Cited by 547Mental Health via WritingSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesPoetry Analysis and Criticism

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Word Use in the Poetry of Suicidal and Nonsuicidal Poets

Wiltsey Stirman, Shannon, Pennebaker, James W.·2001·Psychosomatic Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether distinctive features of language could be discerned in the poems of poets who committed suicide and to test two suicide models by use of a text-analysis program. METHOD: Approximately 300 poems from the early, middle, and late periods of nine suicidal poets and nine nonsuicidal poets were compared by use of the computer text analysis program, Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC). Language use within the poems was analyzed within the context of two suicide models. RESULTS: In line with a model of social integration, writings of suicidal poets contained more words pertaining to the individual self and fewer words pertaining to the collective than did those of nonsuicidal poets. In addition, the direction of effects for words pertaining to communication was consistent with the social integration model of suicide. CONCLUSIONS: The study found support for a model that suggests that suicidal individuals are detached from others and are preoccupied with self. Furthermore, the findings suggest that linguistic predictors of suicide can be discerned through text analysis.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00006842-200107000-00001

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hoyle, 1968, Lit Psychol, 18, 187
  2. Long, 1993, Lit Psychol, 39, 26
  3. Giles, 1987, Communication Yearbook, 10, 13

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wiltsey Stirman, S., & Pennebaker, J. W.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Psychosomatic Medicine
Published
2001-07
Volume
63
Issue
4
Pages
517-522
ISSN
0033-3174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082556623
Cited by
547
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 24
FWCI
10.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychosomatic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH052391, MH52391)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Poetry Analysis and Criticism
Keywords
suicide, poetry, self-absorption, communication, LIWC, text analysis, language use
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Ego, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Middle Aged, Poetry as Topic, Psycholinguistics, Semantics, Social Isolation, Suicide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review