Cited by 200Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsRetinal and Macular SurgeryRetinal Imaging and Analysis

Clinicopathologic correlation of drusen and retinal pigment epithelial abnormalities in age-related macular degeneration

BRESSLER, NEIL M., SILVA, JUAN C., BRESSLER, SUSAN B., FINE, STUART L., GREEN, W RICHARD·1994·Retina

Abstract

Background: Clinicopathologic studies of eyes lead to a better understanding of the nature of the ophthalmoscopic and fluorescein angiographic features of drusen. A study was conducted to provide clinicopathologic correlation of drusen and present a classification of drusen based on clinical and histopathologic features. Methods: The macular areas of three eyes from two patients were serially sectioned and studied, and features were depicted in a two-dimensional map and compared with clinical findings. Results: All three tyes had large drusen (>63 µm) with soft morphologic characteristics (poorly demarcated borders) documented on fundus photographs. In both eyes from one patient, these large drusen corresponded to areas of focal retinal pigment epithelium hypopigmentation overlying Bruch's membrane, which was diffusely thickened throughout the macula. Similar findings were noted in another eye from a second patient, and additionally, where there was relatively marked fluorescein staining of large drusen on the late phase of an angiogram, the pathologic correlation demonstrated detachment of the thickened inner aspect of Bruch's membrane from the remainder of Bruch's membrane. Focal hyperpigmentation corresponded to areas of hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium and to clusters of pigmented cells in the subretinal space and outer nuclear area. Conclusion: Diffuse thickening of the inner aspect of Bruch's membrane is associated with retinal pigment epithelial hypopigmentation, focal atrophy, and soft (large) drusen formation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00006982-199414020-00006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Soft drusen are often large and are associated with the detachment of the retinal pigment epithelium and diffusely abnormal Bruch's membrane alterations.

    “Soft drusen are often large and are associated with the detachment of the retinal pigment epithelium and diffusely abnormal Bruch’s membrane alterations.122,124”

    From Age-related macular degeneration (2008) · cites this paper as [124]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BRESSLER, N. M., SILVA, J. C., BRESSLER, S. B., FINE, S. L., & GREEN, W. R.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
  • BRESSLER, NEIL M.
  • BRESSLER, SUSAN B.
  • FINE, STUART L.
Venue
Retina
Published
1994
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
130-142
ISSN
0275-004X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4234378667
Cited by
200
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Retina (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal and Macular Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Keywords
drusen, age-related macular degeneration, retinal pigment epithelium, retinal pigment epithelium atrophy, clinicopathological correlation, outer nuclear layer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review