The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guidelines for Designing and Evaluating Feasibility Pilot Studies
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Pilot studies test the feasibility of methods and procedures to be used in larger-scale studies. Although numerous articles describe guidelines for the conduct of pilot studies, few have included specific feasibility indicators or strategies for evaluating multiple aspects of feasibility. In addition, using pilot studies to estimate effect sizes to plan sample sizes for subsequent randomized controlled trials has been challenged; however, there has been little consensus on alternative strategies. METHODS: In Section 1, specific indicators (recruitment, retention, intervention fidelity, acceptability, adherence, and engagement) are presented for feasibility assessment of data collection methods and intervention implementation. Section 1 also highlights the importance of examining feasibility when adapting an intervention tested in mainstream populations to a new more diverse group. In Section 2, statistical and design issues are presented, including sample sizes for pilot studies, estimates of minimally important differences, design effects, confidence intervals (CI) and nonparametric statistics. An in-depth treatment of the limits of effect size estimation as well as process variables is presented. Tables showing CI around parameters are provided. With small samples, effect size, completion and adherence rate estimates will have large CI. CONCLUSION: This commentary offers examples of indicators for evaluating feasibility, and of the limits of effect size estimation in pilot studies. As demonstrated, most pilot studies should not be used to estimate effect sizes, provide power calculations for statistical tests or perform exploratory analyses of efficacy. It is hoped that these guidelines will be useful to those planning pilot/feasibility studies before a larger-scale study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, the sample size of the present study falls within the range recommended for pilot studies (Lancaster et al., 2004; Teresi et al., 2022).”
From Evaluation of effectiveness and acceptability of a psychological treatment for smoking cessation combined with a smartphone App: A pilot study (2024) · cites this paper as Teresi et al., 2022
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The study aimed to recruit 80 participants to allow a 25% attrition rate and a final sample of 40 participants, appropriate for pilot feasibility studies (Creswell & Creswell, 2022; Teresi et al., 2022).”
From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Tele-Counselling Program With Care Partners of Persons Living With Dementia: A Pilot Feasibility RCT. (2026) · cites this paper as Teresi et al., 2022
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How we design feasibility studies
Bowen, D. J., Kreuter, M., Spring, B., Cofta-Woerpel, L., Linnan, L., Weiner, D., Bakken, S., Kaplan, C. P., Squiers, L., Fabrizio, C., et al. (2009) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002 · Cited by 4,021
Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., Ader, D., Fries, J. F., Bruce, B., & Rose, M. (2007) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55 · Cited by 3,118
Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study
Julious, S. A. (2005) · Pharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1002/pst.185 · Cited by 3,068
CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials
on behalf of the PAFS consensus group, Eldridge, S. M., Chan, C. L., Campbell, M. J., Bond, C. M., Hopewell, S., Thabane, L., & Lancaster, G. A. (2016) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-016-0105-8 · Cited by 2,843 · cited 1×
“Feasibility indicators can include completion rates and times for speci fi c components, perceived burden, incon-venience, and reasons for noncompletion, 9 all of which may inform assessment protocol modi fi cation.”
BackgroundBellg, A. J., Treatment Fidelity Workgroup of the NIH Behavior Change Consortium, Borrelli, B., Resnick, B., Hecht, J., Minicucci, D. S., Ory, M., Ogedegbe, G., Orwig, D., Ernst, D., et al. (2004) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.23.5.443 · Cited by 2,620
Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice
Lancaster, G. A., Dodd, S., & Williamson, P. R. (2004) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/j..2002.384.doc.x · Cited by 2,572
Revicki, D. A., Hays, R. D., Cella, D. F., & Sloan, J. A. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012 · Cited by 2,384
Whitehead, A. L., Julious, S. A., Cooper, C. L., & Campbell, M. J. (2016) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0962280215588241 · Cited by 1,936
The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research
Leon, A. C., Davis, L. L., & Kraemer, H. C. (2011) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.10.008 · Cited by 1,917
Eldridge, S. M., Lancaster, G. A., Campbell, M. J., Thabane, L., Hopewell, S., Coleman, C. L., & Bond, C. M. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150205 · Cited by 1,581
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Jones, 2016, Differential item functioning in Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) physical functioning short forms, Psychol Test Assess Model, 58, 371
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 733
Lindley, L. M., & Budge, S. L. (2025) · International Journal of Transgender Health · doi:10.1080/26895269.2025.2570422 · Cited by 2
Djafari, Y., Arshi, A. R., & Rajabi, H. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-19228-8 · Cited by 2
Luberto, C. M., Lopes, M., Cloutier, J. G., Hall, D. L., Wood, M. J., Schuman‐Olivier, Z., Hoeppner, B. B., & Park, E. R. (2025) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/tbm/ibaf064 · Cited by 2
Kraemer, K. M., Litrownik, D., Wayne, P. M., Richardson, C. R., Bhomia, N., Kadri, R., Rist, P. M., Ngo, L. H., Moy, M. L., & Yeh, G. Y. (2025) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/74118 · Cited by 3
“In line with guidelines for pilot trials [72,73], we assessed changes in patient-centered outcomes, including”
Bialostocki, L. S., Adhia, D. B., Mudiyanselage, D. R., Smith, M. L., Çakmak, Y. Ö., Ridder, D. D., Mani, R., & Mathew, J. (2025) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/78806 · Cited by 2
“Each metric will be reported as a point estimate with 95% CIs, and progression will be discussed in light of these thresholds [60,144,145].”
