The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guidelines for Designing and Evaluating Feasibility Pilot Studies
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Pilot studies test the feasibility of methods and procedures to be used in larger-scale studies. Although numerous articles describe guidelines for the conduct of pilot studies, few have included specific feasibility indicators or strategies for evaluating multiple aspects of feasibility. In addition, using pilot studies to estimate effect sizes to plan sample sizes for subsequent randomized controlled trials has been challenged; however, there has been little consensus on alternative strategies. METHODS: In Section 1, specific indicators (recruitment, retention, intervention fidelity, acceptability, adherence, and engagement) are presented for feasibility assessment of data collection methods and intervention implementation. Section 1 also highlights the importance of examining feasibility when adapting an intervention tested in mainstream populations to a new more diverse group. In Section 2, statistical and design issues are presented, including sample sizes for pilot studies, estimates of minimally important differences, design effects, confidence intervals (CI) and nonparametric statistics. An in-depth treatment of the limits of effect size estimation as well as process variables is presented. Tables showing CI around parameters are provided. With small samples, effect size, completion and adherence rate estimates will have large CI. CONCLUSION: This commentary offers examples of indicators for evaluating feasibility, and of the limits of effect size estimation in pilot studies. As demonstrated, most pilot studies should not be used to estimate effect sizes, provide power calculations for statistical tests or perform exploratory analyses of efficacy. It is hoped that these guidelines will be useful to those planning pilot/feasibility studies before a larger-scale study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, the sample size of the present study falls within the range recommended for pilot studies (Lancaster et al., 2004; Teresi et al., 2022).”
From Evaluation of effectiveness and acceptability of a psychological treatment for smoking cessation combined with a smartphone App: A pilot study (2024) · cites this paper as Teresi et al., 2022
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The study aimed to recruit 80 participants to allow a 25% attrition rate and a final sample of 40 participants, appropriate for pilot feasibility studies (Creswell & Creswell, 2022; Teresi et al., 2022).”
From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Tele-Counselling Program With Care Partners of Persons Living With Dementia: A Pilot Feasibility RCT. (2026) · cites this paper as Teresi et al., 2022
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How we design feasibility studies
Bowen, D. J., Kreuter, M., Spring, B., Cofta-Woerpel, L., Linnan, L., Weiner, D., Bakken, S., Kaplan, C. P., Squiers, L., Fabrizio, C., et al. (2009) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002 · Cited by 4,021
Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., Ader, D., Fries, J. F., Bruce, B., & Rose, M. (2007) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55 · Cited by 3,118
Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study
Julious, S. A. (2005) · Pharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1002/pst.185 · Cited by 3,068
CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials
on behalf of the PAFS consensus group, Eldridge, S. M., Chan, C. L., Campbell, M. J., Bond, C. M., Hopewell, S., Thabane, L., & Lancaster, G. A. (2016) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-016-0105-8 · Cited by 2,843 · cited 1×
“Feasibility indicators can include completion rates and times for speci fi c components, perceived burden, incon-venience, and reasons for noncompletion, 9 all of which may inform assessment protocol modi fi cation.”
BackgroundBellg, A. J., Treatment Fidelity Workgroup of the NIH Behavior Change Consortium, Borrelli, B., Resnick, B., Hecht, J., Minicucci, D. S., Ory, M., Ogedegbe, G., Orwig, D., Ernst, D., et al. (2004) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.23.5.443 · Cited by 2,620
Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice
Lancaster, G. A., Dodd, S., & Williamson, P. R. (2004) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/j..2002.384.doc.x · Cited by 2,572
Revicki, D. A., Hays, R. D., Cella, D. F., & Sloan, J. A. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012 · Cited by 2,384
Whitehead, A. L., Julious, S. A., Cooper, C. L., & Campbell, M. J. (2016) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0962280215588241 · Cited by 1,936
The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research
Leon, A. C., Davis, L. L., & Kraemer, H. C. (2011) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.10.008 · Cited by 1,917
Eldridge, S. M., Lancaster, G. A., Campbell, M. J., Thabane, L., Hopewell, S., Coleman, C. L., & Bond, C. M. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150205 · Cited by 1,581
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Jones, 2016, Differential item functioning in Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) physical functioning short forms, Psychol Test Assess Model, 58, 371
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 733
Hunter, P. V., Wickson‐Griffiths, A., Tupper, S. M., Cammer, A. L., McCleary, L., Kaasalainen, S., Sussman, T., & Thompson, G. N. (2025) · Health & Social Care in the Community · doi:10.1155/hsc/3998877
“Given the pilot study focus, we calculated descriptive statistics (i.e., mean and standard deviation) for the knowledge and general acceptability measures [32].”
