Cited by 344Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPsychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Understanding the Relevance of Measured Change Through Studies of Responsiveness

Beaton, Dorcas E.·2000·Spine

DOI 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00015

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

From the Institute for Work and Health, Department of Occupational Therapy, and Clinical Epidemiology and Health Services Research Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Address reprint requests to Dorcas E. Beaton, BScOT, MSc, PhD Institute for Work & Health 250 Bloor St., Suite 702 Toronto, ON, M4W 1E6 Canada E-mail: [email protected] DB was supported by a PhD Fellowship (health research) from the Medical Research Council of Canada during the period of this research. This work was also supported in part by the Institute for Work and Health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00015

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

A Study of the Natural History of Back Pain: Part I
ROLAND, M., & MORRIS, R. (1983) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-198303000-00004 · Cited by 3,395 · cited 1×
“Roland observed a median change of 7 points in patients receiving care for low back pain.(56) What should be expected when patients say they are better? On average, the change score in groups of patients whose conditions were deemed to have improved Table 2.”
Background
Effect Sizes for Interpreting Changes in Health Status
Kazis, L. E., Anderson, J. J., & Meenan, R. F. (1989) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198903001-00015 · Cited by 2,401
Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model
Sprangers, M. A. G., & Schwartz, C. E. (1999) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00045-3 · Cited by 2,228
Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?
McHorney, C. A., & Tarlov, A. R. (1995) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/bf01593882 · Cited by 2,206
Outcome Measures for Low Back Pain Research: A Proposal for Standardized Use
Deyo, R. A., Battie, M., Beurskens, A. J. H. M., Bombardier, C., Croft, P., Koes, B., Malmivaara, A., Roland, M., Von Korff, M., & Waddell, G. (1998) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-199809150-00018 · Cited by 1,229
Patients' memories of painful medical treatments: real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures
Redelmeier, D. A., & Kahneman, D. (1996) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(96)02994-6 · Cited by 1,078
Response-shift bias: A source of contamination of self-report measures.
Howard, G. S., & Dailey, P. R. (1979) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.64.2.144 · Cited by 565

