Cited by 476Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Lesion mapping of cognitive control and value-based decision making in the prefrontal cortex

Open access
Gläscher, Jan, Adolphs, Ralph, Damasio, Hanna, Bechara, Antoine, Rudrauf, David, Calamia, Matthew, Paul, Lynn K., Tranel, Daniel·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

A considerable body of previous research on the prefrontal cortex (PFC) has helped characterize the regional specificity of various cognitive functions, such as cognitive control and decision making. Here we provide definitive findings on this topic, using a neuropsychological approach that takes advantage of a unique dataset accrued over several decades. We applied voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping in 344 individuals with focal lesions (165 involving the PFC) who had been tested on a comprehensive battery of neuropsychological tasks. Two distinct functional-anatomical networks were revealed within the PFC: one associated with cognitive control (response inhibition, conflict monitoring, and switching), which included the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex and a second associated with value-based decision-making, which included the orbitofrontal, ventromedial, and frontopolar cortex. Furthermore, cognitive control tasks shared a common performance factor related to set shifting that was linked to the rostral anterior cingulate cortex. By contrast, regions in the ventral PFC were required for decision-making. These findings provide detailed causal evidence for a remarkable functional-anatomical specificity in the human PFC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1206608109

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The VMPFC has long been implicated in reward-related decision-making.

    “The VMPFC has long been implicated in reward-related decision-making (Bechara et al., 1997, 2005; Glascher et al., 2012)”

    From The orbitofrontal cortex: reward, emotion and depression (2020) · cites this paper as Glascher et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [21]Lezak MD, Howeison D, Bigler E, Tranel D. 2012. Neuropsychological Assessment (Oxford Univ Press, New York) 5th Ed.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gläscher, J., Adolphs, R., Damasio, H., Bechara, A., Rudrauf, D., Calamia, M., Paul, L. K., & Tranel, D.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Dana and David Dornsife Cognitive Neuroscience Imaging Institute and
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Departments of gNeurology and
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • Divisions of aHumanities and Social Sciences and
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-08-20
Volume
109
Issue
36
Pages
14681-14686
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1998128125
Cited by
476
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 36
FWCI
19.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p50ns019632-28)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH094258)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA022549)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P50-NS019632, P50NS19632)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
prefrontal cortex, cognitive control, value-based decision making, lesion-symptom mapping, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, frontopolar cortex, response inhibition, conflict monitoring, set-shifting
MeSH terms
Cognition, Decision Making, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Iowa, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Nerve Net, Neuropsychological Tests, Social Values, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Linear Models, Prefrontal Cortex, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review