Cited by 110Sleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and related disordersWorkplace Health and Well-being

The impact of work schedules, home, and work demands on self-reported sleep in registered nurses

Geiger-Brown, Jeanne, Trinkoff, Alison, Rogers, Valerie E.·2011·Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship of work schedules to self-reported restless and inadequate sleep in a large population-based sample of registered nurses. METHODS: Cross-sectional mailed survey (n = 2246). Work schedule measures included hours worked per day and per week, weekends per month, shift, frequency of quick returns, mandatory overtime or on-call hours, and circadian mismatch, with indexing to reflect overall schedule adversity. Odds of restless and inadequate sleep related to work schedule components are reported, adjusted for age, childcare, and other domestic responsibilities and physical and psychosocial work demands. RESULTS: Odds of inadequate and restless sleep showed a clear dose effect for adversity of work schedule, even when adjusted for age and home demands. Odds were attenuated after adjustment for work demands. CONCLUSIONS: Current scheduling practices and high work demands negatively impact nurses' sleep and may be partially explained by exposure to work demands.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jom.0b013e31820c3f87

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For nurses, shift work and long work hours are related to adverse health outcomes and indicators of reduced functioning.

    “For nurses, shift work and long work hours have been shown to be related to adverse health outcomes and indicators of reduced functioning.208–217”

    From Sleep, Health, and Society (2017) · cites this paper as [217]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geiger-Brown, J., Trinkoff, A., & Rogers, V. E.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
Geiger-Brown, Jeanne
Venue
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
Published
2011-03
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
303-307
ISSN
1076-2752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085352629
Cited by
110
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (R01 OH07554)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
sleep quality, restless sleep, insufficient sleep, shift work, work schedules, registered nurses, job demands, mandatory overtime, on-call hours, family responsibilities, child care, occupational health
MeSH terms
Child, Child Care, Cross-Sectional Studies, Household Work, Humans, Middle Aged, Nurses, Psychomotor Agitation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep Wake Disorders, Odds Ratio, Occupational Health, Workload, Dyssomnias, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review