Cited by 21Anesthesia and Sedative AgentsAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity ResearchNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Syntaxin1A neomorphic mutations promote rapid recovery from isoflurane anesthesia in Drosophila melanogaster

Troup, Michael, Zalucki, Oressia H., Kottler, Benjamin D., Karunanithi, Shanker, Anggono, Victor, van Swinderen, Bruno·2019·Anesthesiology

Abstract

Editor’s Perspective: What We Already Know about This Topic: What This Article Tells Us That Is New: Background: Mutations in the presynaptic protein syntaxin1A modulate general anesthetic effects in vitro and in vivo. Coexpression of a truncated syntaxin1A protein confers resistance to volatile and intravenous anesthetics, suggesting a target mechanism distinct from postsynaptic inhibitory receptor processes. Hypothesizing that recovery from anesthesia may involve a presynaptic component, the authors tested whether syntaxin1A mutations facilitated recovery from isoflurane anesthesia in Drosophila melanogaster . Methods: A truncated syntaxin1A construct was expressed in Drosophila neurons. The authors compared effects on isoflurane induction versus recovery in syntaxin1A mutant animals by probing behavioral responses to mechanical stimuli. The authors also measured synaptic responses from the larval neuromuscular junction using sharp intracellular recordings, and performed Western blots to determine whether the truncated syntaxin1A is associated with presynaptic core complexes. Results: Drosophila expressing a truncated syntaxin1A (syx 227 , n = 40) were resistant to isoflurane induction for a behavioral responsiveness endpoint (ED50 0.30 ± 0.01% isoflurane, P < 0.001) compared with control (0.240 ± 0.002% isoflurane, n = 40). Recovery from isoflurane anesthesia was also faster, with syx 227 -expressing flies showing greater levels of responsiveness earlier in recovery (reaction proportion 0.66 ± 0.48, P < 0.001, n = 68) than controls (0.22 ± 0.42, n = 68 and 0.33 ± 0.48, n = 66). Measuring excitatory junction potentials of larvae coexpressing the truncated syntaxin1A protein showed a greater recovery of synaptic function, compared with controls (17.39 ± 3.19 mV and 10.29 ± 4.88 mV, P = 0.014, n = 8 for both). The resistance-promoting truncated syntaxin1A was not associated with presynaptic core complexes, in the presence or absence of isoflurane anesthesia. Conclusions: The same neomorphic syntaxin1A mutation that confers isoflurane resistance in cell culture and nematodes also produces isoflurane resistance in Drosophila . Resistance in Drosophila is, however, most evident at the level of recovery from anesthesia, suggesting that the syntaxin1A target affects anesthesia maintenance and recovery processes rather than induction. The absence of truncated syntaxin1A from the presynaptic complex suggests that the resistance-promoting effect of this molecule occurs before core complex formation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aln.0000000000002850

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recovery from anesthetic-induced modulation of presynaptic function plays an important role in exit from anesthetic states.

    “Recovery from anesthetic-induced modulation of presynpatic function appears to play an even more important role in the exit from anesthetic states [81].”

    From The Biology of General Anesthesia from Paramecium to Primate (2019) · cites this paper as [81]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Troup, M., Zalucki, O. H., Kottler, B. D., Karunanithi, S., Anggono, V., & van Swinderen, B.
Affiliations
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • From the Queensland Brain Institute (M.T., O.H.Z., B.D.K., S.K., V.A., B.v.S.), School of Biomedical Sciences (O.H.Z.), and Clem Jones Centre for Ageing Dementia Research (V.A.), The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; School of Medical Science and Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University Gold Coast Campus, Queensland, Australia (S.K.).
Venue
Anesthesiology
Published
2019-09
Volume
131
Issue
3
Pages
555-568
ISSN
0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2962855124
Cited by
21
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Anesthesiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
neomorphic mutations, isoflurane anesthesia, anesthesia recovery, presynaptic proteins, neuromuscular junction, synaptic function, Drosophila melanogaster, excitatory junction potentials, larval development
MeSH terms
Anesthesia Recovery Period, Animals, Drosophila melanogaster, Female, Isoflurane, Mutation, Neuromuscular Junction, Anesthetics, Inhalation, Drosophila Proteins, Qa-SNARE Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review