Anshasi, H. A., Almazrouei, H., Rashed, N., Salem, R., Suhail, M., & Abdulla, A. F. A. (2025) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-025-24988-z · Cited by 2
“Given the limited sample size, formal tests of reliability or validity (e.g., Cronbach’s alpha) were not conducted, as pilot studies are underpowered for inferential statistics and hypothesis testing [26].”
Stavrinoudis, T. A., Kakarougkas, C., & Georgopoulou, A. (2025) · Businesses · doi:10.3390/businesses5040054 · Cited by 2
“In the second phase, the data from the initial analysis were organised to design a prototype questionnaire, which was then tested through a pilot study (Teresi et al., 2022) with four hotel employees.”
Webb, M. A., & van Gelder, J. (2025) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-025-01709-2 · Cited by 3
Mentored multimodal prehabilitation for aortic aneurysm surgery: a pilot randomised controlled trial
Bidd, H., Wong, D. J. N., Colville, G., Banugo, P., Baldwin, M., Waring, H., Zucco, L., Radcliffe, G., Zayed, H. A., & El‐Boghdadly, K. (2025) · Perioperative Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13741-025-00625-6 · Cited by 2
“…considerations such as participant flow, funding constraints, and the number of participants needed to reasonably evaluate feasibility goals(Yi et al. 2023), with other feasibility studies published with similar recruitment numbers per group (Coca-Martinez et al. 2024; Teresi et al. 2022).”
van der Boom, B., Donker, T., Beurs, D. P. D., Smit, A. C., van der Krieke, L., Steures, P., Pietersen, R., van Meeteren, M., Arntz, A. R., & Riper, H. M. (2025) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2025.100897 · Cited by 5
“The aim of our study was to assess if our newly developed VC intervention could be delivered as intended and whether participants would engage and adhere to its components (Teresi et al., 2021).”
Hunter, E. C. M., Ring, L., Gafoor, R., Morant, N. J., Lewis, G., Perkins, J., Dalrymple, N., Dumitru, A., Wong, C. L. M., Pizzo, E., et al. (2025) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-025-01742-1 · Cited by 2
“The current consensus on the appropriate statistical analyses in feasibility studies is summarized: “… most pilot studies should not be used to estimate effect sizes, provide power calculations for statistical tests or perform exploratory analyses of efficacy” [24].”
Wärnberg, M. G., Basak, D., Berg, J., Chatterjee, S., Felländer‐Tsai, L., Ghag, G. S., Juillard, C. J., Khajanchi, M. U., Khan, T., Mishra, A. K., et al. (2025) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099020 · Cited by 2
“We conclude that a full-scale cluster randomised trial is feasible after incorporating the lessons of this pilot study.”
Aston, V., Eley, E., Wong, D., Hill, A. J., Carragher, M., Rose, M. L., Pitt, R., & Pierce, J. E. (2025) · International Journal of Telerehabilitation · doi:10.63144/ijt.2025.6727 · Cited by 2
“Acceptability was considered independently of feasibility, although it is typically considered necessary for overall feasibility in many models (Teresi et al., 2022).”
Mathur, M., Yeragi, P., Prabhu, V., Marshall, A. N., Chow, J., Gaminian, A., Pomeroy, M., Markham, C. M., Chuang, R., & Sharma, S. V. (2025) · Childhood Obesity · doi:10.1177/21532176251403284 · Cited by 2
“50,51 In conclusion, both voucher and delivery models were feasible, but vouchers had higher acceptability.”
