The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guidelines for Designing and Evaluating Feasibility Pilot Studies
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Pilot studies test the feasibility of methods and procedures to be used in larger-scale studies. Although numerous articles describe guidelines for the conduct of pilot studies, few have included specific feasibility indicators or strategies for evaluating multiple aspects of feasibility. In addition, using pilot studies to estimate effect sizes to plan sample sizes for subsequent randomized controlled trials has been challenged; however, there has been little consensus on alternative strategies. METHODS: In Section 1, specific indicators (recruitment, retention, intervention fidelity, acceptability, adherence, and engagement) are presented for feasibility assessment of data collection methods and intervention implementation. Section 1 also highlights the importance of examining feasibility when adapting an intervention tested in mainstream populations to a new more diverse group. In Section 2, statistical and design issues are presented, including sample sizes for pilot studies, estimates of minimally important differences, design effects, confidence intervals (CI) and nonparametric statistics. An in-depth treatment of the limits of effect size estimation as well as process variables is presented. Tables showing CI around parameters are provided. With small samples, effect size, completion and adherence rate estimates will have large CI. CONCLUSION: This commentary offers examples of indicators for evaluating feasibility, and of the limits of effect size estimation in pilot studies. As demonstrated, most pilot studies should not be used to estimate effect sizes, provide power calculations for statistical tests or perform exploratory analyses of efficacy. It is hoped that these guidelines will be useful to those planning pilot/feasibility studies before a larger-scale study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, the sample size of the present study falls within the range recommended for pilot studies (Lancaster et al., 2004; Teresi et al., 2022).”
From Evaluation of effectiveness and acceptability of a psychological treatment for smoking cessation combined with a smartphone App: A pilot study (2024) · cites this paper as Teresi et al., 2022
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The study aimed to recruit 80 participants to allow a 25% attrition rate and a final sample of 40 participants, appropriate for pilot feasibility studies (Creswell & Creswell, 2022; Teresi et al., 2022).”
From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Tele-Counselling Program With Care Partners of Persons Living With Dementia: A Pilot Feasibility RCT. (2026) · cites this paper as Teresi et al., 2022
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How we design feasibility studies
Bowen, D. J., Kreuter, M., Spring, B., Cofta-Woerpel, L., Linnan, L., Weiner, D., Bakken, S., Kaplan, C. P., Squiers, L., Fabrizio, C., et al. (2009) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002 · Cited by 4,021
Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., Ader, D., Fries, J. F., Bruce, B., & Rose, M. (2007) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55 · Cited by 3,118
Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study
Julious, S. A. (2005) · Pharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1002/pst.185 · Cited by 3,068
CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials
on behalf of the PAFS consensus group, Eldridge, S. M., Chan, C. L., Campbell, M. J., Bond, C. M., Hopewell, S., Thabane, L., & Lancaster, G. A. (2016) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-016-0105-8 · Cited by 2,843 · cited 1×
“Feasibility indicators can include completion rates and times for speci fi c components, perceived burden, incon-venience, and reasons for noncompletion, 9 all of which may inform assessment protocol modi fi cation.”
BackgroundBellg, A. J., Treatment Fidelity Workgroup of the NIH Behavior Change Consortium, Borrelli, B., Resnick, B., Hecht, J., Minicucci, D. S., Ory, M., Ogedegbe, G., Orwig, D., Ernst, D., et al. (2004) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.23.5.443 · Cited by 2,620
Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice
Lancaster, G. A., Dodd, S., & Williamson, P. R. (2004) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/j..2002.384.doc.x · Cited by 2,572
Revicki, D. A., Hays, R. D., Cella, D. F., & Sloan, J. A. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012 · Cited by 2,384
Whitehead, A. L., Julious, S. A., Cooper, C. L., & Campbell, M. J. (2016) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0962280215588241 · Cited by 1,936
The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research
Leon, A. C., Davis, L. L., & Kraemer, H. C. (2011) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.10.008 · Cited by 1,917
Eldridge, S. M., Lancaster, G. A., Campbell, M. J., Thabane, L., Hopewell, S., Coleman, C. L., & Bond, C. M. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150205 · Cited by 1,581
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Jones, 2016, Differential item functioning in Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) physical functioning short forms, Psychol Test Assess Model, 58, 371
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 733
Koon, L. M., Donnelly, J. E., Washburn, R. A., Sherman, J. R., Kroeger, M. M., Romine, R. S., Handlery, R., & Handlery, K. (2025) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-025-01725-2 · Cited by 1
“Compensation was provided to offset time and transportation costs, which is common practice in feasibility studies to support retention and reduce participant burden [37].”
