Cited by 45Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy

The effect of patient ethnicity on the accuracy of peripheral pulse oximetry in patients with COVID-19 pneumonitis: A single-centre, retrospective analysis

Open access
Wiles, M. D., El‐Nayal, A., Elton, G., Malaj, M., Winterbottom, J., Gillies, C., Moppett, I. K., Bauchmuller, K.·2022·Anaesthesia

Abstract

Summary Pulse oximetry is used widely to titrate oxygen therapy and for triage in patients who are critically ill. However, there are concerns regarding the accuracy of pulse oximetry in patients with COVID‐19 pneumonitis and in patients who have a greater degree of skin pigmentation. We aimed to determine the impact of patient ethnicity on the accuracy of peripheral pulse oximetry in patients who were critically ill with COVID‐19 pneumonitis by conducting a retrospective observational study comparing paired measurements of arterial oxygen saturation measured by co‐oximetry on arterial blood gas analysis (SaO 2 ) and the corresponding peripheral oxygenation saturation measured by pulse oximetry (S p O 2 ). Bias was calculated as the mean difference between SaO 2 and S p O 2 measurements and limits of agreement were calculated as bias ±1.96 SD. Data from 194 patients (135 White ethnic origin, 34 Asian ethnic origin, 19 Black ethnic origin and 6 other ethnic origin) were analysed consisting of 6216 paired SaO 2 and S p O 2 measurements. Bias (limits of agreement) between SaO 2 and S p O 2 measurements was 0.05% (−2.21–2.30). Patient ethnicity did not alter this to a clinically significant degree: 0.28% (1.79–2.35), −0.33% (−2.47–2.35) and −0.75% (−3.47–1.97) for patients of White, Asian and Black ethnic origin, respectively. In patients with COVID‐19 pneumonitis, S p O 2 measurements showed a level of agreement with SaO 2 values that was in line with previous work, and this was not affected by patient ethnicity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/anae.15581

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies have shown a positive bias in oxygen saturation measurements in patients with darkly pigmented skin, particularly under low saturation conditions.

    “Recent studies have shown a positive bias in oxygen saturation measurements in patients with darkly pigmented skin, particularly under low saturation conditions.”
  • More recent studies have revealed that dark skin pigmentation influences the accuracy and performance of pulse oximeter devices, resulting in overestimations, with increased incidence in the risk for occult hypoxemia (SO2<88% despite normal SpO2>92%).

    “More recent studies have also revealed that dark skin pigmentation influences the accuracy and performance of pulse oximeters devices, resulting in overestimations [17,49,50,51,52,53] with increased incidence in the risk for occult hypoxemia (SO2<88% despite normal SpO2>92%) [54,55].”
  • The main reason for the upsurge of publications in 2021 may be attributed to the increase of pulse oximetry for triage in patients because of the COVID-19 pandemic and recent concern about accuracy across all skin types.

    “The main reason for this surge may be attributed to the increase of this technique for triage in patients because of the current COVID-19 pandemic [12,13,14,15,16,17], and also because of the recent concern about the accuracy of these devices across all skin types [20,57,58,59,60,61].”
  • Ancestry descriptors were used in 11 studies (29.73%).

    “On the other hand, ancestry descriptors were used in 11 studies (29.73%) [17,21,23,24,41,51,53,61,75,82,93]”
  • A study in patients with acute COVID-19 pneumonia found a small bias between arterial blood gas analysis SaO2 and SpO2 measurements of 0.28%, −0.33% and −0.75% for 194 patients of "White" (135), "Asian" (34) and "Black" (19) ethnic origin, respectively.

    “Besides, another study was performed in patients with acute COVID-19 pneumonia to find out a relationship between patient ancestry and the accuracy of pulse oximetry found a small bias between arterial blood gas analysis SaO2 and SpO2 measurements of 0.28%, −0.33% and −0.75% for 194 patients of “White” (135), “Asian” (34) and “Black” (19) ethnic origin, respectively, [17].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wiles, M. D., El‐Nayal, A., Elton, G., Malaj, M., Winterbottom, J., Gillies, C., Moppett, I. K., & Bauchmuller, K.
Affiliations
  • Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Department of Critical Care Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Sheffield UK
Corresponding author
Wiles, M. D.
Venue
Anaesthesia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-09-20
Volume
77
Issue
2
Pages
143-152
ISSN
  • 0003-2409 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2044
OpenAlex
W3200483630
Cited by
45
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 3
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Anaesthesia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Keywords
pulse oximetry accuracy, COVID-19 pneumonitis, patient ethnicity, skin pigmentation, arterial oxygen saturation, co-oximetry, arterial blood gases, critically ill patients
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Oxygen Saturation, Critical Care, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Oximetry, Oxygen Inhalation Therapy, Retrospective Studies, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review