Ramadan, O. M. E., & Elsharkawy, N. B. (2026) · Nursing in Critical Care · doi:10.1111/nicc.70328 · Cited by 2
Oviedo, V., Alegría, L., Leonard, D., Cádiz, R., Brockmann, P., Repetto, P. B., Henríquez, M., Gonzalo Labarca, T., Carrasco, M., Moya, A. G., et al. (2026) · Intensive and Critical Care Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.iccn.2026.104349 · Cited by 2
Majumdar, J. R., Strauss, S. M., Strah, T. M., Mendez, C. M., Fromkin, J. B., Dannaoui, A., Caramore, A., O’Leary, J., Liou, K. T., & Barton‐Burke, M. (2026) · Seminars in Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.soncn.2026.152149 · Cited by 2
Wang, H., Sun, M., Xu, F., Wiley, J., Tang, S., & McCormack, B. (2026) · Asian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2026.104928 · Cited by 2
Fadlilah, S., Murdhiono, W. R., Dwidiyanti, M., Sugimoto, H., Fiqri, A. M., Lin, C. L., & Tsai, H. (2026) · Nursing Open · doi:10.1002/nop2.70486 · Cited by 2
Beehler, G. P., Funderburk, J. S., King, P., Wade, M., Goldstein, W. R., Murphy, J., Heapy, A. A., & Dollar, K. M. (2026) · Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings · doi:10.1007/s10880-026-10148-x · Cited by 2
“Due to our sample size, we did not use inferential statistics (Teresi et al., 2021).”
Ball, J., Nehme, Z., Wong, G. R., Yeoh, J., Brown, L., Martin, L., Okyere, D. O., Mahony, E., Kalman, J. M., Kistler, P. M., et al. (2026) · Heart · doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2025-327605 · Cited by 2
Contractor, A. A., Rosenfield, D., Almeida, I. M., Wang, S., Taylor, D. J., Weiss, N. H., & Shea, M. T. (2026) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2026.105087 · Cited by 2
“Additionally, the current study was an RCT comparing PPMT to an active control condition, which was conducted with limited resources and informs decisions and logistical issues for larger PPMT RCTs (Teresi et al., 2022).”
Late-life depression training for in-home aged care staff: A mixed-methods pilot study
Kelly, J., Dickins, M., Mackelprang, J. L., Numbers, K. T., Bhar, S. S., Schofield, P. E., & Davison, T. E. (2026) · Educational Gerontology · doi:10.1080/03601277.2026.2675408 · Cited by 2
Selzler, A., Davoodi, P. M., Klarenbach, S. W., Lam, N. N., Smith, T., Ackroyd, A., Wiebe, N., Corradetti, B., Ferdinand, S., Iyekekpolor, D., et al. (2023) · Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease · doi:10.1177/20543581231205340 · Cited by 2
“21”
MethodInfluentialMiranda, J. C., Sahadevan, K. J., Inayatullah, Q.-U. A., & Khan, R. K. (2023) · The Malaysian Journal of Qualitative Research · doi:10.61211/mjqr090202 · Cited by 2
Gabrielian, S. E., Hamilton, A. B., Gelberg, L., Koosis, E. R., Hoffmann, L., Carlson, D. M., & Young, A. S. (2024) · Implementation Research and Practice · doi:10.1177/26334895241236679 · Cited by 2
“We conceptualized feasibility to encompass intervention retention and treatment fi delity (Teresi et al., 2022).”
MethodSayegh, C. S., MacDonell, K. K., Iverson, E. F., Beard, B., CHANG, N. T., Vu, M. H., & Belzer, M. E. (2024) · BMC Digital Health · doi:10.1186/s44247-024-00069-w · Cited by 2
“Additionally, even if a pilot study is not sufficiently powered to detect statistically significant effects, it can produce estimates of effect sizes to plan for future, larger hypothesis testing studies [31].”
BackgroundAlqurashi, N., Bell, S., Carley, S. D., Lecky, F. E., & Body, R. M. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077191 · Cited by 3
Kelkar, A. H., Kerssens, C., Groblewski, N., Clancy, D., Close, S. D., Sullivan, L. M., Sherman-Manhard, D., Cutler, C. S., Wang, V. H., & Abel, G. A. (2024) · Bone Marrow Transplantation · doi:10.1038/s41409-024-02334-y · Cited by 2
“Prede fi ned targets for acceptable feasibility were set at a 66% retention rate and a maximum dissatisfaction rate of 20% [11, 12].”
