Cited by 24Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMedical Practices and RehabilitationPain Management and Treatment

Validation of the French Version of the “Patterns of Activity Measure” in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain

Open access
Benaim, Charles, Léger, Bertrand, Vuistiner, Philippe, Luthi, François·2017·Pain Research and Management

Abstract

Background. The “Patterns of Activity Measure” (POAM-P) is a self-administered questionnaire that assesses “avoidance”, “pacing” and “overdoing” activity patterns in chronic pain patients.Objectives. To adapt the POAM-P to French (“POAM-P/F”) and test its validity and reliability in Chronic Musculo-Skeletal Pain patients (CMSP).Methods. We followed the recommended procedure for translation of questionnaires. Five hundred and ninety five inpatients, admitted to a tertiary rehab center in the French-speaking part of Switzerland for chronic pain after orthopedic trauma, were included (sex ratio M/F = 4.36, mean age 43±12 ). Face, content and criterion validities, internal consistency and reliability were assessed. Data included: TAMPA Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), Chronic Pain Coping Inventory (CPCI), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).Results. Face and content validities were checked during the translation process. Correlations between POAM-P/F-avoidance and TSK, POAM-P/F-pacing and CPCI-pacing, POAM-P/F-overdoing and CPCI-task persistence were highly significant ( r>0.3 , p<10-2 ). The three subscales demonstrated excellent homogeneity (Cronbach’s alpha coefficients > 0.8) and test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficients > 0.8). They correlated very differently with the other scales.Discussion and Conclusion. The three POAM-P/F subscales clearly assess different behaviors in CMSP. The POAM-P/F is a suitable questionnaire for classifying French speaking CMSP into avoiders, pacers or overdoers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2017/6570394

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Internal structure validity of the POAM-P was not examined in the original study of the scale or in the Dutch adaptation, French adaptation and Spanish translation studies.

    “internal structure validity was not examined in the original study of the scale or in the Dutch adaptation, French adaptation, and Spanish translation studies”

    From Turkish Translation of the Patterns of Activity Measure-Pain in Patients with Chronic Low Back and Neck Pain: Validity and Reliability. (2022) · cites this paper as Benaim et al., 2017

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says the Dutch adaptation confirmed the POAM-P’s three-factor structure, contrary to the claim that internal structure validity was not examined there. The French study’s Methods (page unavailable) also describe a principal component analysis, although it used subscale scores rather than testing the questionnaire’s item-level structure. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The negative correlation between pacing and depression and anxiety found in this study supports the original and French adaptation study results.

    “This result supports the original and French adaptation study results.”

    From Turkish Translation of the Patterns of Activity Measure-Pain in Patients with Chronic Low Back and Neck Pain: Validity and Reliability. (2022) · cites this paper as Benaim et al., 2017

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says psychological disturbances were linked to higher avoidance and lower overdoing scores, whereas pacing was linked to higher age. The Results (section 3.2, page unavailable) likewise associate the mood factor with avoidance, not pacing; the French adaptation study therefore does not report the claimed negative correlation between pacing and depression or anxiety. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The negative correlation between avoidance and depression and anxiety found in this study differs from the results of the original and French adaptation studies of the scale.

    “This relationship was different from the results of original and French adaptation studies”

    From Turkish Translation of the Patterns of Activity Measure-Pain in Patients with Chronic Low Back and Neck Pain: Validity and Reliability. (2022) · cites this paper as Benaim et al., 2017

    The French adaptation’s Results (section 3.2, page unavailable) place avoidance in the same direction as the psychological scales on a factor strongly associated with anxiety and depression. That supports a contrast with the citing study’s negative correlation. The Introduction describes the original study’s avoidance scores as associated with negative psychosocial outcomes, but does not establish its specific correlations with depression and anxiety. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The positive correlation between overdoing and depression and anxiety supports the original study result of the scale but does not support the French adaptation study result.

    “This correlation supports the original study result of the scale but does not support the French adaptation study result.”

    From Turkish Translation of the Patterns of Activity Measure-Pain in Patients with Chronic Low Back and Neck Pain: Validity and Reliability. (2022) · cites this paper as Benaim et al., 2017

    The Discussion (p. not provided) supports the contrast with the French adaptation: it reports higher psychological disturbances alongside lower overdoing scores. The Introduction (p. not provided) says the original study associated overdoing with negative psychosocial outcomes, but does not specify positive correlations with both depression and anxiety. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In the French version of the POAM-P, Cronbach alpha values were 0.877 for avoidance, 0.846 for overdoing and 0.891 for pacing.

    “In the French version of the scale, Cronbach alpha values were calculated for internal consistency as 0.877 for avoidance, 0.846 for overdoing, and 0.891 for pacing”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [20]Kindermans H. Roelofs J. Goossens M. Huijnen I. Verbunt J. Vlaeyen J. 772 Measuring avoidance, overdoing, and pacing in patients with chronic pain: psychometric properties of the patterns of activity measure-pain European Journal of Pain 2009 13 S222 S223
  2. [24]Cleeland C. S. Chapman C. R. Loeser J. D. Measurement of pain by subjective report Advances in Pain Research and Therapy 1989 New York, NY, USA Raven Press 391 403

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benaim, C., Léger, B., Vuistiner, P., & Luthi, F.
Affiliations
  • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Orthopaedic Hospital, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Clinique Romande de Réadaptation (CH)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
Venue
Pain Research and Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017
Volume
2017
Pages
1-7
ISSN
  • 1203-6765 (ISSN-L)
  • 1918-1523
OpenAlex
W2585082977
Cited by
24
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 6
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pain Research and Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
chronic musculoskeletal pain, French translation, questionnaire validation, activity avoidance, pacing behavior, kinesiophobia, pain coping, pain catastrophizing, orthopedic trauma, rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Depression, Disability Evaluation, Female, France, Humans, Male, Pain Measurement, Surveys and Questionnaires, Translating, Reproducibility of Results, Principal Component Analysis, Catastrophization, Diagnostic Self Evaluation, Chronic Pain, Musculoskeletal Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review