Cited by 18Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsThyroid and Parathyroid SurgeryAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

Alternative routes of levothyroxine administration for hypothyroidism

Ritter, Megan J., Gupta, Suruchi, Hennessey, James V.·2020·Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes & Obesity

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of the article is to present the basics of oral levothyroxine (LT4) absorption, reasons why patients may have persistently elevated serum thyroid stimulation hormone (TSH) levels, and alternative strategies for LT4 dosing. RECENT FINDINGS: Although oral LT4 tablets are most commonly used for thyroid hormone replacement in patients with hypothyroidism, case studies report that liquid oral LT4, intravenous, intramuscular, and rectal administration of LT4 can successfully treat refractory hypothyroidism. SUMMARY: Hypothyroidism is one of the most common endocrine disorders encountered by primary care physicians and endocrinologists. LT4 is one of the most widely prescribed medications in the world and it is the standard of care treatment for hypothyroidism. Generally, hypothyroid patients will be treated with LT4 tablets to be taken orally, and monitoring will occur with routine serum thyroid tests, including TSH concentrations. However, many patients fail to maintain serum TSH levels in the target range while managed on oral LT4 tablets. A subset of these patients would be considered to have poorly controlled hypothyroidism, sometimes termed refractory hypothyroidism. For these patients, optimization of ingestion routines and alternative formulations and routes of administration of LT4 can be considered, including oral liquid, intravenous, intramuscular, and even rectal formulations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/med.0000000000000558

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The appropriate IV equivalent dose is estimated to be 48% to 74% of a previously adequate oral LT4 dose.

    “Of note, the appropriate IV equivalent dose is estimated to be 48% to 74% of a previously adequate oral LT4 dose (237).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ritter, M. J., Gupta, S., & Hennessey, J. V.
Affiliations
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Ritter, Megan J.
  • Gupta, Suruchi
Venue
Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes & Obesity
Published
2020-07-28
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
318-322
ISSN
  • 1752-296X (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-2978
OpenAlex
W3046269416
Cited by
18
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Endocrinology Diabetes and Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
Keywords
levothyroxine, hypothyroidism, refractory hypothyroidism, alternative routes of administration, thyroid-stimulating hormone, thyroid hormone replacement, dose optimization
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Dosage Forms, Drug Administration Routes, Drug Compounding, Gels, Humans, Hypothyroidism, Tablets, Thyrotropin, Thyroxine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review