Andrabi, M. S., Key, B. A., Francisco, M., Jeremiah, M., Mumba, M. N., Radhakrishnan, K., & Ball, K. (2024) · Public Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/phn.13370 · Cited by 2
Al-rashdan, R. A., Ta’an, W., Mukattash, T. L., & Williams, B. A. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0305209 · Cited by 2
“It should be noted that the responses yielded from this pilot study were excluded from the eventual sample as recommended by Ter-esi et al. [32].”
BackgroundDavies, K. F., Heering, T., Watts, M., & Duncan, M. J. (2024) · Sports · doi:10.3390/sports12080204 · Cited by 2
“Instead, researchers recommend sample size is based upon practical considerations, including participant flow and the number of participants needed to reasonably evaluate feasibility goals [45,46].”
BackgroundSeo, N. J., Brinkhoff, M., Fredendall, S., Coker‐Bolt, P., McGloon, K., & Humanitzki, E. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13163147 · Cited by 2
“While the strength of this study is an extended study duration of 2 years with daily procedures to investigate the long-term influence of TheraBracelet on a child with cerebral palsy, the major limitation is that this study is a case report involving only one child.”
BackgroundEvaluation of the usability and acceptability of the P-STEP® mobile app: feasibility study protocol
Worboys, H. M., Gray, L. J., Anthony, S., Hobson, R., Lucas, T. C. D., & Ng, G. A. (2024) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-024-01546-9 · Cited by 2
Silva, H. D. J., de Miranda, J. P., de Melo, C. S., Fonseca, L. S., Mascarenhas, R. D. O., Veloso, N. S., Silva, W. T., Bastone, A. D. C., & Oliveira, V. C. (2024) · Journal of Aging and Physical Activity · doi:10.1123/japa.2024-0026 · Cited by 2
Wooldridge, J. S., Soriano, E. C., Chu, G. M., Shirazi, A., Shapiro, D. N., Patterson, M., Kim, H.-C., & Herbert, M. S. (2024) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/60670 · Cited by 2
Watson, D. P., Singh, R. R., Taylor, L., Dennis, M. L., Grella, C. E., Johnstone, C., Browne, K., & Saldana, L. (2024) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1443409 · Cited by 2
Medford, E., Lane, S., Merriel, A., Sharp, A., & Care, A. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0311324 · Cited by 2
de Leeuwerk, M. D., ten Dam, S. T., van der Heide, M., Kruizenga, H., Geleijn, E., de Groot, V., van der Leeden, M., & van der Schaaf, M. (2025) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2025.2456583 · Cited by 1
“a sample size of at least 30 participants was required to evaluate feasibility goals [60]. the statistical package for the social sciences (sPss version 26) was used for the data analysis. study population characteristics were presented descriptively by mean ( SD ), median (iQR), and percentage. to…”
Hanley, A. W., Davis, A., Worts, P. R., & Pratscher, S. D. (2025) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-024-00548-5 · Cited by 2
“Consistent with recommendations for pilot studies, no post hoc p-value adjustments were made (Teresi et al., 2022).”
Lu, H., Liang, S.-Y., & Huang, Y.-C. (2025) · JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting · doi:10.2196/60333 · Cited by 2
Technology-Based Mental Health Interventions in Dementia Care: A Systematic Review
Carlo, L. B., Carlo, M. P. J., O’Donnell, A. J., & Estrada, L. V. (2025) · Journal of Gerontological Nursing · doi:10.3928/00989134-20250305-01 · Cited by 2
Apte, S., Ramachandra, P., Guruvare, S., Bhat, S. K., & Maiya, G. A. (2025) · Women & Health · doi:10.1080/03630242.2025.2480838 · Cited by 2
Musendo, D. J., Polack, S., Chirwa, B., Nkambule, E. S., Mukakagame, C., Chikanya, M., Nkhonjera, T. A., & Smythe, T. (2025) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci14050265 · Cited by 1
McDonough, S., Stephenson, A., Grimmett, C., Bennett, K., Coyle, N., Grealis, S., Kinneavy, C., FitzGerald, O., French, H., Stokes, M. J., et al. (2025) · HRB Open Research · doi:10.12688/hrbopenres.14002.2 · Cited by 2
“This is in line with recommendations where it is suggested that a sample size of n=30 is appropriate to answer the questions posed by a feasibility trial 67,68 .”
