Cited by 58Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareMachine Learning in Healthcare

Machine intelligence in cardiovascular medicine

Miller, D. Douglas·2020·Cardiology in Review

Abstract

The computer science technology trend called artificial intelligence (AI) is not new. Both machine learning and deep learning AI applications have recently begun to impact cardiovascular medicine. Scientists working in the AI domain have long recognized the importance of data quality and provenance to AI algorithm efficiency and accuracy. A diverse array of cardiovascular raw data sources of variable quality—electronic medical records, radiological picture archiving and communication systems, laboratory results, omics, etc.—are available to train AI algorithms for predictive modeling of clinical outcomes (in-hospital mortality, acute coronary syndrome risk stratification, etc.), accelerated image interpretation (edge detection, tissue characterization, etc.) and enhanced phenotyping of heterogeneous conditions (heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, hypertension, etc.). A number of software as medical device narrow AI products for cardiac arrhythmia characterization and advanced image deconvolution are now Food and Drug Administration approved, and many others are in the pipeline. Present and future health professionals using AI-infused analytics and wearable devices have 3 critical roles to play in their informed development and ethical application in practice: (1) medical domain experts providing clinical context to computer and data scientists, (2) data stewards assuring the quality, relevance and provenance of data inputs, and (3) real-time and post-hoc interpreters of AI black box solutions and recommendations to patients. The next wave of so-called contextual adaption AI technologies will more closely approximate human decision-making, potentially augmenting cardiologists’ real-time performance in emergency rooms, catheterization laboratories, imaging suites, and clinics. However, before such higher order AI technologies are adopted in the clinical setting and by healthcare systems, regulatory agencies, and industry must jointly develop robust AI standards of practice and transparent technology insertion rule sets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/crd.0000000000000294

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Health professionals using AI technologies have three key ethical roles to play in their practices: (1) as medical domain experts who should provide computer and data scientists with the clinical context they need, (2) as gatekeepers for data quality who ensure that data inputs are relevant, accurate and sourced appropriately, and (3) as interpreters of AI black-box solutions who make real-time и

    “Health professionals using AI technologies have three key ethical roles to play in their practices: (1) as medical domain experts who should provide computer and data scientists with the clinical context they need, (2) as gatekeepers for data quality who ensure that data inputs are relevant, accurate and sourced appropriately, and (3) as interpreters of AI black-box solutions who make real-time”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, D. D.
Affiliations
Augusta University (US)
Corresponding author
Miller, D. Douglas
Venue
Cardiology in Review
Published
2020-03
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
53-64
ISSN
1061-5377 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3004640731
Cited by
58
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cardiology in Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
artificial intelligence in cardiology, machine learning, deep learning, data provenance, clinical outcome prediction, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, software as a medical device, wearable devices, explainable AI, AI regulation
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Cardiology, Cardiovascular Diseases, Humans, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review