Cited by 82Mental Health via WritingSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesDigital Communication and Language

Writing Characteristics of Suicidal People on the Internet: A Psychological Investigation of Emerging Social Environments

Barak, Azy, Miron, Ofra·2005·Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior

Abstract

Three studies were carried out to investigate the writings of suicidal people on the Internet, hypothesizing consistent findings to equivalent research of offline writing. In Study 1, suicidal persons' (n = 34) attributions as the cause of their condition, as expressed in their free online writing, were compared to those of emotionally distressed, nonsuicidal (n = 16) and to nondistressed (n = 15) individuals. Results showed that suicidal persons have significantly more stable and global attributions than do the other groups. In Study 2, expressions of self-focus in online written messages were compared among suicidal, two levels of nonsuicidal but distressed, and nondistressed individuals (200 messages in each group). With the use of various expressions of self-focus, findings showed that suicidal people were distinctively self-focused in their writing, unlike their counterparts. In Study 3, psychologically relevant themes in the online writing of suicidal (n = 39) and highly distressed, nonsuicidal persons (n = 24) were compared. Results revealed that the former expressed significantly more unbearable psychological pain and cognitive constriction than did the latter. The findings of the three studies are consistent with those found in examinations of offline writing. The research has important implications for the use of online environments for psychological research and means for assessment, as well as for understanding suicidality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/suli.2005.35.5.507

Cites

109 of 109 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Writing style could help detect suicidal youth via online platforms through identification of internal attribution, excessive self-focus and higher psychological pain and cognitive constriction.

    “Writing style could help detect suicidal youth via online platforms through identification of: internal attribution, excessive self-focus and higher psychological pain and cognitive constriction [46].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 111 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barak, A., & Miron, O.
Affiliations
University of Haifa (IL)
Corresponding author
Barak, Azy
Venue
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-10
Volume
35
Issue
5
Pages
507-524
ISSN
  • 0363-0234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-278X
OpenAlex
W2072293237
Cited by
82
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Digital Communication and Language
Keywords
suicidal ideation, online writing, attributional style, self-focus, emotional distress, psychological suffering, online social environments, suicide assessment
MeSH terms
Communication, Depression, Humans, Life Change Events, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Environment, Social Support, Suicide, Attempted, Verbal Behavior, Reproducibility of Results, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review