Cited by 190Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyNutrition and Health in AgingSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nutritional Status and Mortality in the Critically Ill*

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The association between nutritional status and mortality in critically ill patients is unclear based on the current literature. To clarify this relation, we analyzed the association between nutrition and mortality in a large population of critically ill patients and hypothesized that mortality would be impacted by nutritional status. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Single academic medical center. PATIENTS: Six thousand five hundred eighteen adults treated in medical and surgical ICUs between 2004 and 2011. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All cohort patients received a formal, in-person, standardized evaluation by a registered dietitian. The exposure of interest, malnutrition, was categorized as nonspecific malnutrition, protein-energy malnutrition, or well nourished and determined by data related to anthropometric measurements, biochemical indicators, clinical signs of malnutrition, malnutrition risk factors, and metabolic stress. The primary outcome was all-cause 30-day mortality determined by the Social Security Death Master File. Associations between nutrition groups and mortality were estimated by bivariable and multivariable logistic regression models. Adjusted odds ratios were estimated with inclusion of covariate terms thought to plausibly interact with both nutrition status and mortality. We used propensity score matching on baseline characteristics to reduce residual confounding of the nutrition status category assignment. In the cohort, nonspecific malnutrition was present in 56%, protein-energy malnutrition was present in 12%, and 32% were well nourished. The 30-day and 90-day mortality rates for the cohort were 19.1% and 26.6%, respectively. Nutritional status is a significant predictor of 30-day mortality following adjustment for age, gender, race, medical versus surgical patient type, Deyo-Charlson index, acute organ failure, vasopressor use, and sepsis: nonspecific malnutrition 30-day mortality odds ratio, 1.17 (95% CI, 1.01-1.37); protein-energy malnutrition 30-day mortality odds ratio, 2.10 (95% CI, 1.70-2.59), all relative to patients without malnutrition. In the matched cohort, the adjusted odds of 30-day mortality in the group of propensity score-matched patients with protein-energy malnutrition was two-fold greater than that of patients without malnutrition. CONCLUSION: In a large population of critically ill adults, an association exists between nutrition status and mortality.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ccm.0000000000001306

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a large cohort study (6,518 patients), Mogensen et al. found a significant increase in 30, 90 and 365 days mortality in the nonspecific and protein calorie malnourished groups compared with non-malnourished patients.