Harris, S., Jordan, J., Wilkinson, A., & Seaton, P. (2025) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-025-01649-x · Cited by 3
“The justification for this sample size is based on authoritative literature [20].”
Fidel, L. R., Berto, M. C., Turleque, L. P., García‐Palacios, A., & Suso‐Ribera, C. (2025) · Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2024.0582 · Cited by 2
“22 Eligibility criteria included.”
Trude, A. C. B., Rehman, Z., Wiloejo, S., McLean, K., Daza, L. C. V., & Rummo, P. E. (2025) · Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2025.07.003 · Cited by 2
Pharmacists’ Interventions in Virtual Diabetes Clinics: Cost-Effectiveness Feasibility Study
Al-Aqeel, S., Mutlaq, A., Al-Khalifa, N., Alnassar, D., Alghanim, R. A., Algarni, W., & Alshammari, S. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13172130 · Cited by 2
“The design of the feasibility study was in accordance with relevant guidelines [25,26].”
Operationalizing Depression Screening in Ambulatory Palliative Care: A Quality Improvement Project
Shalev, D., Patterson, M., Aytaman, Y. S., Moya-Tapia, M. A., Blinderman, C. D., Silva, M. D., & Reid, M. C. (2022) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.09.002 · Cited by 2
Capriles, I. F., Armijos, A., Angulo, A., Schojan, M., Wainberg, M. L., Bonz, A. G., Tol, W. A., & Greene, M. C. (2024) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph21040397 · Cited by 3
“This data can be used to evaluate and address challenges related to participant engagement and retention [17,18].”
BackgroundMethodGrech, J. L., Norman, I. J., Azzopardi, C., Grixti, M., & Sammut, R. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083235 · Cited by 1
Tripathi, T., Watson, J., Holmes, N. E., McCoy, J., Stump, H., & Hui, L. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7669354/v1 · Cited by 2
Jones, G. M., Castro‐Ramirez, F., Al‐Suwaidi, M., McGuire, T. C., & Herrmann, F. M. (2023) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/53268 · Cited by 1
“Future research should examine “healing attempt” in a between-subjects randomized feasibility trial, which would warrant a greater sample size of at least 30 participants per group (per foundational studies on feasibility studies that recommend this sample size) [47-49].”
Chae, D., Asami, K., Kim, J., Kim, K., Ryu, J., & Doorenbos, A. Z. (2024) · Research in Community and Public Health Nursing · doi:10.12799/rcphn.2023.00339 · Cited by 1
Wang, J., Cao, Y., Wei, X., Winkley, K., & Chang, Y. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0304707 · Cited by 1
Alexopoulos, A., Danus, S. M., Parish, A., Olsen, M. K., Batch, B. C., Thacker, C. R., Moylan, C. A., & Crowley, M. J. (2024) · Diabetes Therapy · doi:10.1007/s13300-024-01651-1 · Cited by 1
“In accordance with best practices for feasibility pilots [7], we used only descriptive statistics to summarize our data.”
Occupational Therapy for Adults With Acute Hand Conditions: A Mixed-Methods Feasibility Study
Sheerin, M., Galvin, R., Ryan, D., Carey, L., Whiston, A., Coughlan, A., & Morrissey, A. (2024) · OTJR Occupational Therapy Journal of Research · doi:10.1177/15394492241278668 · Cited by 1
“Literature suggests that sample size in feasibility studies should be based on practical considerations including participant flow, and the number of participants needed to reasonably evaluate feasibility goals (Teresi et al., 2022).”
Screti, C., Atkinson, L., Shaw, R. L., Muhammed, R., & Heath, G. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085576 · Cited by 1
Daemen, M., Boots, L. M. M., Oosterloo, M., de Vugt, M. E., & Duits, A. (2024) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2024.100782 · Cited by 1
Kehler, S., Abufarsakh, B., Seng, S., & Okoli, C. T. C. (2024) · Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association · doi:10.1177/10783903241303516 · Cited by 1
“A power analysis was not used to calculate the sample size, as this was a pilot study (Teresi et al., 2022).”
Aldighrir, W. M. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-04190-z · Cited by 3
“Different guidelines and recommendations were followed throughout the scale development process (Boateng et al., 2018; Clark & Watson, 2019; Teresi et al., 2022).”
