Cited by 56Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsMaternal and fetal healthcare

Genetic Risk Factors for Placental Abruption: A HuGE Review and Meta-Analysis

Zdoukopoulos, Nikos, Zintzaras, Elias·2008·Epidemiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the precise pathophysiology that leads to placental abruption is unknown, there is evidence supporting a genetic etiology. METHODS: We searched PubMed and systematically reviewed all case-control studies that investigated the association between genetic variants and placental abruption. Pooled genetic risks were estimated using fixed and random effects odds ratios. RESULTS: Twenty-two articles, examining a total of 14 gene polymorphisms were identified. Seven polymorphisms (F5 Arg506Gln, F5 Met385Thr, F2 G20210A, MTHFR A1298C, MTHFD1 Arg653Gln, NOS3 Glu298Asp, AGT Met235Thr) show significant association in individual studies. Six of the 7 (all except F5Met385Thr) were studied more than once and we therefore included them in our meta-analyses. A positive association under the dominant model was found for the F5 Arg506Gln and F2 G20210A polymorphisms. The random-effects odds ratio for the F5 Arg506Gln polymorphism was 3.4 (95% confidence interval = 1.4-8.3) and the fixed-effects odds ratio for the F2 G20210A polymorphism was 6.7 (3.2-13). CONCLUSION: Considering the multifactorial etiology of abruption and the relatively small numbers of studies and participants, this review provides only the first clues of possible genetic causes. Larger case-control studies that include gene-gene and gene-environment interactions may help to elucidate the genetics of placental abruption further.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ede.0b013e3181635694

Cites

116 of 116 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zdoukopoulos, N., & Zintzaras, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Thessaly (GR)
  • Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Zdoukopoulos, Nikos
  • Zintzaras, Elias
Venue
Epidemiology
Published
2008-03
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
309-323
ISSN
1044-3983 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000950416
Cited by
56
References
116
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Thessaly Institutional Repository (University of Thessaly) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
Keywords
placental abruption, genetic risk factors, genetic polymorphism, MTHFR A1298C, genetic association, case-control study
MeSH terms
Abruptio Placentae, Female, Genotype, Humans, Polymorphism, Genetic, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies, Oxidative Stress, Thrombophilia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review