Cited by 112Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Predictors of persistence in girls with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: results from an 11‐year controlled follow‐up study

Open access
Biederman, J., Petty, C. R., O’Connor, K. B., Hyder, L. L., Faraone, S. V.·2012·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

Biederman J, Petty CR, O’Connor KB, Hyder LL, Faraone SV. Predictors of persistence in girls with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: results from an 11‐year controlled follow‐up study. Objective: This study sought to examine the age‐dependent persistence of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and its predictors in a large sample of girls with and without ADHD followed prospectively for 11 years into young adulthood. Method: Participants were girls with (N = 96) and without (N = 91) ADHD and were 6–17 years old at the baseline assessment (mean age, 11 years) and 15–30 years old at the follow‐up assessment (mean: 22 years). Participants were comprehensively and blindly assessed with structured diagnostic interviews and assessments of cognitive, social, school, and family functioning. Results: At the 11‐year follow‐up, 33.3% met full criteria for ADHD, 29.2% showed partial persistence of the disorder, 10.4% had impaired functioning, and 4.2% were remitted but treated (77.1% of the sample). Predictors of persistence were psychiatric comorbidity, family history of psychopathology, and family and school functioning at baseline. Conclusion: These long‐term, prospective, follow‐up findings extend to girls findings that ADHD is persistent over the long term and can be predicted from psychosocial adversity and psychiatric comorbidity ascertained 11 years earlier.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2011.01797.x

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • New research is beginning to define neural predictors and correlates of remission in ADHD.

    “New research is indeed beginning to define neural predictors and correlatesof r emission 94,95,253 .”

    From Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (2015) · cites this paper as [253]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says that persistence and remission in girls with ADHD can be predicted from patterns of comorbidity, familiality, and adversity. It does not identify neural predictors or correlates; searches for neural and neuroimaging terms found no such evidence in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Biederman and colleagues demonstrated that 65-67% of young adults (mean age 22) with childhood ADHD no longer met full DSM criteria.

    “Biederman and colleagues7–8 demonstrated that 65–67% young adults (mean age 22) with childhood ADHD no longer met full DSM criteria.”

    From Variable Patterns of Remission From ADHD in the Multimodal Treatment Study of ADHD (2022) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Results (age-specific prevalence; page unavailable) report that 32 of 96 girls with childhood ADHD (33.3%) still met full diagnostic criteria, so 66.7% no longer did. The Results also give a mean follow-up age of 22.1 years. The claim omits that the study followed girls specifically and that some participants had not yet reached adulthood; it should not be read as saying that 66.7% were fully remitted. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Young adult assessments corresponding temporally with Biederman and colleagues' estimates (12- and 14-year assessments) demonstrated comparable full remission rates (18% vs 22-23%).

    “Young adult assessments corresponding temporally with Biederman and colleagues’ estimates (i.e., 12- and 14-year assessments) demonstrated comparable full remission rates (18% vs 22–23%).”
  • In Biederman and colleagues' studies, the vast majority (77-78%) had clinically elevated ADHD symptoms, impairment, and/or continuation of ADHD treatments.

    “On the other hand, the vast majority (77–78%) had clinically elevated ADHD symptoms, impairment, and/or continuation of ADHD treatments.”
  • This study is consistent with previous findings that, at a single timepoint, most individuals who no longer meet ADHD DSM criteria still experience elevated symptoms or impairments or are actively treated with medication.

    “This study is consistent with previous findings that, at a single timepoint, most individuals who no longer meet ADHD DSM criteria still experience elevated symptoms or impairments or are actively treated with medication (see Table 2).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [27]Orvaschel H Schedule for Affective Disorder and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children Epidemiologic Version 1994 5th Edition ed. Ft. Lauderdale Nova Southeastern University, Center for Psychological Studies
  2. [29]Hollingshead AB Four Factor Index of Social Status 1975 New Haven Yale Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Biederman, J., Petty, C. R., O’Connor, K. B., Hyder, L. L., & Faraone, S. V.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • SUNY Upstate Medical University (US)
Corresponding author
Biederman, J.
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-11-19
Volume
125
Issue
2
Pages
147-156
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W1531338217
Cited by
112
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • University of Cambridge
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R03MH079954)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, ADHD persistence, girls, long-term follow-up, predictors of persistence, psychiatric comorbidity, family functioning, school functioning, psychosocial adversity, remission, early adulthood
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Mental Disorders, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychopathology, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review