InfluentialDisparities in Family-Centered Rounds Participation by Caregiver’s Preferred Language
Kurtz, J. B., Simmons, P., Jones, J. M., Nguyen, J., Ellis, M., Chang, F., Hoehn, B., Dickens, H., Rimes, S., Roman, M., et al. (2025) · Hospital Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/hpeds.2025-008329 · Cited by 1
Kim, J., Kim, H. Y. S., & Kim, K. (2025) · Veterinary Medicine International · doi:10.1155/vmi/9925114 · Cited by 1
Zhao, X., Lan, Y., Li, Y., Xu, Y., & Wan, Q. (2025) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.70180 · Cited by 1
“Previous methodological guidelines and studies have consistently emphasized that pilot studies are a necessary first step to assess the feasibility of methods and procedures to be used in a larger RCT study [29–31].”
Norris, M. L., Power, K. A., Spettigue, W. J., Lavallée, N., Gertler, M. J., Livingston, D. B. H., Rodrigue, A. F., Porter, J., Pope, L., Harrison, M. E., et al. (2025) · Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1186/s40337-025-01490-w · Cited by 1
“Study feasibility was assessed using established feasibility guidelines for design and evaluation [6, 34, 43], which were adapted to address considerations specific to the adolescent ED population under investigation.”
Tinney, E. M., Nwakamma, M. C., España‐Irla, G., Kong, L. L., Chen, C., Hwang, J., O’Brien, A. M., Perko, M. L., Sodemann, R. L., Caefer, J., et al. (2026) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/htr.0000000000001188 · Cited by 1
Liao, S., Huang, J., Peng, Z., Hou, Y., Su, G., Li, Y., Wen, Z., & Lin, D. (2025) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1695623 · Cited by 1
“It was carefully designed, not only with adequate randomization, allocation concealment, and blinding of outcome assessors and statisticians, but also specifying clear feasibility objectives, analytic plans, and criteria for the success of feasibility (80).”
Keleman, A., Bounds, M., Mundo, W., Gomez-Picazo, J., Mealer, M., Linnebur, S. A., Ferozan, B., Dunn, J., Stevens-Lapsley, J., & Goldberg, E. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1720938 · Cited by 1
Beneciuk, J. M., Bialosky, J. E., Harrison, T., Buzzanca-Fried, K. E., Rodgers, L. J., & Verstandig, D. (2025) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/pzaf152 · Cited by 2
Chew, K. A., Cazanis, A., Hymus, S., Grant, S., Ponsford, J. L., & Gould, K. R. (2026) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2025.2605172 · Cited by 1
Townsend, L. D., Gee, N. R., Friedmann, E., Mueller, M. K., Thakre, T. P., & Barker, S. (2026) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare14020154 · Cited by 1
Mendoza-Contreras, L. A., Guillén-Núñez, M. D. R., Medina, D. A. R., Romo, J. F. M., Vazquez, O., & Trejo, B. D. (2026) · Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings · doi:10.1007/s10880-025-10120-1 · Cited by 1
“Finally, as this is a single-group pilot feasibility study, the findings should be interpreted as preliminary and descriptive, focusing on feasibility rates and reported acceptability (Teresi et al., 2022).”
Harnessing Learner Content and User Interface Design for Basic Education
Yeboah, A. N., & Goosen, L. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-2913-0.ch001 · Cited by 1
Tschenett, H., Dreisoerner, A., Schäfer, K., Mewes, R., & Nater, U. M. (2026) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2025.100901 · Cited by 1
“For the interpretation of the main research question of feasibility, however, the sample size is sufficient (Teresi et al., 2022).”