Atkin-Jones, T., Ali, M., Eze-Onuorah, A. C. J., Ifeanacho, E., Khosravirad, A., Madden, K., Sadeghirad, B., & Mbuagbaw, L. C. E. (2025) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-025-01655-z
“These findings may indicate that the recent emphasis on feasibility in pilot studies is being increasingly adopted as more specific feasibility indicators, and guidelines are continuously created [18].”
Assessing the Feasibility of the Virtual Reality Training Protocol for Sport
Lewellen, J. A. (2025) · doi:10.33915/etd.12802
Smrithi, L., Mathangi, D. C., & Kantipudi, S. J. (2025) · Journal of Education and Health Promotion · doi:10.4103/jehp.jehp_32_25
“Furthermore, evolution of digital technology has also contributed to the increase in online gaming; most recent work [5] emphasizes the importance of a social perspective when examining video game addiction in adolescents.”
Muollo, V., D’Emanuele, S., Amini, M., Marco, R. D., Cavedon, V., Keating, S. E., Lanceni, M., Setti, M., Benfari, G., Ghiotto, L., et al. (2025) · BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine · doi:10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002667
Pokowitz, E. L., Ye, H., McInnis, M. G., Deldin, P. J., & O’Donnell, L. A. (2025) · American Journal of Psychotherapy · doi:10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20240056
Roponen, J., Ruusunen, A. A., Nuutinen, O., Partonen, T., & Absetz, P. (2025) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114525103565
“The decision was based on practical considerations and pilot study guidelines (45) .”
Perspectives on Starting a Pediatric Spinal Anesthesia Program
Lazar, A., Froyshteter, A. B., Holman, A. E., & Whitaker, E. E. (2025) · Pediatric Anesthesia · doi:10.1111/pan.15141
“Feasibility studies generally recommend sample sizes of 30 or fewer to reach saturation [33].”
Yong, A. S. K., Husna, N., Tan, K. H., Manek, G., Sim, R. R. Y., Loi, R. M. L., Lee, O. Z. J., Tang, S. S., Soon, G. S. T., Chan, D. K. H., et al. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.06.11.25329397
Kim, Y., Tsai, T. C., Steel, J. L., Ramos, A. R., Laurenceau, J., & Troxel, W. (2025) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-025-01671-z
“A total of 12 to 30 participants per study condition is recommended in a feasibility studies focused on recruitment, adherence, and acceptability [75–79].”
Users’ Guide to the Surgical Literature: How to Assess a Pilot Trial in Surgery
Li, G., Bai, X., Lancaster, G., & Thabane, L. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-87083-5_12
Trude, A. C. B., Perry, R., Ingram, R. A., Escobar, K., Ruddock, C., & Figueroa, R. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-6805911/v1
Mastroianni, S., Vinod, A., Xiao, N. G., Johnson, H., Thabane, L., Fang, Q., & Goswami, I. (2025) · NeuroSci · doi:10.3390/neurosci6030060
“The National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health notes that sample size should be based on practical considerations, including participant flow, budgetary constraints, and the number of participants needed to reasonably evaluate feasibility goals [47].”
Pretty, D., Norwood, M. F., Ownsworth, T., Dungey, K., Jones, S. A., Gomes, Z., Clanchy, K., & Kendall, E. A. (2025) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/69452
“Teresi et al [45] described that, in diverse populations, it is imperative to assess the feasibility and acceptability of an intervention before scaling up.”