    “In a large cohort study (6,518 patients), Mogensen et al. (21) followed survival in non-malnourished (2,123 patients), non-specific malnourished (3,641 patients) and protein calorie malnourished patients (754 patients) and found a significant increase in 30, 90 and 365 days mortality in the nonspecific and protein calorie malnourished groups”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. Westergren, 2008, J Nutr Health Aging, 12, 39, 10.1007/BF02982162 · DOI
  2. Planas, 2004, Clin Nutr, 23, 1016, 10.1016/j.clnu.2004.01.003 · DOI
  3. Kruizenga, 2003, Clin Nutr, 22, 147, 10.1054/clnu.2002.0611 · DOI
  4. Pirlich, 2006, Clin Nutr, 25, 563, 10.1016/j.clnu.2006.03.005 · DOI · Paper page
  5. McWhirter, 1994, BMJ, 308, 945, 10.1136/bmj.308.6934.945 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Kondrup, 2002, Clin Nutr, 21, 461, 10.1054/clnu.2002.0585 · DOI
  7. Rasmussen, 2004, Clin Nutr, 23, 1009, 10.1016/j.clnu.2004.01.001 · DOI
  8. OFlynn, 2005, Clin Nutr, 24, 1078, 10.1016/j.clnu.2005.08.012 · DOI
  9. Norman, 2008, Clin Nutr, 27, 5, 10.1016/j.clnu.2007.10.007 · DOI
  10. Correia, 2003, Clin Nutr, 22, 235, 10.1016/S0261-5614(02)00215-7 · DOI
  11. Cederholm, 1995, Am J Med, 98, 67, 10.1016/S0002-9343(99)80082-5 · DOI
  12. Reilly, 1988, JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 12, 371, 10.1177/0148607188012004371 · DOI
  13. Robinson, 2015, Crit Care Med, 43, 87, 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000602 · DOI
  14. Giner, 1996, Nutrition, 12, 23, 10.1016/0899-9007(95)00015-1 · DOI
  15. Cartin-Ceba, 2007, Crit Care Med, 35, 2420, 10.1097/01.CCM.0000281856.78526.F4 · DOI
  16. Dvir, 2006, Clin Nutr, 25, 37, 10.1016/j.clnu.2005.10.010 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Thomas, 1979, Intensive Care Med, 5, 156, 10.1007/BF01683201 · DOI
  18. Zager, 2011, Chest, 139, 1368, 10.1378/chest.10-2594 · DOI
  19. Swails, 1996, J Am Diet Assoc, 96, 370, 10.1016/S0002-8223(96)00101-0 · DOI
  20. Blackburn, 1977, JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 1, 11, 10.1177/014860717700100111 · DOI
  21. Simopoulos, 1986, Annu Rev Public Health, 7, 481, 10.1146/annurev.pu.07.050186.002405 · DOI
  22. Fleisch, 1951, Helv Med Acta, 18, 23
  23. Karkeck, 1984, Newsletter, 3, 6
  24. McClave, 2009, JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 33, 277, 10.1177/0148607109335234 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Liu, 2014, JAMA, 312, 90, 10.1001/jama.2014.5804 · DOI
  26. Iwashyna, 2014, Med Care, 52, e39, 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318268ac86 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Bellomo, 2004, Crit Care, 8, R204, 10.1186/cc2872 · DOI
  28. Thickett, 2015, BMJ Open Respir Res, 2, e000074, 10.1136/bmjresp-2014-000074 · DOI
  29. Drahos, 2013, Ann Epidemiol, 23, 291, 10.1016/j.annepidem.2013.02.005 · DOI
  30. Angus, 2001, Crit Care Med, 29, 1303, 10.1097/00003246-200107000-00002 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Dreyfus, 2013, Cancer Epidemiol, 37, 191, 10.1016/j.canep.2012.11.001 · DOI
  32. Purtle, 2014, Crit Care Med, 42, 918, 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000118 · DOI
  33. Singh, 2003, Am J Public Health, 93, 1137, 10.2105/AJPH.93.7.1137 · DOI
  34. Kind, 2014, Ann Intern Med, 161, 765, 10.7326/M13-2946 · DOI
  35. Horkan, 2015, Crit Care Med, 43, 354, 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000706 · DOI
  36. Doweiko, 1991, JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 15, 476, 10.1177/0148607191015004476 · DOI
  37. Schols, 1998, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 157, 1791, 10.1164/ajrccm.157.6.9705017 · DOI
  38. Anker, 1997, Lancet, 349, 1050, 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07015-8 · DOI
  39. Lawson, 2001, J Ren Nutr, 11, 16, 10.1016/S1051-2276(01)85914-8 · DOI
  40. De Lima, 1998, Ren Fail, 20, 581, 10.3109/08860229809045150 · DOI
  41. Caregaro, 1996, Am J Clin Nutr, 63, 602, 10.1093/ajcn/63.4.602 · DOI
  42. Phang, 1996, Can J Surg, 39, 212
  43. Alberda, 2009, Intensive Care Med, 35, 1728, 10.1007/s00134-009-1567-4 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Stenholm, 2008, Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care, 11, 693, 10.1097/MCO.0b013e328312c37d · DOI · Paper page
  45. Jordao, 2004, Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord, 28, 1451, 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802781 · DOI
  46. Tolzman, 2014, WMJ, 113, 139
  47. White, 2012, J Acad Nutr Diet, 112, 730, 10.1016/j.jand.2012.03.012 · DOI
  48. Ferguson, 1999, Nutrition, 15, 458, 10.1016/S0899-9007(99)00084-2 · DOI
  49. Ingenbleek, 1985, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 55, 91
  50. Buzby, 1980, Am J Surg, 139, 160, 10.1016/0002-9610(80)90246-9 · DOI
  51. Laporte, 2001, J Nutr Health Aging, 5, 292
  52. Kaiser, 2010, J Am Geriatr Soc, 58, 1734, 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03016.x · DOI · Paper page
  53. van Venrooij, 2011, J Am Diet Assoc, 111, 1924, 10.1016/j.jada.2011.09.009 · DOI
  54. Quan, 2011, Am J Epidemiol, 173, 676, 10.1093/aje/kwq433 · DOI
  55. Jensen, 2010, JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 34, 156, 10.1177/0148607110361910 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mogensen, K. M., Robinson, M. K., Casey, J. D., Gunasekera, N. S., Moromizato, T., Rawn, J. D., & Christopher, K. B.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Okinawa Hokubu Hospital (JP)
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2015-12
Volume
43
Issue
12
Pages
2605-2615
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2323887451
Cited by
190
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 2
FWCI
14.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
nutritional status, malnutrition, protein-energy malnutrition, critically ill patients, mortality, intensive care unit, 30-day mortality, nutritional risk factors, metabolic stress
MeSH terms
Academic Medical Centers, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Male, Middle Aged, Nutritional Status, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Factors, Comorbidity, Critical Illness, Malnutrition, Propensity Score

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review