CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 15

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Advances in the understanding of specific metabolic rates of major organs and tissues in humans

Müller, Manfred J., Wang, ZiMian, Heymsfield, Steven B., Schautz, Britta, Bosy-Westphal, Anja·2013·Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care
DOI 10.1097/mco.0b013e328363bdf9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose of review To present recent evidence on organ and tissue metabolic rates in humans to explain the variance in resting energy expenditure (REE). Recent findings In humans, present knowledge on specific metabolic activities (i.e. ki-values) refers to seven organs and tissues - brain, heart, liver, kidneys, skeletal muscle, adipose tissue and residual mass - with ki-values of 240, 440, 200, 440, 13, 4.5 and 12 kcal/kg/day, provided by Elia in 1992. Detailed body composition data, as derived from whole body MRI together with measurements of whole body REE, were used to validate ki-values in nonobese, healthy and middle-aged adults. There is no sex difference, but minor, that is 2 and 3% deviations are found for age above 55 years and obesity, respectively. By contrast, in adolescents, differences of about 100 kcal/day or 7.3% of measured REE were observed. There is first evidence for changes in ki-values with either weight loss or weight regain after weight loss. Altogether these data suggest that in adolescence and at age above 55 years, in the obese and with weight change, organ and tissue masses differ in cellularity and/or their specific metabolic rates. Presently, direct assessment of specific organ and tissue metabolic rates in humans by either NMR spectroscopy or PET, together with detailed body composition analysis, has not been performed systematically. Summary We need to become more skilled in methods and models used for detailed body composition analysis togeth…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mco.0b013e328363bdf9

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Muller, 2002, Obesity Rev, 3, 113, 10.1046/j.1467-789X.2002.00057.x · DOI
  2. Holliday, 1967, Pediat Res, 1, 185, 10.1203/00006450-196705000-00005 · DOI
  3. Javad, 2010, Am J Clin Nutr, 91, 907, 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28512 · DOI
  4. Muller, 2011, PLoS One, 6, e22732, 10.1371/journal.pone.0022732 · DOI
  5. Later, 2010, utr, 64, 1035
  6. Wang, 2012, Obesity, 20, 95, 10.1038/oby.2011.256 · DOI
  7. Later, 2008, Am J Clin Nutr, 92, 1369
  8. Wang, 2010, Am J Hum Biol, 22, 476, 10.1002/ajhb.21020 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Bosy-Westphal, 2009, Am J Clin Nutr, 90, 993, 10.3945/ajcn.2008.27402 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Hall, 2011, Lancet, 378, 826, 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60812-X · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Müller, M. J., Wang, Z., Heymsfield, S. B., Schautz, B., & Bosy-Westphal, A.
Venue
Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2013-08
Pages
1
ISSN
1363-1950
DOI
10.1097/mco.0b013e328363bdf9
Cited by
15
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review