Helms, C. E., Krukowski, R. A., Weeldreyer, N. R., Glick, J., Ellison, C., Mabalot, M. B., Day, K. R., Millard, T. A., Dillon, P. M., Brenin, C. M., et al. (2026) · Translational Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1249/tjx.0000000000000342 · Cited by 1
Koon, L. M., Donnelly, J. E., Sosnoff, J. J., Tabatabaei, A., Sherman, J. R., Rice, A., Means, M., Handlery, R., & Handlery, K. (2026) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare14030349 · Cited by 1
“Feasibility outcomes were evaluated against established pilot feasibility thresholds (e.g., ≥ 70% recruitment, ≥ 80% retention, and ≥ 75% attendance) [36,37].”
Murray, G. E., Bernier, L., Kratzer, M. P. L., & Palfai, T. P. (2026) · Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings · doi:10.1007/s10880-026-10129-0 · Cited by 1
Cortés, Y. I., Harris, L. K., Cazales, A., Mărginean, V., Long, C., Woods‐Giscombé, C. L., & Perreira, K. M. (2026) · Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society · doi:10.1097/gme.0000000000002718 · Cited by 2
Use of Parent- and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Pediatric Specialty Clinics
Jones, R. K., Devlin, N. J., McLean, K., Roberts, G., Berry, A., Shanthikumar, S., Trajanovska, M., King, S. K., Hiscock, H., & Dalziel, K. (2026) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.58973 · Cited by 1
Khan, A., Madihie, A., Haider, M., Haider, S., Khan, R., & Bahadar, A. (2026) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-026-09543-4 · Cited by 1
“The phase two consists of a quantitative pilot feasibility study by using a single-group pre-and post-test design [55] to assess feasibility, acceptability, safety, and preliminary symptom change following delivery of the adapted intervention.”
Virtual Reality–Based Avatar Intervention for Eating Disorders: Mixed Methods Feasibility Study
Hansen, N. S., Ries, E. S., Rasmussen, K., Cardi, V., Christensen, A. B., Hjorthøj, C. R., Micali, N., Ward, T., & Glenthøj, L. B. (2026) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/88445 · Cited by 1
“Semistructured interviews were conducted to explore participants’ experiences regarding barriers and facilitators to engagement, with the aim of informing intervention acceptability and refinement [31,47].”
Xia, L., Ma, Z., Chen, S., Liu, S., Yan, B., Min, J., Yang, Z., Wang, W. H., Liu, Q., Xia, Y., et al. (2026) · Nutrition Journal · doi:10.1186/s12937-026-01296-9 · Cited by 1
“This sample size falls within the commonly recommended range of 10 to 35 participants per arm for pilot studies [26, 27], providing a sufficient basis.”
Inclusion by design: A mixed‐methods feasibility study on backward design for inclusive education
Porta, T., & Nawas, A. (2026) · Review of Education · doi:10.1002/rev3.70143 · Cited by 1
McAlpine, R. G., Jaglinska, M., Jedlovszky, K., Kuc, J., Castro, A., Piot, A., Timmermann, C., Skipper, J. I., Sacchet, M. D., & Kamboj, S. K. (2026) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107512 · Cited by 1
McAnulty, C., Lavoie, P., Cyr, S., Lavín, P., Elkrief, L., Richard‐Devantoy, S., Rizkallah, É., Lespérance, P., Gamin, N., Lembke, A., et al. (2026) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116969 · Cited by 2
Santos, G. D. S., Soares, A. N., SOARES, G. M. P., de Lima, T. A. M., Fernandes, J., Duarte, Â. L. B. P., Tenório, A. D. S., & Dantas, A. T. (2026) · Musculoskeletal Care · doi:10.1002/msc.70217 · Cited by 1
Almarjawi, A., Furzer, B. J., Mulders, W. H. A. M., Edwards, G., Tarawneh, H. Y., Linton, N., Austin, F., Wright, K. E., Jackson, B. S., Brennan‐Jones, C. G., et al. (2026) · Speech Language and Hearing · doi:10.1080/2050571x.2026.2652120 · Cited by 1
Russo, L., Proto, L., Farina, S., Pascucci, E., Galarducci, R., Pasciuto, T., Severino, A., Liuzzo, G., Innecco Urbani, A., Iavicoli, I., et al. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0345294 · Cited by 1
A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Mindful Attention Training Workshop for Firefighters
Lebeaut, A., Zegel, M., Buser, S. J., & Vujanovic, A. A. (2026) · Occupational Health · doi:10.3390/occuphealth1020017 · Cited by 1
“Aligned with pilot trial guidelines [54,55] and given the study’s primary focus on feasibility and acceptability rather than intervention efficacy, formal power analyses were not conducted.”