Bennett, H., Mezzini, A., Proudman, S., Griggs, K. M., & Davison, K. (2025) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2025.2462765 · Cited by 2
“Due to uncertainty around recruitment rates in this population, we aimed to recruit between 12 and 30 participants, conforming to both research recommending a minimum of 12 participants per group for feasibility trials [29], and more recent guidelines for pilot studies [30].”
Singh, A., Cooley, M. E., Mazzola, E., Deeb, A. L., McAllister, M. A., Pezeshkian, F., DuMontier, C., Frain, L. N., Ugalde, P. A., Steimer, D. A., et al. (2025) · Journal of Geriatric Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102218 · Cited by 1
Hitz, A. C., Hubbling, M., Hodges, A., Campbell, E. H., Bangerter, A. K., & Polusny, M. A. (2025) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-024-01573-6 · Cited by 1
“Because large, prospective, longitudinal studies are costly and resource-intensive endeavors, it was necessary to first assess the feasibility of methods and procedures to be used in the larger study [25].”
Chepkirui, M., Kimego, D., Nzioki, C., Jowi, E. A., Opondo, C., & Agweyu, A. (2025) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-025-01610-y · Cited by 1
“Pilot studies are not powered like definitive trials [18, 19].”
Marques, E. A., Caliskan, O., Brooke-Wavell, K. S. F., & Folland, J. P. (2025) · Maturitas · doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2025.108246 · Cited by 1
Müller, P., Hofstetter, S., & Jahn, P. (2025) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/63089 · Cited by 1
“…or withdraw later In the context of research involving human participants, it is imperative to consider pragmatic factors such as financial resources and the maximum feasible number of participants in accordance with the guidelines for designing and evaluating feasibility pilot studies [49].”
Relearning Upper Limb Proprioception After Stroke Through Robotic Therapy: A Feasibility Analysis
Sidarta, A., Lim, Y. C., Kuah, C. W. K., Chua, K. S. G., & Ang, W. T. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm14072189 · Cited by 1
“Information related to recruitment, trial scheduling, tolerability and adherence, adverse events, and training gain or outcome measures were included as the indicators for feasibility [39].”
Schiek, H., Esch, T., & Hoetger, C. (2025) · Addiction Science & Clinical Practice · doi:10.1186/s13722-025-00559-w · Cited by 4
“Target sample size estimation was based on single-arm pilot studies evaluating interventions for smoking cessation [41, 44–46].”
Hunter, D. J., MacGregor, K., Shields, R., Black, A. M., Rezansoff, A., & Mohtadi, N. G. H. (2025) · Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine · doi:10.1097/jsm.0000000000001361 · Cited by 1
A Community-Based Approach to Refining the Enhancing Active Caregiver Training (EnACT) Intervention
Eaton, J., Neller, S. A., Cajavilca, M. F., Johnson, J. K., & Ellington, L. (2025) · Journal of Applied Gerontology · doi:10.1177/07334648251336536 · Cited by 1
“…prior literature describing preparation for successful implementation, participants indicated that facilitators of the EnACT intervention must be appropriately trained to deliver active engagement activities and adapt to the needs of the care partners (Nehrig et al., 2019; Teresi et al., 2022).”
Erasmus, P., Borrmann, M., Ali, A. T., Herta, S., Becker, J., Moriarty, G., & Meinlschmidt, G. (2025) · Archives of Public Health · doi:10.1186/s13690-025-01597-1 · Cited by 1
“…mental health trials for recruitment capabilities, data collection and randomization procedures, participant flow, adherence, and acceptability [49–53] and is still sufficiently large to estimate rough variance for continuous outcomes and trends in expected direction and implementation of outcome…”
Lockman, J. D., Pisani, A. R., Angerer, B. P., Graham, A. C., Henry, J., & Lloyd, F. (2025) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.70021 · Cited by 1
Debeuf, R., Claeys, R., Berlanger, M., Bunt, M., Debain, A., Vlieger, D. D., Eggermont, M., Firouzi, M., Guida, S., Kostková, K., et al. (2025) · JMIR Serious Games · doi:10.2196/69400 · Cited by 1
“…the study was a feasibility study, no a priori sample size calculations were performed, and a sample of 15 participants was chosen based on practical considerations and the number of participants needed to reasonably evaluate feasibility goals and gather meaningful data on user experience [27].”
