Cited by 148Muscle Physiology and DisordersMuscle metabolism and nutritionNutrition and Health in Aging

Anabolic and catabolic pathways regulating skeletal muscle mass

Open access
McCarthy, John J, Esser, Karyn A·2010·Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to discuss recent findings as they pertain to anabolic and catabolic-signaling pathways involved in the regulation of adult skeletal muscle mass. RECENT FINDINGS: Research conducted over the past few years has continued to refine our understanding of the pathways that govern skeletal muscle mass, in particular the mTOR, FoxO and NF-kappaB pathways. Alternative signaling pathways have also emerged as important regulators of muscle mass such as the beta-catenin pathway. SUMMARY: A better understanding of the anabolic and catabolic processes which regulate skeletal muscle mass is critical for the development of more effective therapeutics to prevent the loss of muscle with disuse, aging and disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mco.0b013e32833781b5

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCarthy, J. J., & Esser, K. A.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Esser, Karyn A
Venue
Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care
Published
2010-05
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
230-235
ISSN
1363-1950 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2073720580
Cited by
148
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR045617)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
Keywords
skeletal muscle mass, muscle anabolism, muscle catabolism, mTOR signaling, FoxO signaling, NF-κB signaling, β-catenin signaling, muscle atrophy, sarcopenia, aging, myopathy
MeSH terms
Forkhead Box Protein O1, Organ Size, Signal Transduction, NF-kappa B, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Muscle, Skeletal, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, beta Catenin, Forkhead Transcription Factors, TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review