Cited by 4Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Impulsivity and decision-making style among tramadol drug addicts and its relation to frontal lobe volume

Elbeh, Khaled A., Elserogy, Yasser, Seifeldein, Gehan S., Mostafa, Sayed, Yousef, Hosam A., Fawzy, Mohamed·2021·Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment

Abstract

Objectives: Drug addiction has its effects on different behavioral and personality traits including impulsivity and pattern of decision-making. The frontal lobe was the focus of many of these studies regarding its important role in decision-making and other higher cognitive processes. We aimed to detect the pattern of decision-making styles and impulsivity among people with tramadol addiction, and also to find out if tramadol addiction has effects on the volume of different regions of the frontal lobe. Materials and Methods: Two groups were included: group A included 12 patients with tramadol addiction and group B included 23 healthy cross-matching controls. Both groups were subjected to urine drug screening, Iowa gambling task (IGT), UPPS scales (negative urgency, lack of perseverance, lack of premeditation, and sensation seeking), and structural magnetic resonance imaging brain study. Results: The patients’ group has shown a significantly lower volume of the brain white matter, gray matter, and cortical thickness (P<0.001). This group has also shown a significantly higher scores of IGT-A and IGT-B (P<0.001 and P=0.02, respectively) and has shown a higher score of all subscales of UPPS. Conclusions: Tramadol addiction is associated with a reduced volume of the brain white matter, gray matter, and cortical thickness. All regions of the frontal lobe have shown significant volume reduction in the tramadol group. Tramadol addiction and its duration are associated with risky decision-making style and with higher impulsivity than nonaddicts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/adt.0000000000000256

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elbeh, K. A., Elserogy, Y., Seifeldein, G. S., Mostafa, S., Yousef, H. A., & Fawzy, M.
Affiliations
  • Neurology and Psychiatry
  • Assiut University (EG)
  • Assiut University Hospitals (EG)
Corresponding author
  • Elbeh, Khaled A.
  • Elserogy, Yasser
  • Mostafa, Sayed
  • Fawzy, Mohamed
Venue
Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment
Published
2021-03-24
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
314-325
ISSN
  • 1531-5754 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-1122
OpenAlex
W3145663862
Cited by
4
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
impulsivity, decision-making styles, frontal lobe volume, Iowa Gambling Task, white matter, gray matter, cortical thickness, risky decision making, opioid use disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review