Decker, S. R. D. R., Pereira, D. D. A., Rech, G. S., dos Santos, R. D. R. M., de Souza, D., de Carli, R. F., Trott, G., de Souza, A. P., Gonzaga, J., Costa, L. S. S., et al. (2025) · Critical Care Explorations · doi:10.1097/cce.0000000000001279 · Cited by 1
Berk, J., Cook, M., Martin, M. S., Lee, J. D., Koinis‐Mitchell, D., Brinkley‐Rubinstein, L., Drainoni, M., & Rich, J. D. (2025) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2025.108004 · Cited by 1
Schröter, M., Koch, A. K., Berschick, J., Schiele, J. K., Bogdanski, M., Steinmetz, M., Czakert, J., Stritter, W., Keßler, C. S., & Seifert, G. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-12543-0 · Cited by 2
Leung, L. B., Brayton, C. E., Hovsepian, S., Karakashian, M. A., Chu, K., JACKSON, N. J., Shekelle, P., Hamilton, A. B., Yano, E. M., Rollman, B. L., et al. (2025) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2025.07.014 · Cited by 1
“We are limited to drawing only preliminary conclusions regarding the health effects of cCBT-CC, because the pilot’s small sample limit our confidence in the effect size estimates [41,42].”
Pearl, R. L., Saunders, D., Groshon, L. C., Li, Y., Shonrock, A. T., Puhl, R. M., Driscoll, K. A., Manavalan, P., Gelfand, J. M., Wadden, T. A., et al. (2025) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/69548 · Cited by 2
“Other metrics of feasibility included achieving participant retention of at least 80% and an average session attendance rate of at least 70% (calculated by averaging the total number of sessions attended by participants, both inclusive and exclusive of makeup sessions) [36,37].”
Charalampopoulou, Μ., Ibrahim, A. T., Prime, H., Eddy, N., Panetta, L., Brown, H. M., Desai, S., Gray, K. M., Lai, M., Langdon, P. E., et al. (2025) · Autism · doi:10.1177/13623613251359196 · Cited by 2
“Provided the heterogeneity of an autistic sample, a priori criteria were not used in a pass/fail way, but as a way to understand our findings in the context of other feasibility studies (Teresi et al., 2022).”
Alexander, E. C., Zahari, N., Ezra, D., Tran, S., Kumar, M., Rosen, S., Bycroft, T., Mitting, R. B., & Ramnarayan, P. (2025) · Intensive Care Medicine – Paediatric and Neonatal · doi:10.1007/s44253-025-00080-7 · Cited by 1
“However, other than time to perform each scan (and ability to involve the multidisciplinary team), we did not use any formal measures to assess feasibility (such as ease of the POCUS method in enabling recruitment, retention, intervention fidelity, acceptability, adherence, and engagement [20]).”
KRISHNAMURTHY, V., Ilangovan, K., Viswanathan, V., Suresh, S., Chandrasekar, R., Chandramohan, R., Padmanabhan, B., Manjunathaswamy, A., Padmanabhan, R., Subramaniam, S., et al. (2025) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127644 · Cited by 1
Safety and feasibility trial protocol of metformin in infants after perinatal brain injury
Hutchinson, A.-M., Pais, R., Endginton, A. N., Pilon, B., MacDonald, J. M., MacDonald, M. E., Lewis, T. R., Offringa, M., & Kalish, B. T. (2025) · BMJ Paediatrics Open · doi:10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002784 · Cited by 1
Kato, D., Hirano, S., Imoto, D., Ii, T., Matsuura, D., Ishihara, T., & Otaka, Y. (2025) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-025-01694-6 · Cited by 1
“…this study to determine the sample size for a future definitive trial, we intend to use estimates of variability and feasibility indi-cators—including recruitment, adherence, and retention rates—as well as the minimally important difference, if identifiable, to inform future trial designs [44].”
Interprofessional, risk-adapted medication management in older patients with cancer (IrMa)
Thevissen, J., Schmitz, M., Schmid, M. C., Ko, Y., Jacobs, A. H., & Jaehde, U. (2025) · Journal of Geriatric Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102359 · Cited by 1
Christiansen, M. G., Pappot, H., Jarden, M., Tolver, A., Mikkelsen, H. S., Mirza, M. R., & Piil, K. (2025) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-025-09875-y · Cited by 1
“Feasibility was evaluated based on general and study-specific parameters [19, 20]: including safety (timely management of moderate or severe symptoms, nurses consulting a physician in case of doubt, and ensuring patient data protection), acceptability (adherence, recruitment, conduction of…”
Wright, F. V., Ryan, J. L., & Hung, R. (2025) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2025.2543176 · Cited by 1
Croff, R. L., Kaluna, L., Kim, B., Becker, M., Belza, B. L., Abdi, N., Otewa, M., Lagat, H., Cryer, A., Winston, K., et al. (2025) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnaf213 · Cited by 1
Pharmacist-assessed medication adherence and quality of life in patients with epilepsy
Petrides, M., Peletidi, A., Polyzois, S., Nena, E., Constantinidis, T. C., & Kontogiorgis, C. A. (2025) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/20523211.2025.2557872 · Cited by 1
“For quantitative studies, a sample of 30 participants per group (intervention and control) is often considered adequate to estimate parameters and assess feasibility before scaling up (Teresi et al., 2022).”