Tang, Y., Gierc, M. S. H., Liu, S., Lam, R. W. M., Puterman, E. M., & Faulkner, G. (2026) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/79033 · Cited by 1
“According to the study protocol, orientation session recordings were to be transcribed immediately and assessed by a research assistant using a fidelity checklist to enable timely modifications for improving treatment fidelity after each session [36].”
Buberwa, E. (2026) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2026.2665556 · Cited by 1
Ostgathe, C., Bausewein, C., Schildmann, E. K., Heckel, M., Kauzner, S., Klein, C., Kolmhuber-Seibold, S., Krauss, S. H., Kremling, A., Odierna, B., et al. (2026) · BMC Palliative Care · doi:10.1186/s12904-026-02112-1 · Cited by 1
“The same applies to strategies for evaluating feasibility studies [31, 32].”
The Role of Pilot Studies When Planning Clinical Trials in Nephrology
Harel, Z., Prce, I., Walsh, M., & Wald, R. (2026) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.0000001146 · Cited by 1
Sinha, P., Chatterjee, P., Kathiresan, P., Raju, K. S., Panwar, R., Mukherjee, A., Kumar, G., Cherian, J. J., Velayuthan, A., Chakrawarty, A., et al. (2026) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.70530 · Cited by 2
“As is standard in exploratory research, no formal power calculation was performed [33].”
Seierstad, A., Schjøtt-Pedersen, O., Berentzen, L., Bull, H. C., Freeman, D. H., Gardsjord, E. S., Gjerstad, C. L., Lambe, S., Røssberg, J. I., & Lystad, J. U. (2026) · Nordic Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/08039488.2026.2693804 · Cited by 1
“The target sample size of 30 participants was based on recommendations for feasibility studies [27–29] and a pragmatic approach to the assessment of feasibility in the context of available study resources.”
Cognitive-behavioral therapy for post COVID-19 condition: A pilot randomized controlled trial
Sauer, K. S., Bräscher, A., Germer, S., Huth, D., Kolb, J., Mütze, K., & Witthöft, M. (2026) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2026.112920 · Cited by 1
Community-engaged and Implementation Science-informed Pediatric Sleep Intervention Research
Williamson, A. A., & Levenson, J. C. (2026) · Current Sleep Medicine Reports · doi:10.1007/s40675-026-00389-5 · Cited by 1
“Most evaluations with implementation outcomes focused on acceptability, feasibility, and fidelity, which overlap with recommended pilot trial outcomes [ 76, 77].”
Βiskanaki, F., Varvaresou, A., Papageorgiou, E. G., Protopapa, E., & Lazaris, A. C. (2026) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app16147050 · Cited by 1
Valentine Joseph Owan, P. D., Abang, K. B., Beshel, C. A., & Undie, R. A. (2023) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-3132-3.ch015 · Cited by 1
„Ef við náum ekki bekkjarstjórn þá getum við gleymt þessu“
Ólafsdóttir, S. B., Guðmundsdóttir, B. G., & Sigmarsdóttir, M. (2024) · Netla · doi:10.24270/netla.2024/2
Unfolding e-learning services affecting factors from gender perspectives
Jovanka, D. R., Rasyono, R., Sofwan, M., Azhra, S. Y., & Habibi, A. (2024) · Edutec Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa · doi:10.21556/edutec.2024.88.3099 · Cited by 1
Beuthin, O., Shahid, S., Yu, L., & Bhui, K. S. (2024) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/56957 · Cited by 1
“The National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health notes that sample sizes should be based on practical considerations, including participant flow, financial constraints, and the number of participants needed to evaluate feasibility goals [44].”
