shoup, R. F., Malina, R. M., & Blomqvist, C. G.
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
1984-06-01
Volume
56
Issue
6
Pages
1647-1649
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
OpenAlex
W2179880609
Cited by
274
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
racial differences, body composition, total body water, anthropometry, body fat percentage
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Adolescent, Adult, Body Composition, Body Water, Densitometry, Humans, Male, Black People, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review