Juez-Garcia, I., Benitez, I. D., Torres, G., González, J., Utrillo, L., Pérez, A., Varvará, N., Cuadrat, I., Barbé, F., & de Batlle, J. (2025) · Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13049-025-01458-4 · Cited by 1
“More-over, we ensured that the resulting sample would suffice according to feasibility study guidelines [31].”
Park, J., Montero-Hernandez, S. A., Huff, A. J., Lee, C., Pollonini, L., Park, L., Lin, L., Telkes, I., Galvin, J. E., Hoang, J., et al. (2025) · British Journal of Pain · doi:10.1177/20494637251384009 · Cited by 1
Milliron, B., Mountain, P., Salman, K., Longo, G., Schlechter, H., Deutsch, J. M., & Jubelirer, T. F. (2025) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-025-01703-8 · Cited by 1
Reid, C., Young, J., Smyth, D., Searby, A., Fenech, M., Hynes, S., Merollini, K. M. D., & Knowles, J. (2025) · Drug and Alcohol Review · doi:10.1111/dar.70050 · Cited by 1
Sánchez-Gavilán, I., Li, S., Sweet, M. G., Ratliff, J. G., Rist, P. M., Kim, E., Manson, J. E., Sesso, H. D., & Neilson, A. P. (2025) · Food & Function · doi:10.1039/d5fo02596f · Cited by 1
Boarini, M., Banchelli, F., Fittipaldi, S., Scognamiglio, D., Farella, G. M. G., Platano, D., Rogati, G., Sipio, E. D., Villa, G., Berti, L., et al. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-22231-8 · Cited by 1
“Five core parameters were assessed: recruitment, retention, compliance, adherence, and acceptability, with thresholds based on existing literature 27,32 .”
Linhares, S. M., D’Aquila, M., Schultz, K. S., & Mongiu, A. K. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0329883 · Cited by 1
Richardson, C., Chan, C., Macgregor, E., Hare, C., Hannon, B. L., Black, S., Schneider, E., Buchman, D. Z., Wang, S., Rac, V. E., et al. (2025) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-025-01706-5 · Cited by 1
“Qualitative feasibility studies are growing in number, and there are clearer guidelines around conducting qualitative research of this type [36, 56].”
Young, S. D., & Hanley, A. W. (2025) · European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education · doi:10.3390/ejihpe15120239 · Cited by 1
Pigmans, R. R. W. P., Goto, L., Wientjes, R., Markhorst, D. G., van Woensel, J. B. M., Gaytant, M. A., Huysmans, T., Dijkman, C. D., & Reinout, A. (2025) · 3D Printing in Medicine · doi:10.1186/s41205-025-00311-9 · Cited by 1
“We aimed for a sample size of 30–34 subjects for this feasibility study, based on the guidelines for designing and evaluating feasibility pilot studies [20].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Teresi, J. A., Yu, X., Stewart, A. L., & Hays, R. D.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew Home (US)
- The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Teresi, Jeanne A.
- ORCID
- Hays, Ron D.
- Venue
- Medical Care
- Published
- 2021-11-23
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 95-103
- ISSN
- 0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8849521
- OpenAlex
- W3215891836
- Cited by
- 734
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 280 · 2025: 279 · 2024: 141 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 7
- FWCI
- 32.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Medical Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (2p30ag028741-16)
- University of California, San Francisco
- National Institute on Aging (P30‐AG028741, P30AG059303, P30AG059301, P30AG021684, P30AG015272, P30AG022845)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K12HD052023)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Keywords
- effect size estimation, sample size determination, randomized controlled trials, recruitment and retention, intervention fidelity, treatment acceptability, adherence, participant engagement, intervention adaptation, minimally important difference, confidence intervals, nonparametric statistics, design effect
- MeSH terms
- Feasibility Studies, Humans, Pilot Projects, Research Design, Guidelines as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review