Cited by 47Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealthcare Quality and ManagementTeam Dynamics and Performance

Team Effectiveness and Organizational Context in the Implementation of a Clinical Innovation

Lukas, Carol VanDeusen, Mohr, David C., Meterko, Mark·2009·Quality Management in Health Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The study examined the relationship between care delivery team effectiveness, management support, organizational culture, and the extent of implementation of a clinical innovation. METHODS: The study involved 6 target clinic areas in 78 Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers that participated in the national implementation of Advanced Clinic Access (ACA). Primary data were collected through staff surveys and structured interviews; secondary analyses were conducted using administrative databases. Hierarchical linear models were used to test the influence of team effectiveness and organizational context on implementation ratings. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Team effectiveness as measured by team knowledge and skills was significantly associated with the extent of ACA implementation in both primary and specialty care. Team functioning was significant only in primary care. Management support as measured by personal leadership support for quality improvement and the importance of reduced wait times was also significantly associated with ACA implementation, but practical management support and organizational culture were not. Team effectiveness partially mediated the relationship between extent of implementation and personal leadership support. Findings support the underlying theory that implementation of clinical innovations depends on both individual staff and a more complex dynamic of individuals operating within work units in the larger organization.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.qmh.0000344591.56133.90

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lukas, C. V., Mohr, D. C., & Meterko, M.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Venue
Quality Management in Health Care
Published
2009-01
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
25-39
ISSN
1063-8628 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2332098057
Cited by
47
References
34
Citations by year
2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Quality Management in Health Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Keywords
team effectiveness, organizational context, management support, organizational culture, veterans' health care, team functioning, leadership support, waiting time, primary care, specialist care, quality improvement
MeSH terms
Cooperative Behavior, Diffusion of Innovation, Hospitals, Veterans, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Medical Staff, Hospital, Quality of Health Care, Organizational Culture, Efficiency, Organizational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review