Cited by 72Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchBarrier Structure and Function StudiesNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Fluorometric Determination of Glucose Utilization in Neurons in Vitro and in Vivo

Itoh, Yoshiaki, Abe, Takato, Takaoka, Rie, Tanahashi, Norio·2004·Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism

Abstract

Glucose is the major energy source the adult brain utilizes under physiologic conditions. Recent findings, however, have suggested that neurons obtain most of their energy from the oxidation of extracellular lactate derived from astroglial metabolism of glucose transported into the brain from the blood. In the present studies we have used 2-[N-(7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl)amino]-2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-NBDG), a fluorescent analogue of 2-deoxyglucose, which is often used to trace glucose utilization in neural tissues, to examine glucose metabolism in neurons in vitro and in vivo. Cultured neurons and astroglia were incubated with 2-NBDG for up to 15 minutes, and nonmetabolized 2-NBDG was washed out. We found that fluorescence intensity increased linearly with incubation time in both neurons and astroglia, indicating that both types of brain cells could utilize glucose as their energy source in vitro. To determine if the same were true in vivo, Sprague-Dawley rats were injected intravenously with a pulse bolus of 2-NBDG and decapitated 45 minutes later. Examination of brain sections demonstrated that phosphorylated 2-NBDG accumulated in hippocampal neurons and cerebellar Purkinje cells, indicating that neurons can utilize glucose in vivo as energy source.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.wcb.0000127661.07591.de

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In vivo labeling with the fluorescent glucose analogue 2-NBDG shows stronger signals in neurons.

    “High-resolution autoradiographic analysis of [14C]–2-DG uptake in awake but unstimulated rats revealed roughly comparable label uptake in neurons and astrocytes (Nehlig et al., 2004); another in vivo labeling study using the fluorescent glucose analogue 2-NBDG showed stronger signals in neurons (Itoh et al., 2004).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Itoh, Y., Abe, T., Takaoka, R., & Tanahashi, N.
Affiliations
Keio University (JP)
Corresponding author
Itoh, Yoshiaki
Venue
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
Published
2004-09
Volume
24
Issue
9
Pages
993-1003
ISSN
  • 0271-678X (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-7016
OpenAlex
W2028811698
Cited by
72
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
glucose utilization, neurons, astroglia, 2-NBDG, 2-deoxyglucose, glucose metabolism, brain energy metabolism, lactate, hippocampal neurons, Purkinje cells
MeSH terms
Animals, Astrocytes, Brain, Cells, Cultured, Fluorometry, Glucosamine, Glucose, Immunohistochemistry, 4-Chloro-7-nitrobenzofurazan, Neurons, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review