Cited by 183Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsStress Responses and Cortisol

The effect of short duration heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback on cognitive performance during laboratory induced cognitive stress

Prinsloo, Gabriell E., Rauch, H. G. Laurie, Lambert, Michael I., Muench, Frederick, Noakes, Timothy D., Derman, Wayne E.·2011·Applied Cognitive Psychology

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of 10 minutes of heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback on cognitive performance and affect scores during induced stress. Eighteen healthy male volunteers (aged 23–41 years) exposed to work‐related stress, were randomised into an HRV biofeedback intervention (BIO) and a comparative intervention group (COM). Subjects completed a modified Stroop task, which included having to mentally count 18 white squares randomly presented between colour words, before and after a 10‐minute intervention. Subjects also completed questionnaires to rate their anxiety. BIO subjects improved their reaction times and consistency of responses, and made fewer mistakes in counting squares during the modified Stroop task. They also felt more relaxed, less anxious and less sleepy than the COM subjects. In conclusion our results suggest that short duration HRV biofeedback is associated with improved cognitive performance while concurrently aiding relaxation. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/acp.1750

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prinsloo, G. E., Rauch, H. G. L., Lambert, M. I., Muench, F., Noakes, T. D., & Derman, W. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Prinsloo, Gabriell E.
Venue
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-10-17
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
792-801
ISSN
  • 0888-4080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0720
OpenAlex
W2033941978
Cited by
183
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
heart rate variability biofeedback, cognitive performance, cognitive stress, Stroop task, reaction time, anxiety, relaxation, occupational stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review