Cited by 224Gut microbiota and healthDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Analysis of the relationship between the gut microbiome and dementia: a cross-sectional study conducted in Japan

Open access
Saji, Naoki, Niida, Shumpei, Murotani, Kenta, Hisada, Takayoshi, Tsuduki, Tsuyoshi, Sugimoto, Taiki, Kimura, Ai, Toba, Kenji +1 more·2019·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Dysregulation of the gut microbiome is associated with several life-threatening conditions and thus might represent a useful target for the prevention of dementia. However, the relationship between the gut microbial population and dementia has not yet been fully clarified. We recruited outpatients visiting our memory clinic to participate in this study. Information on patient demographics, risk factors, and activities of daily living was collected, and cognitive function was assessed using neuropsychological tests and brain magnetic resonance imaging scans. Faecal samples were obtained, and the gut microbiome was assessed by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis, one of the most well-established and reliable 16S ribosomal RNA-based methods for classifying gut microbiota. Patients were divided into two groups, demented and non-demented. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify the variables independently associated with dementia. The T-RFLP analysis revealed differences in the composition of the gut microbiome: the number of Bacteroides (enterotype I) was lower and the number of 'other' bacteria (enterotype III) was higher in demented than non-demented patients. Multivariable analyses showed that the populations of enterotype I and enterotype III bacteria were strongly associated with dementia, independent of the traditional dementia biomarkers. Further studies of the metabolites of gut microbes are needed to determine the mechanism underlying this association.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-018-38218-7

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human studies comparing the composition of the GM of elderly participants suffering from cognitive impairment with healthy individuals indicate significant changes in GM composition, specifically an increase in pro-inflammatory taxa and a reduction in anti-inflammatory taxa.

    “Human studies comparing the composition of the GM of elderly participants suffering from cognitive impairment with healthy individuals indicate significant changes in GM composition. Specifically, there is an increase in pro-inflammatory taxa and a reduction in anti-inflammatory taxa (104–109).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saji, N., Niida, S., Murotani, K., Hisada, T., Tsuduki, T., Sugimoto, T., Kimura, A., Toba, K., & Sakurai, T.
Affiliations
  • Center for Comprehensive Care and Research on Memory Disorders, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology (JP)
  • Medical Genome Center, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology (JP)
  • Kurume University (JP)
  • Technosuruga Laboratory Co., Ltd. (Japan) (JP)
  • Tohoku University (JP)
Corresponding author
Saji, Naoki
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2019-01-30
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
1008-1008
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2911545950
Cited by
224
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 18
FWCI
10.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology (27-21, 28-15, 28-15, 27-21)
  • Bio-oriented Technology Research Advancement Institution
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
gut microbiota, dementia, enterotypes, Bacteroides, cognitive function, memory clinic patients, fecal microbiota, dementia risk factors
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bacteria, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dementia, Feces, Female, Humans, Japan, Male, RNA, Bacterial, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review