BackgroundBouassa, R. M., Needham, J., Nohynek, D., Samarani, S., Bobeuf, F., Balso, L. D., Paisible, N., Vertzagias, C., Sebastiani, G., Margolese, S. L., et al. (2024) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm14070745 · Cited by 1
“Similarly, retention rate may be defined as enrolled participants with valid primary outcome data or the proportion of enrolled participants who are present throughout the length of the study until the final study visit [44,47,48,56].”
BackgroundSouza, G. R., Turner, K. L., Gullapalli, K., Paravathaneni, M., Ionescu, F., Semaan, A., DeJesus, A. B., Trujillo, G., Le, C., Kim, Y., et al. (2024) · JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics · doi:10.1200/cci.24.00044 · Cited by 1
“The determination of the study ’ s sample size was guided by guidelines from the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health 23 and the landmark study from Birkett and Day, 37 with the selection process in fl uenced by pragmatic factors such as anticipated participant recruitment rates,…”
Predicting Epileptic Seizures Using Biometric Sensors – A Pilot Study Protocol
Norbye, A. D., Henriksen, A., Hartvigsen, G., & Farbu, E. H. (2024) · Studies in health technology and informatics · doi:10.3233/shti240464 · Cited by 1
Kalu, M. E., Chaston, A., Alizadehsaravi, N., Véras, M. M. S., & McArthur, C. (2024) · Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences · doi:10.3389/fresc.2024.1455384 · Cited by 1
Kowalski, L., Finnes, A., Koch, S., Stenling, A., & Bujacz, A. (2024) · BMC Digital Health · doi:10.1186/s44247-024-00120-w · Cited by 1
“Pilot testing the intervention and study procedures at an early stage is critical to identify potential pitfalls that need to be addressed before conducting a full-scale trial [18, 19].”
BackgroundEstudio piloto: viabilidad de la formación en línea en bioneuroemoción para docentes
Rivera‐Medina, C. L., Corbera, D., Inda, A., Ohaco, E. H., Sastre, E. C., & Pallarès, S. (2024) · Educación y Educadores · doi:10.5294/edu.2023.26.3.5 · Cited by 1
Strekalova, Y. A., Jain, S. R., & Sarder, P. (2025) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087739 · Cited by 1
Chung, J. O. K., Li, W. H. C., Leung, Y.-P. D., Cheung, T. C. K., Chiu, S. Y., Pong, M. S. Y., & Chan, G. C. F. (2025) · European Journal of Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2025.102851 · Cited by 1
Sibley, A. L., Muessig, K. E., Noar, S. M., Gottfredson, N. C., Miller, W. C., & Go, V. F.-L. (2025) · Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.josat.2025.209671 · Cited by 1
Marchewka, R., Trzmiel, T., & Hojan, K. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15063182 · Cited by 1
“Instead, descriptive statistics were provided, including changes between measurements at different study stages, with means and standard deviations calculated for quantitative variables and medians and ranges presented for ordinal variables [18].”
InfluentialGlover, N. A., Sathar, F., Mokome, P., Mathabela, N., Taleni, S., van Blydenstein, S. A., Mekota, A., Charalambous, S., Rachow, A., & Ivanova, O. (2025) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/58436 · Cited by 1
“Our target sample size was 60, which was informed by evidence that sample sizes of 24 ‐ 50 are sufficient to estimate the key parameters of an efficacy and feasibility trial [30].”
Suhs, M. C., O’Donnell, A. J., Ellis, J., Weissberg-Benchell, J. A., Harris, M. A., & Papadakis, J. L. (2025) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsaf023 · Cited by 1
Dariotis, J. K., Eldreth, D. A., Jackson‐Gordon, R., Li, H., Wang, K.-N., Xi, C., Lewis, G. F., & Shirtcliff, E. A. (2025) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/75731 · Cited by 2
“This is consistent with recommendations by Teresi et al [32].”
