Cited by 64Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and TreatmentPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Mental Defeat in Chronic Pain: Initial Exploration of the Concept

Tang, Nicole K. Y., Salkovskis, Paul M., Hanna, Magdi·2007·The Clinical Journal of Pain

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: "Mental defeat" has been found to be an important psychologic reaction to painful trauma. Chronic pain patients also report mental defeat in relation to their experience of pain episodes. A measure of mental defeat was devised and evaluated in terms of (1) psychometric properties and (2) specificity of scores in relation to disabling chronic pain. METHODS: A total of 304 participants completed the Pain Self Perception Scale, a questionnaire designed to measure mental defeat as a reaction to pain. Participants also completed the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Chronic pain patients from a tertiary hospital clinic (n=94) were compared with patients experiencing acute pain (n=38), pain-free controls (n=79), community volunteers suffering from chronic pain (n=32) or acute pain (n=30), and patients diagnosed with anxiety disorders (n=31). Test-retest reliability was assessed in subsamples of chronic pain patients and community volunteers. RESULTS: The mental defeat measure was both internally consistent and reliable. Chronic pain patients showed elevated levels of mental defeat relative to all other groups, including people with chronic pain of the same intensity of pain who were not seeking treatment. Pain-specific mental defeat may be linked to disability and the seeking of specialist treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Research on mental defeat may allow the development of new treatment strategies for chronic pain syndromes and a better understanding of the link between chronic pain, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ajp.0b013e31802ec8c6

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tang, N. K. Y., Salkovskis, P. M., & Hanna, M.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • King's College Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Tang, Nicole K. Y.
  • Salkovskis, Paul M.
Venue
The Clinical Journal of Pain
Published
2007-03
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
222-232
ISSN
0749-8047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016952262
Cited by
64
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
mental defeat, chronic pain, psychometric properties, test-retest reliability, disability, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorders, acute pain
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Physical Examination, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Chi-Square Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review