Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 456

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An evaluation of three self-report physical activity instruments for older adults

HARADA, NANCY D., CHIU, VICKI, KING, ABBY C., STEWART, ANITA L.·2001·Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
DOI 10.1097/00005768-200106000-00016
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the known-groups and construct validity of measures from the CHAMPS Physical Activity Questionnaire, Physical Activity Survey for the Elderly (PASE), and the Yale Physical Activity Survey (YPAS). METHODS: The three questionnaires were administered to a convenience sample of older adults (N = 87) recruited from community centers and retirement homes. Validation measures included the SF-36 measures of physical functioning, general health, mental health, and pain; body mass index; performance-based tests of lower body functioning and endurance; and Mini-Logger activity monitor data from ankle and waist sensors. Validity was estimated by testing hypotheses about associations between physical activity and validation measures. RESULTS: As hypothesized, differences in activity levels on all measures were found between older adults in retirement homes (less active) and community centers (more active) (P-values < 0.0001). Correlations of physical activity measures with performance-based measures ranged from 0.44 to 0.68, conforming to hypotheses; hypotheses regarding associations with the SF-36 measures were also confirmed. Body mass index was not correlated with any of the physical activity measures, contrary to hypotheses. Correlations of physical activity measures with Mini-Logger counts ranged from 0.36 to 0.59 (ankle) and 0.42 to 0.61 (waist) as hypothesized. Correlations among the measures from the three instruments ranged from 0.58 to 0.68. CONCLUSIONS: The PASE, YPAS, and CHAMPS each demonstrated acceptable validity, as all measures met nearly all hypotheses. Higher validity coefficients were found for subgroups (men, 65-74 yr, retirement home), suggesting that these instruments may perform better for certain segments of the older adult population.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005768-200106000-00016

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Caspersen, 1991, Am J Epidemiol, 133, 1078, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115821 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Dipietro, 1993, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 25, 628, 10.1249/00005768-199305000-00016 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Folstein, 1975, J Psychiatr Res, 12, 189, 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Garrow, 1985, Int J Obes, 9, 147
  5. Harada, 1999, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 80, 837, 10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90236-8 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Jacobs, 1993, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 25, 81, 10.1249/00005768-199301000-00012 · DOI · Paper page
  7. King, 2000, Ann Behav Med, 22, 42
  8. King, 1999, Ann Behav Med, 21, S65
  9. King, 2000, J Gerontol Med Sci, 55A, M74
  10. King, 1998, Am J Prev Med, 15, 316, 10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00085-3 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Kromhout, 1988, Am J Clin Nutr, 47, 668, 10.1093/ajcn/47.4.668 · DOI
  12. Marcus, 1997, Prev Med, 26, 382, 10.1006/pmed.1997.0158 · DOI
  13. Martin, 1999, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 31, 627, 10.1097/00005768-199905000-00001 · DOI
  14. Paeratakul, 1998, Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord, 22, 424, 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800603 · DOI
  15. Starling, 1999, J Appl Physiol, 86, 2090, 10.1152/jappl.1999.86.6.2090 · DOI
  16. Stewart, 1997, Ann Behav Med, 19, 353, 10.1007/BF02895154 · DOI
  17. Voorrips, 1991, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 23, 974, 10.1249/00005768-199108000-00015 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Washburn, 1999, J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 39, 336
  19. Washburn, 1999, J Clin Epidemiol, 52, 643, 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00049-9 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Washburn, 1993, J Clin Epidemiol, 46, 153, 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90053-4 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Young, 1999, J Am Geriatr Soc, 47, 277, 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb02989.x · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
HARADA, N. D., CHIU, V., KING, A. C., & STEWART, A. L.
Venue
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2001-06
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
962-970
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1097/00005768-200106000-00016
OpenAlex
W2078162205
Cited by
456
References
3
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.