Chaplin, A. M. L., Wordsworth, J., Prohens, L., Obrador‐Hevia, A., Morales, M. G., Ricci‐Cabello, I., Sesé, A., & Romaguera, D. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0323671 · Cited by 2
“The aim of the Pilot Feasibility Study is to contribute to the growing body of knowledge regarding the impact of a lifestyle intervention in PLWBC and obtain feasibility indicators [47] for its implementation in our local clinical setting.”
Narendorf, S. C., Munson, M. R., Khan, U., Brown, M., Gomez, G., Maria, D. S., Gilmer, T., Gattis, M. N., Hayward, P., & Herman, D. B. (2025) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-025-01677-7 · Cited by 2
Tuncer, G. Z., & Duman, Z. Ç. (2025) · Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services · doi:10.3928/02793695-20250707-04 · Cited by 1
Srinivasan, S. M., Kataria, K., Yorns, W. R., Moore, T. E., Yoo, C., Kumavor, P. D., Morgan, K. D., & Friel, K. M. (2025) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/17483107.2025.2534436 · Cited by 2
“…to evaluate feasibility outcomes [23,24]. therefore, our pilot RCt is powered to assess feasibility criteria (adherence, retention, and satisfaction) rather than being powered to detect statistically significant differences between groups, which is problematic with small sample sizes [23,25,26].”
Brown, J. M., Rita, N., Franco‐Arellano, B., LeSage, A., & Arcand, J. (2024) · doi:10.2196/preprints.69242 · Cited by 1
Ganesan, V., Fowler, L. A., Bajaj, S., Qu, H., Singh, P., Krishnan, S. D., McGregor, K., Nolan, T. S., Baidwan, N. K., Mehta, T. S., et al. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.01.04.25319992 · Cited by 2
Anekadhana, N. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7382567/v1 · Cited by 1
Pilot Study: Dipping your Toe into the Water
Maurya, I., & Lohiya, A. (2023) · Indian Journal of Pain · doi:10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_15_23
Verde, E., Oliveira, S., Cruz‐Santos, A., & Lima, E. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14040407
Muyambi, K., Walsh, S., Dettwiller, P. Y., Tan, K. L., Dennis, S., Bressington, D. T., Gray, R. J., McCall, A., & Jones, M. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080245
“29 30 If our trial demonstrates the feasibility and acceptability of behavioural activation as a treatment for negative symptoms in adults with schizophrenia, it will deliver benefits including (a) informing the design of a full-scale randomised controlled trial and (b) updating the extant evidence…”
MethodHebda-Boon, A., Shortland, A. P., Birn‐Jeffery, A. V., & Morrissey, D. (2024) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-024-01477-5
“In line with accepted practice for feasibility studies, no power analysis will be conducted, and all analyses will be exploratory only [29].”
BackgroundWalsh, S., Muyambi, K., Dennis, S., Hutchinson, S., Turnbull, T., Tan, K. L., Dettwiller, P. Y., Bressington, D. T., Gray, R. J., Howard, L., et al. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0304767 · Cited by 1
“Feasibility trials are important for determining whether aspects of a study will work and to estimate the parameters, such as sample size and potential attrition rates, for a larger trial should one be conducted [17].”
BackgroundBudge, S. L., Tebbe, E. A., Lee, J., Dominguez, S., Matsuno, E. G., & Lindley, L. M. (2024) · doi:10.2196/preprints.64477
Eik‐Nes, T. T., Fiskum, C., Vrabel, K. R., & Berg, K. H. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4734284/v1
Home-Based Shi’s Knee Daoyin Exercise for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial
Xu, K., Zhang, J., Ma, W., Wang, Y., Chen, B., Gao, N., Pang, J., & Zhan, H. (2024) · Journal of Pain Research · doi:10.2147/jpr.s469176
“34 Thus, based on the consensus opinion of experts including statisticians, public health specialists and clinicians, it was agreed that a sample of 72 would be adequate to inform feasibility for a fully powered randomized controlled trial and gather preliminary outcome data.”