Research works printed but not linked: 60

Beaton, 1997, J Clin Epidemiol, 50, 79, 10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00296-X · DOI
Beaton, 1999, Arthritis Rheum, 42, S274
Beurskens, 1996, Pain, 65, 71, 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00149-2 · DOI
Beurskens, 1995, Spine, 20, 1017, 10.1097/00007632-199505000-00008 · DOI
Bombardier, 1991, Control Clin Trials, 12, 243S, 10.1016/S0197-2456(05)80028-5 · DOI
Buchbinder, 1995, Arthritis Rheum, 38, 1568, 10.1002/art.1780381108 · DOI
Burnand, 1990, J Clin Epidemiol, 43, 1273, 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90093-5 · DOI
Christensen, 1986, Behav Ther, 17, 305, 10.1016/S0005-7894(86)80060-0 · DOI
Cronbach, 1970, Psychol Bull, 74, 68, 10.1037/h0029382 · DOI
De Bruin, 1997, J Clin Epidemiol, 50, 529, 10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00047-4 · DOI
Deyo, 1992, Med Care, 30, MS176, 10.1097/00005650-199205001-00015 · DOI
Deyo, 1986, J Chronic Dis, 39, 897, 10.1016/0021-9681(86)90038-X · DOI
Deyo, 1991, Control Clin Trials, 12, 142S, 10.1016/S0197-2456(05)80019-4 · DOI
Deyo, 1995, Med Care, 33, AS286
Feinstein, 1992, Med Care, 30, MS50, 10.1097/00005650-199205001-00005 · DOI
Fischer, 1999, JAMA, 282, 1157, 10.1001/jama.282.12.1157 · DOI
Fletcher, 1992, BMJ, 305, 1145, 10.1136/bmj.305.6862.1145 · DOI
Gill, 1994, JAMA, 272, 619, 10.1001/jama.1994.03520080061045 · DOI
Goldsmith, 1993, J Rheumatol, 20, 561
Greenfield, 1992, Med Care, 30, MS23, 10.1097/00005650-199205001-00003 · DOI
Guyatt, 1994, JAMA, 272, 630, 10.1001/jama.1994.03520080072047 · DOI
Guyatt, 1987, J Chronic Dis, 40, 171, 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90069-5 · DOI
Hemingway, 1997, BMJ, 315, 1273, 10.1136/bmj.315.7118.1273 · DOI
Herrmann, 1995, Med Care, 33, AS89
Jacobs, 1996, J Clin Epidemiol, 49, 163, 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00525-0 · DOI
Juniper, 1994, J Clin Epidemiol, 47, 81, 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90036-1 · DOI · Paper page
Katz, 1992, Med Care, 30, 917, 10.1097/00005650-199210000-00004 · DOI
Leplege, 1997, JAMA, 278, 47, 10.1001/jama.1997.03550010061041 · DOI
Liang, 1995, J Rheumatol, 22, 1191
Liang, 1990, Med Care, 28, 632, 10.1097/00005650-199007000-00008 · DOI
Linton, 1982, Pain, 13, 281, 10.1016/0304-3959(82)90017-3 · DOI
Lydick, 1993, Qual Life Res, 2, 221, 10.1007/BF00435226 · DOI
McDowell, 1996, J Health Serv Res Policy, 1, 238, 10.1177/135581969600100410 · DOI
Mitchell, 1995, Med Care, 33, AS280, 10.1097/00005650-199504000-00009 · DOI
Patrick, 1995, Spine, 20, 1899, 10.1097/00007632-199509000-00011 · DOI · Paper page
Pocock, 1991, Control Clin Trials, 12, 257S, 10.1016/S0197-2456(05)80029-7 · DOI
Ravaud, 1999, J Clin Epidemiol, 52, 1225, 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00109-2 · DOI
Redelmeier, 1996, Chest, 109, 1163, 10.1378/chest.109.5.1163 · DOI
Redelmeier, 1996, J Clin Epidemiol, 49, 1215, 10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00206-5 · DOI
Redelmeier, 1996, J Clin Epidemiol, 49, 1223, 10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00208-9 · DOI
Redelmeier, 1993, Arch Intern Med, 153, 1337, 10.1001/archinte.1993.00410110045008 · DOI
Relman, 1988, N Engl J Med, 319, 1220, 10.1056/NEJM198811033191810 · DOI
Riddle, 1998, Phys Ther, 78, 1197, 10.1093/ptj/78.11.1197 · DOI
Rogosa, 1982, Psychol Bull, 92, 726, 10.1037/0033-2909.92.3.726 · DOI
Ross, 1989, Psychol Rev, 96, 341, 10.1037/0033-295X.96.2.341 · DOI
Sadler, 1992, Clin Chem, 38, 1773, 10.1093/clinchem/38.9.1773 · DOI
Schwartz, 1999, Soc Sci Med, 48, 1505, 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00044-1 · DOI
Schwartz, 1999, Soc Sci Med, 48, 1531, 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00047-7 · DOI
Stratford, 1999, J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 29, 232, 10.2519/jospt.1999.29.4.232 · DOI
Stratford, 1996, Phys Ther, 76, 359, 10.1093/ptj/76.4.359 · DOI
Stratford, 1997, Spine, 22, 2416, 10.1097/00007632-199710150-00018 · DOI
Stratford, 1998, Phys Ther, 78, 1186, 10.1093/ptj/78.11.1186 · DOI
Stratford, 1994, Phys Ther, 75, 528, 10.1093/ptj/74.6.528 · DOI
Stratford, 1996, Physiotherapy Can, 48, 107
Stucki, 1996, J Clin Epidemiol, 49, 711, 10.1016/0895-4356(96)00016-9 · DOI
Taylor, 1999, Spine, 24, 1805, 10.1097/00007632-199909010-00010 · DOI
Testa, 1987, J Hypertens, 5, S9
Testa, 1996, N Engl J Med, 334, 335, 10.1056/NEJM199603283341306 · DOI
Wright, 1996, J Clin Epidemiol, 49, 1221, 10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00207-7 · DOI
Wright, 1998, J Clin Epidemiol, 50, 239, 10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00373-3 · DOI

Sorted by citations

Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
Dworkin, R. H., Turk, D. C., Wyrwich, K. W., Beaton, D., Cleeland, C. S., Farrar, J. T., Haythornthwaite, J. A., Jensen, M. P., Kerns, R. D., Ader, D. N., et al. (2008) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2007.09.005 · Cited by 3,471
Self-citation
Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: A review of concepts and methods
Copay, A. G., Subach, B. R., Glassman, S. D., Polly, D. W., & Schuler, T. C. (2007) · The Spine Journal · doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2007.01.008 · Cited by 1,662
Global Rating of Change Scales: A Review of Strengths and Weaknesses and Considerations for Design
Kamper, S. J., Maher, C. G., & Mackay, G. (2009) · Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy · doi:10.1179/jmt.2009.17.3.163 · Cited by 1,458
Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after hip joint replacement
Quintana, J. M., Escobar, A., Bilbao, A., Arostegui, I., Lafuente, I., & Vidaurreta, I. (2005) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2005.06.012 · Cited by 510
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the German version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Meyer, K., Sprott, H., & Mannion, A. F. (2008) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.12.004 · Cited by 319

See all 344

Authors: Beaton, D. E.
Affiliations: University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author: Beaton, Dorcas E.
Venue: Spine
Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published: 2000-12
Volume: 25
Issue: 24
Pages: 3192-3199
ISSN: 0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00015
OpenAlex: W2053496236
Cited by: 344
References: 7
Citations by year: 2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 23
FWCI: 0.63
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Spine (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics: Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords: responsiveness, outcome measurement, occupational therapy, workplace health, patient-reported outcomes
MeSH terms: Health Status, Humans, Pain Measurement, Physician-Patient Relations, Spinal Diseases, Patient Satisfaction, Low Back Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Understanding the Relevance of Measured Change Through Studies of Responsiveness

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Metadata

Record

About these checks