Cited by 40Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Clinical Course of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder From Childhood Toward Early Adolescence

STEINHAUSEN, HANS-CHRISTOPH, DRECHSLER, RENATE, FÖLDÉNYI, MONIKA, IMHOF, KATRIN, BRANDEIS, DANIEL·2003·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective To study the course of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in late childhood to adolescence using a multi-informant and multi-assessment procedure.Method Subjects were 35 children with ADHD and 35 matched controls with a mean age of 10 years at first assessment. DSM-III-R-based structured diagnostic interviews and behavioral questionnaires based on parents, teachers, and youth informants were used. Cross-informant behavioral syndromes were obtained by use of the Child Behavior Checklist, the Teacher's Report Form, and the Youth Self-Report. Subjects were reassessed after 1.5 and 2.6 years.Results Behavioral differences between the two groups were significant for the majority of scales for all three informants at all three times. Diagnostic interviews revealed a persistence rate of 46% over 2.6 years. However, there were only few significant behavioral differences across informants between the nonpersistent and the persistent groups. The fit between interview-derived syndrome scores reflecting subtypes of ADHD and both parents and youth questionnaire data was good, whereas for the teacher ratings it was poor. A high rate of 89% correct classification of the outcome diagnoses was possible based on behavioral data at time 1.Conclusions The study of the course of ADHD should be based both on interview and questionnaire data and should include several informants. Operationally defined diagnoses alone may lead to an underestimation of persistent behavioral problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.chi.0000070241.24125.a3

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
STEINHAUSEN, H.-C., DRECHSLER, R., FÖLDÉNYI, M., IMHOF, K., & BRANDEIS, D.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
STEINHAUSEN, HANS-CHRISTOPH
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-09
Volume
42
Issue
9
Pages
1085-1092
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2163022105
Cited by
40
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, early adolescence, late childhood, multi-informant assessment, Child Behavior Checklist, Teacher's Report Form, Youth Self-Report, diagnostic interview, behavioral problems
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Child Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Syndrome, Reproducibility of Results, Case-Control Studies, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review