Cited by 683Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

Cardiovascular Reactivity and Development of Preclinical and Clinical Disease States

Treiber, Frank A., Kamarck, Thomas, Schneiderman, Neil, Sheffield, David, Kapuku, Gaston, Taylor, Teletia·2003·Psychosomatic Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to evaluate the evidence for the hypothesis that cardiovascular reactivity can predict the development of preclinical (elevated blood pressure, ventricular remodeling, carotid atherosclerosis) and/or clinical cardiovascular disease states. METHODS: A review of the literature was conducted examining prospective studies. RESULTS: Three large epidemiological studies with long-term follow-up periods (20 years or more) have found blood pressure responses to the cold pressor task to be predictive of subsequent essential hypertension in initially normotensive samples. Studies showing less consistent results have tended to use shorter-term follow-up periods. A larger body of literature demonstrates consistent associations between stress-related cardiovascular reactivity and blood pressure elevations in youth over the course of 1 to 6 years; such relationships have not been consistently shown among adult samples. Moderately consistent evidence points to a positive relationship between reactivity and other measures of subclinical disease (increased left ventricular mass and carotid atherosclerosis) among the few prospective studies that have examined these issues to date. A number of additional factors, however, such as baseline levels of disease risk and exposure to psychosocial stress, seem to moderate these relationships. Health status at baseline also seems to moderate the association between reactivity and clinical coronary heart disease in recent reports: two of three existing studies in initially healthy samples show no evidence of a relationship between reactivity and clinical outcomes, whereas three of four studies in samples with preexisting coronary heart disease or essential hypertension show a positive relationship between reactivity and subsequent disease states. CONCLUSIONS: There is reasonable evidence to suggest that cardiovascular reactivity can predict the development of some preclinical states (eg, increased left ventricular mass and blood pressure) states and perhaps even new clinical events in some patients with essential hypertension or coronary heart disease. However, much more information is needed concerning moderating and potentially confounding variables before the robustness of the positive relationships can become clinically useful.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00006842-200301000-00007

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Treiber, F. A., Kamarck, T., Schneiderman, N., Sheffield, D., Kapuku, G., & Taylor, T.
Affiliations
  • Augusta University (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
Venue
Psychosomatic Medicine
Published
2003-01
Volume
65
Issue
1
Pages
46-62
ISSN
0033-3174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2322678100
Cited by
683
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 39
FWCI
5.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychosomatic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Keywords
cardiovascular reactivity, cold pressor test, essential hypertension, coronary artery disease, left ventricular mass, carotid atherosclerosis, ventricular remodeling, psychosocial stress, preclinical cardiovascular disease, disease risk prediction, moderators
MeSH terms
Adult, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cardiovascular System, Carotid Arteries, Cold Temperature, Disease Susceptibility, Ethnicity, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hemodynamics, Humans, Individuality, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Research Design, Ultrasonography, Cohort Studies, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review