BackgroundLai, B. W., Wright, A., Hutchinson, B., Bright, L., Young, R., Davis, D., Malik, S. A., Rimmer, J. H., & Pelham High Community Engagement Group (2024) · doi:10.2196/preprints.65801
Liverpool, S., Fletcher, K., Chopra, T. K., Jay, D., Walters, F., & Kaye, L. K. (2024) · Mental Health and Digital Technologies · doi:10.1108/mhdt-07-2024-0015 · Cited by 1
Decision Style Inventory Application in Parent/Guardian Vaccination Decision-Making: A Pilot Study
Arthur, L., & Snyder, A. E. (2024) · Journal of Pediatric Health Care · doi:10.1016/j.pedhc.2024.07.009
Medford, E., Lane, S., Merriel, A., Sharp, A., & Care, A. (2024) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.09.19.24314025
Using the Design Thinking Approach for a University Health Promotion Program: A Pilot Study
Alber, J. M., Askay, D. A., Nelson, C., & Ramirez-Crippen, J. (2024) · Health Promotion Practice · doi:10.1177/15248399241294233
“These studies involve field-testing or examining the implementation process, including logistical aspects of a larger study, including methods, design, and participant recruitment, to ensure the viability of proceeding further (Teresi et al., 2022).”
McDonough, S., Stephenson, A., Grimmett, C., Bennett, K., Coyle, N., Grealis, S., Kinneavy, C., FitzGerald, O., French, H., Stokes, M. J., et al. (2024) · HRB Open Research · doi:10.12688/hrbopenres.14002.1
Asociación de psoriasis con glositis migratoria benigna y lengua fisurada en adultos chilenos
Briceño, J., Corona, N., Valenzuela, F., Jiménez, C., Fernández, A., V, & Fernández, J. (2024) · Piel · doi:10.1016/j.piel.2024.07.004
Yamin, J. B., Pester, B., Kommu, R., Allen, C., Dharmendran, D., Steinhilber, K., Crago, M. A., Kazemipour, S., Franqueiro, A. R., Fentazi, D., et al. (2024) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2024.107785
Hashimoto, T., Putman, R. K., Massaro, A. F., Shiozawa, Y., McGough, K., McCabe, K. K., Linden, J. A., Wang, W., Liu, S. W., Kennedy, M., et al. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0313858
Braun, A. C., Corcoran, S., Doan, K. T., Jernigan, C., Moriasi, C. M., Businelle, M. S., & Bui, T. C. (2024) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/64010
“Around 60 participants are selected as consistent with recommendations for pilot studies, taking into consideration the focus on evaluating feasibility, as well as practical restraints [30].”
Bankanie, V. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-5633373/v1
Thompson, B. A. D., Gilmore, R., Hilton, N., Barfoot, J., Moody, C. T., Whittingham, K., Keramat, S. A., Boyd, R. N., & Sakzewski, L. (2025) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095354
Foley, J. D., Davis, M., Schiavo, S., Bernier, L., Mukerji, S. S., & Batchelder, A. (2025) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-025-04647-5
“Given that only 15 people were randomized to the intervention and only 11 were considered “completers”, this pilot study had a relatively small sample size [ 67 ].”
Tam, C. C., Young, S. D., Harrison, S. E., Li, X., & Litwin, A. H. (2025) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/65847
“According to the guidance for pilot intervention studies [110], it is suggested a minimum sample of 30 per group for the feasibility evaluation.”
Implementing an Online Instrument to Measure Nurse Practitioner Workload: A Feasibility Study
Kilpatrick, K., Landry, V., Nguemeleu, E. T., Daigle, A., & Jabbour, M. (2025) · Journal of Primary Care & Community Health · doi:10.1177/21501319251321302
“25,26 A participatory research approach guided the process and the implementation plan was adapted with participants.”
Implementing an Educational Model for Cardiac Arrest Patients During Interfacility Transfers
Burla, M. J., York, D. R., Wishengrad, J., Michalakes, P. C., Stevens, H. A., & May, T. (2025) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.79892
“To assess feasibility, a target participation rate of 70% was set, accounting for variations in staff availability [14].”
