Cited by 518Mental Health via WritingAuthorship Attribution and ProfilingAging and Gerontology Research

Words of wisdom: Language use over the life span

Pennebaker, James W., Stone, Lori D.·2003·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Two projects explored the links between language use and aging. In the first project, written or spoken text samples from disclosure studies from over 3,000 research participants from 45 different studies representing 21 laboratories in 3 countries were analyzed to determine how people change in their use of 14 text dimensions as a function of age. A separate project analyzed the collected works of 10 well-known novelists, playwrights, and poets who lived over the last 500 years. Both projects found that with increasing age, individuals use more positive and fewer negative affect words, use fewer self-references, use more future-tense and fewer past-tense verbs, and demonstrate a general pattern of increasing cognitive complexity. Implications for using language as a marker of personality among current and historical texts are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.291

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Older individuals use more positive emotion and less negative emotion words, prefer fewer self-references, and stylistically there is less use of negation.

    “For age, the most salient findings include older individuals using more positive emotion and less negative emotion words [30], older individuals preferring fewer self-references (i.e. ‘I’, ‘me’) [30], [31], and stylistically there is less use of negation [37].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pennebaker, J. W., & Stone, L. D.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • The Harris Poll (United States) (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2003
Volume
85
Issue
2
Pages
291-301
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W1979230891
Cited by
518
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 22
FWCI
11.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH052391, MH52391)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
language use, aging, lifespan development, self-reference, tense, cognitive complexity, historical texts, literary works
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Child, Female, Humans, Language, Linguistics, Male, Middle Aged, Self Disclosure, Writing, Knowledge, Life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review