Cited by 89Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and TreatmentPediatric Pain Management Techniques

Pain-related Activity Patterns: Measurement, Interrelationships, and Associations With Psychosocial Functioning

Cane, Douglas, Nielson, Warren R., McCarthy, Mary, Mazmanian, Dwight·2013·The Clinical Journal of Pain

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Changes in activity frequently occur as a consequence of ongoing pain. Three activity patterns commonly observed among individuals with ongoing pain are avoidance, overdoing, and pacing. We conducted 2 studies investigating these activity patterns, their interrelationships, and their associations with key psychosocial factors. Study 1 describes the development of a measure, the Patterns of Activity-Pain (POAM-P), to assess these activity patterns; Study 2 examines the psychosocial correlates of these activity patterns. METHODS: In study 1, a sample of 393 individuals with chronic pain responded to a pool of 51 items assessing activity as part of their pretreatment assessment. Item analyses were conducted to create a 30-item measure with 3, 10-item scales assessing avoidance, overdoing, and pacing. In study 2, a sample of 164 individuals attending a follow-up program 3 months after treatment completed the POAM-P along with measures of affect, pain control, and disability. RESULTS: scales demonstrated excellent internal consistency and correlations with other measures provided initial support for construct validity. Avoidance and overdoing were associated with negative psychosocial outcomes whereas pacing was associated with positive outcomes. In contrast to previous studies, pacing and avoidance were unrelated. DISCUSSION: The POAM-P has excellent psychometric properties and may be useful in clinical practice to identify activity patterns associated with poorer functioning and to evaluate interventions intended to modify these activity patterns. The present results support previous findings linking avoidance and various negative outcomes. These results also provide evidence that pacing may be related to positive outcomes after treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ajp.0b013e31825e452f

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cane, D., Nielson, W. R., McCarthy, M., & Mazmanian, D.
Affiliations
  • Capital District Health Authority (CA)
  • St Joseph's Health Care (CA)
  • Lakehead University (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Cane, Douglas
  • McCarthy, Mary
Venue
The Clinical Journal of Pain
Published
2013-05
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
435-442
ISSN
0749-8047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005875475
Cited by
89
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
chronic pain, activity patterns, avoidance, pacing, psychosocial factors, pain management, disability, affect, psychometric validation
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Motor Activity, Nova Scotia, Pain Measurement, Personality Disorders, Psychology, Risk Factors, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review