Cited by 135Child Abuse and TraumaIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

Impact of Sexual and Physical Abuse Dimensions on Health Status: Development of an Abuse Severity Measure

Leserman, Jane, Li, Zhiming, Drossman, Douglas A., Toomey, Timothy C., Nachman, Ginette, Glogau, Louise·1997·Psychosomatic Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite the abundant literature showing a relationship of sexual and/or physical abuse history with poor health status, few studies provide evidence about which dimensions of abuse may have a worse impact on health. In female patients with gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, the present study aims to identify which dimensions of abuse history (eg, number of perpetrators, injury) might predict poor current health status, in order to develop an empirically based severity of abuse measure. METHODS: Of a sample of 239 female patients from a referral gastroenterology clinic, this paper primarily focuses on 121 women with a past history of contact sexual abuse (N = 99), and/or life threatening physical abuse (N = 68). RESULTS: Among those with a sexual abuse history, 24% of current health status was explained by serious injury during abuse (p = .0006), victimization by multiple perpetrators (p = .03), and being raped (p = .09). Among the physically abused, rape (in addition to life threat) (p = .0001), and multiple life-threatening incidents (p = .002) explained 39% of the variance in overall health. Among the women with a sexual and/or physical abuse history, the experience of rape, serious injury during sexual abuse, and multiple life-threatening incidents explained one fourth of the variance in current health status. Based on these three dimensions of abuse, we created an abuse severity measure which explained about one fourth of the variance in health status among the subgroup with abuse history, and among the entire clinic sample. CONCLUSIONS: Given the high prevalence of abuse in referral practice, and the potential health impact of previous abuse, it is important that history taking include details concerning the abuse experience. The severity of abuse measure developed in this paper should prove useful for both research and clinical practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00006842-199703000-00007

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leserman, J., Li, Z., Drossman, D. A., Toomey, T. C., Nachman, G., & Glogau, L.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Psychosomatic Medicine
Published
1997
Volume
59
Issue
2
Pages
152-160
ISSN
0033-3174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011066047
Cited by
135
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychosomatic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh046959-04)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH46959)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
child sexual abuse, physical abuse, health status, gastrointestinal diseases, women, rape, multiple perpetrators, psychosomatic symptoms
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Child Abuse, Child Abuse, Sexual, Female, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Health Status, Humans, Life Change Events, Middle Aged, Personality Development, Psychophysiologic Disorders, Rape

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review