Cited by 70Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

Pharmacological and psychosocial treatment of adults with gambling disorder: a meta-review

Di Nicola, Marco, De Crescenzo, Franco, D’Alò, Gian Loreto, Remondi, Chiara, Panaccione, Isabella, Moccia, Lorenzo, Molinaro, Marzia, Dattoli, Luigi +8 more·2020·Journal of Addiction Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Gambling disorder (GD) leads to impaired socioeconomical functioning and increased social costs. Although the research on GD has been rising over the years, approved treatment guidelines are currently not available. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature on the pharmacological and psychosocial treatment of adults with GD, and to identify possible agreed-upon standards of care. METHODS: MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Embase, and CINAHL electronic databases were searched up to April 2019 for systematic reviews on pharmacological, psychosocial, and combined treatment of adults with GD. Twenty-six studies were eventually included in this meta-review. RESULTS: Studies reported promising results of opioid antagonists and mood stabilizers in reducing GD-related symptomatology. Lithium was particularly effective in subjects with comorbid bipolar disorders. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) was the most commonly used psychological intervention and reduced global severity, gambling frequency, and financial loss. Motivational interviewing (MI) seemed to improve several GD domains, alone or in combination with CBT. Self-help interventions (SHIs) showed some efficacy in promoting treatment-seeking, and in combination with other treatments. CONCLUSIONS: We found moderate evidence of effect for CBT, but weaker evidence for pharmacotherapy and SHIs. Results suggested some efficacy for MI in the short but not in the long term. It is likely that certain interventions might be more effective than others on specific features of GD. Further studies are needed to compare the efficacy and acceptability of individual and combined psychosocial and pharmacological interventions, to deliver patient-tailored treatments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/adm.0000000000000574

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies have supported the efficacy of online interventions based on CBT.

    “Previous studies have supported the efficacy of online interventions based on CBT (DiNicola et al., 2020; Jonas et al., 2020)”

    From Efficacy of an internet-based psychological intervention for problem gambling and gambling disorder: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (2021) · cites this paper as DiNicola et al., 2020

    Section 3.4 (p. 11) reports positive results for internet-delivered therapy for gambling disorder, while section 3.2 (p. 9) reports evidence for CBT. Our copy does not establish that the effective online interventions were based on CBT, so it supports the two elements separately but not their combination. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York: Guilford Press, 1991.
  2. Watson JB, Rayner R. Conditioned emotional reactions. J Experimen Psychol 1920;3:1-14.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Di Nicola, M., De Crescenzo, F., D’Alò, G. L., Remondi, C., Panaccione, I., Moccia, L., Molinaro, M., Dattoli, L., Lauriola, A., Martinelli, S., Giuseppin, G., Maisto, F., Crosta, M. L., Di Pietro, S., Amato, L., & Janiri, L.
Affiliations
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
Venue
Journal of Addiction Medicine
Published
2019-10-22
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
e15-e23
ISSN
  • 1932-0620 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-3227
OpenAlex
W2981816620
Cited by
70
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Addiction Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Keywords
gambling addiction, pharmacotherapy, psychosocial interventions, cognitive behavioral therapy, motivational interviewing, self-help intervention, opioid antagonists, mood stabilizers, lithium, bipolar disorder comorbidity, treatment guidelines, standard of care
MeSH terms
Systematic Reviews as Topic, Adult, Bipolar Disorder, Gambling, Humans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Motivational Interviewing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review