Cited by 139Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthCholesterol and Lipid MetabolismCancer, Lipids, and Metabolism

Clinical implications for statin pleiotropy

Liao, James K·2005·Current Opinion in Lipidology

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Atherosclerosis is a multi-factorial condition involving dyslipidemia that can result in cardiovascular disease. Statins are potent inhibitors of cholesterol biosynthesis, and in clinical trials, statins have been shown to be beneficial in the primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. However, the overall benefits observed with statins appear to occur much earlier and to be greater than what might be expected from changes in lipid levels alone, suggesting effects beyond cholesterol lowering. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS: Recent studies indicate that some of the cholesterol-independent or 'pleiotropic' effects of statins involve improving endothelial function, enhancing the stability of atherosclerotic plaques, decreasing oxidative stress and inflammation, and inhibiting the thrombogenic response. Many of these pleiotropic effects are mediated by inhibition of isoprenoids, which serve as lipid attachments for intracellular signaling molecules. In particular, inhibition of small GTP-binding proteins, Rho, Ras, and Rac, whose proper membrane localization and function are dependent upon isoprenylation, may play an important role in mediating the pleiotropic effects of statins. SUMMARY: The potential clinical implications of statin pleiotropy suggests that perhaps other biomarkers, in addition to lipid levels, should be used to gauge the full efficacy of statin therapy in patients with cardiovascular risks or that statin therapy may be effective in disease states, such as inflammatory conditions, ischemic stroke or cancer, where elevated cholesterol levels have not been shown to be a strong epidemiological risk for these diseases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.mol.0000191913.16321.60

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liao, J. K.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Liao, James K
Venue
Current Opinion in Lipidology
Published
2005-12
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
624-629
ISSN
0957-9672 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002676488
Cited by
139
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Lipidology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Heart Association
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL 52233, R01HL052233)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS10828)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Keywords
statins, pleiotropy, atherosclerosis, endothelial function, plaque stability, oxidative stress, inflammation, thrombogenicity, Rho GTPases, Ras, Rac, cholesterol-independent effects, cardiovascular disease prevention, dyslipidemia
MeSH terms
Cholesterol, Humans, Risk Factors, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Atherosclerosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review