Cited by 275Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMigration, Health and TraumaCriminal Justice and Corrections Analysis

Posttraumatic stress disorder following political imprisonment: the role of mental defeat, alienation, and perceived permanent change

Ehlers, Anke, Maercker, Andreas, Boos, Anne·2000·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

An interview study of 81 former political prisoners investigated whether posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is related to the way individuals process the prison experience. In contrast to participants without PTSD, those with chronic or remitted PTSD were more likely to perceive mental defeat and an overall feeling of alienation from other people. Chronic PTSD was also related to perceived negative and permanent change in their personalities or life aspirations. The groups did not differ in their attempts to gain control during imprisonment. Evidence for a relationship between political commitment and PTSD was mixed. The results suggest that mental defeat, alienation, and permanent change are related to PTSD after interpersonal trauma and may need to be addressed in treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-843x.109.1.45

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Peritraumatic mental defeat has been implicated in the development of PTSD.

    “Peritraumatic mental defeat, a peritraumatic process, consisting of complete loss of inner resistance has also been implicated in the development in PTSD (14, 17, 18) as well as perceived threat to life (19).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ehlers, A., Maercker, A., & Boos, A.
Affiliations
Warneford Hospital (GB)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2000-02
Volume
109
Issue
1
Pages
45-55
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2018894807
Cited by
274
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 12
FWCI
9.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (069777)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, political imprisonment, former political prisoners, mental defeat, alienation, personality change, political commitment, interpersonal trauma, chronic PTSD
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Chronic Disease, Female, Germany, Germany, East, Humans, Male, Personality, Politics, Prisoners, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review