Sousa, H., Ribeiro, Ó. M., Bártolo, A., Rodrigues, M., Costa, E. M., Quental, J., Ribeiro, F., Paúl, C., & de Figueiredo, D. M. P. (2025) · Journal of Renal Care · doi:10.1111/jorc.70012 · Cited by 1
Feasibility of Licensed Vocational Nurses Using a CDS App to Communicate Signs and Symptoms of a UTI
Ashcraft, A. S., Owen, D. C., Johnson, K., & Song, H. (2025) · Nursing Research and Practice · doi:10.1155/nrp/8574727
“A minimum sample size of 10 was desired to ensure ability to evaluate the feasibility goals [18].”
Kaptan, S. K., Habtamu, M., Getahun, S., Tadesse, B., Akan, A., Pupat, A., Bizouerne, C., & Husain, N. (2025) · Journal of Tropical Medicine · doi:10.1155/jotm/1307578
Cherry, J., Nelson, A. M., Robinson, L. A., Goldstein, J., Vives‐Rodriguez, A., Sharp, E. S., & Tinaz, S. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.03.14.25324001
Balter, A.-S., Moloney, M., Ma, C., Lee, A., Pierre, S., Parkes, S., Pulat, D., Racine, N. M., & Andrade, B. F. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0319398 · Cited by 2
“…have chosen to assess feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness are informed by the CFIR framework [30], the effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial design typology [38], as well as guidelines to inform the design of pilot and feasibility studies [39–41] and SEL program implementation [33].”
Kaur, K., & Khan, M. (2025) · Open Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.4236/jss.2025.133025
Prieto‐Moreno, R., Mora‐Traverso, M., Moreno-Ramírez, M. P., Ayuso, D. M. R., Martín‐Martín, L., & Ariza‐Vega, P. (2025) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-025-06963-9
“Guidelines for conducting feasibility studies recommend to include variables such as acceptance, adoption or dropout rates as key markers for successful implementation [32–34].”
Medical-Dental Integration: Oral Health (OH-I-CAN®) Program
Bussenius, H. H., Moore, C. E., Kombara, G. G., Endeshaw, Y. W., Hendler, K., & Yang, I. H. (2025) · The Journal for Nurse Practitioners · doi:10.1016/j.nurpra.2025.105361
Veerakumar, L., & Vetrivelan, S. (2025) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108288
Swallow, V. M., Horsman, J. M., Mazlan, E., Campbell, F., Zaid, R., Julian, M., Branchflower, J., Martin-Kerry, J., Monks, H., Soni, A., et al. (2025) · doi:10.2196/preprints.74032
Hitching, R., Kluge, M. G., Walker, F. R., Gordon, C. J., & Lampe, L. A. (2025) · doi:10.2196/preprints.77094
Shi, Y., Guo, Y., Dai, J., Lu, J.-L., Huang, S., & Lu, X. (2025) · Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP · doi:10.1590/1980-220x-reeusp-2024-0181es
CEDART study: protocol for a non-randomized feasibility study
Kwak, J., Jafari, A., Salter, A., Perry, A., Shepherd, A. D. M., Jayasundera, M., Stayer, S., Brode, M., Patel, S. G., & Kvale, E. A. (2026) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-026-01909-4
Metadata
- Authors
- Teresi, J. A., Yu, X., Stewart, A. L., & Hays, R. D.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew Home (US)
- The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Teresi, Jeanne A.
- ORCID
- Hays, Ron D.
- Venue
- Medical Care
- Published
- 2021-11-23
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 95-103
- ISSN
- 0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8849521
- OpenAlex
- W3215891836
- Cited by
- 734
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 280 · 2025: 279 · 2024: 141 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 7
- FWCI
- 32.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Medical Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (2p30ag028741-16)
- University of California, San Francisco
- National Institute on Aging (P30‐AG028741, P30AG059303, P30AG059301, P30AG021684, P30AG015272, P30AG022845)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K12HD052023)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Keywords
- effect size estimation, sample size determination, randomized controlled trials, recruitment and retention, intervention fidelity, treatment acceptability, adherence, participant engagement, intervention adaptation, minimally important difference, confidence intervals, nonparametric statistics, design effect
- MeSH terms
- Feasibility Studies, Humans, Pilot Projects, Research Design, Guidelines as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review