Cited by 187Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsDigital Mental Health InterventionsSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Randomized trial of internet-delivered self-help with telephone support for pathological gamblers.

Carlbring, Per, Smit, Filip·2008·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Although effective therapies for pathological gambling exist, their uptake is limited to 10% of the target population. To lower the barriers for help seeking, the authors tested an online alternative in a randomized trial (N = 66). The participants were pathological gamblers not presenting with severe comorbid depression. A wait-list control was compared with an 8-week Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy program with minimal therapist contact via e-mail and weekly telephone calls of less than 15 min. Average time spent on each participant, including phone conversations, e-mail, and administration, was 4 hr. The Internet-based intervention resulted in favorable changes in pathological gambling, anxiety, depression, and quality of life. Composite between-group effect size (Cohen's d) at posttreatment was 0.83. Follow-ups carried out in the treatment group at 6, 18, and 36 months indicated that treatment effects were sustained (ds = 2.58, 1.96, and 1.98). This evidence is in support of Internet-delivered treatment for pathological gamblers. However, it is not clear how effective the treatment is for more severely depressed individuals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0013603

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carlbring, P., & Smit, F.
Affiliations
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Trimbos Institute (NL)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2008-12
Volume
76
Issue
6
Pages
1090-1094
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W1997426905
Cited by
187
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 11
FWCI
10.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Swedish National Institute of Public Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
gambling addiction, internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, telephone support, self-help, help-seeking barriers, treatment uptake, anxiety, depression, quality of life, treatment effects over time
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Female, Gambling, Humans, Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Self-Help Groups, Social Support, Telephone, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review