Cited by 5Sport Psychology and PerformancePsychological Treatments and AssessmentsSports Performance and Training

The effects of biofeedback training on athletes’ mental health and performance: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis

Open access
Zhang, Xuda, Chang, Zhizhao, Zhao, Shiao, Ning, Ziheng·2025·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Background: Biofeedback and neurofeedback are increasingly used in sports psychology, yet their overall effectiveness for athletes’ mental health, athletic performance, and cognitive performance remains unclear. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials across eight databases and performed Bayesian random-effects meta-analyses. Study selection used ASReview with the SAFE rule; full-text screening was done in Covidence; risk of bias followed Cochrane guidance; certainty of evidence was appraised with GRADE. Results: Forty-one studies met inclusion. Pooled effects were statistically significant across domains: mental health µ(SMD)=0.76 (95% CrI 0.44–1.09), athletic performance µ(SMD)=0.88 (0.69–1.05), and cognitive performance µ(SMD)=0.81 (0.48–1.14). Conclusion: Biofeedback and neurofeedback benefit athletes across mental, athletic, and cognitive outcomes. Given heterogeneity and sample sizes, further rigorous trials are warranted to refine the estimates. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration CRD420251015094.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1662868

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HRV biofeedback may improve autonomic regulation via resonant frequency breathing, counteracting sympathetic hyperactivity associated with anxiety.

    “HRV biofeedback may improve autonomic regulation via resonant frequency breathing, counteracting sympathetic hyperactivity associated with anxiety [25].”

    From The Effect of Different Psychological Interventions on Athletes' Competitive Anxiety: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis. (2026) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) links HRV biofeedback to resonance-frequency training and increased parasympathetic activation. The Discussion (page unavailable) links parasympathetic dominance to anxiety reduction and describes breathing adjustments, but does not specifically say that the intervention counteracts sympathetic hyperactivity associated with anxiety. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Egner T. Gruzelier J. H. (2004). EEG biofeedback of low beta band components: frequency-specific effects on attention and ERPs. Clin. Neurophysiol. 115, 131– 139. (Elsevier). 14706480

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, X., Chang, Z., Zhao, S., & Ning, Z.
Affiliations
  • Macao Polytechnic University (MO)
  • Lanzhou University (CN)
Corresponding author
Chang, Zhizhao
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2025-10-21
Volume
16
Pages
1662868-1662868
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4415388121
Cited by
5
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 5
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
biofeedback, neurofeedback, athletes, mental health, athletic performance, cognitive performance, sport psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review