Naas, A., Sonderegger, A., Ribes, D., Shabestari, P. S., Meyer, M. E., & Neff, P. K. A. (2025) · Proceedings - IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems · doi:10.1109/cbms65348.2025.00189
Levasseur, M.-C., Théroux, J., Lessard, L., Carmel, J., Ouimet, P., Cara-Slavich, S., Vu, A. K., Sylfra, A., Godin-Berthiaume, V., Haddad, É., et al. (2025) · Recherche en soins infirmiers · doi:10.3917/rsi.160.0043
Lapointe, J., Guillaumie, L., Dionne, A. R., Lalonde, L., Lemieux, J., Dorval, M., Nabi, H., Lemay, M., Guénette, L., Guertin, J. R., et al. (2025) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-025-01676-8
“Acceptability and feasibility indicators such as recruitment and retention rates will be evaluated using percentages or means and 95% CI [69].”
Perry, L. M., Peacock, E., LeBlanc, A., Williams, L. G., Wiltz, G. M., & Krousel-Wood, M. A. (2025) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6773.70011
“Based on recommendations for pilot and feasibility studies [24–27], we determined that a sample size of 50 participants would be sufficient for identifying any unanticipated study de-sign problems and for estimating the feasibility outcomes, while also minimizing community burden.”
Hu, J., Mion, L. C., Tan, A., Bartle‐Haring, S., Miller, C. K., & Joseph, J. J. (2025) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2025.108029
“%) group sessions, representing a therapeutic dose [52,53]; ≥85 % of the participants will be able to achieve their developed family goals/plan; and ≥ 90 % of participants will wear the Fitbit activity tracker 5 days/week.”
Córdova, D., Bauermeister, J. A., Warner, S. C., Jiang, Z., Lua, F. M., Khreizat, S., MacLeod, J., Wells, P., Neilands, T. B., Ovadje, L., et al. (2025) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2025.05.017
Matsubara, M. D. G. S., Makdissi, F. B. A., Elias, S., Bergerot, C. D., Ashing, K. T., & Domenico, E. B. L. D. (2025) · Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem · doi:10.1590/1518-8345.7476.4621
Matsubara, M. D. G. S., Makdissi, F. B. A., Elias, S., Bergerot, C. D., Ashing, K. T., & Domenico, E. B. L. D. (2025) · Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem · doi:10.1590/1518-8345.7476.4619
Treatment Summary and Care Plan for Breast Cancer Survivors: acceptability and feasibility study
Matsubara, M. D. G. S., Makdissi, F. B. A., Elias, S., Bergerot, C. D., Ashing, K. T., & Domenico, E. B. L. D. (2025) · Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem · doi:10.1590/1518-8345.7476.4620
Linhares, S. M., D’Aquila, M., Schultz, K. S., & Mongiu, A. K. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.08.01.25332599
Madundo, K., Kwagala, C., Muturi, C., & Makau, P. (2025) · SSM - Mental Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmmh.2025.100505
Paiva, E. M. D. C., Moura, C. D. C., Fonseca, N. D. S. M., & Garcia, A. C. M. (2025) · Advances in Integrative Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.aimed.2025.100559
McMahen, C., Wright, K. E., Jackson, B., Stanton, R., Korman, N., Edoo, A., Bhatt, M., Boyd, C., Luke, J., Wu, J., et al. (2025) · Translational Exercise Biomedicine · doi:10.1515/teb-2025-0018
“There are typically no target sample sizes for e ff ectiveness-implementation trials [21]; however, for pilot trials, sample size goals should be evaluated based on budget constraints and participant fl ow [24].”
Stoodley, C., McKellar, L. V., Fleet, J., Fereday, J. A., Steen, M., Ziaian, T., & Gwilt, I. (2025) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104513
Osaka, W., Aoki, Y., Yonekura, Y., Danya, H., & Nakayama, K. (2025) · PEC Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100425
“The number of participants was calculated based on previous studies that evaluated the acceptability of training programs for HCPs [43].”
Buarque, J. C., Boening, A., Santana, G. C., & Arêas, F. Z. D. S. (2025) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094361
Shrader, C.-H., Robinson, C. L., Hassan, M., Brown, B., Lee, J.-Y., Smith, M. D. R., Latkin, C. A., Schneider, J. A., Ompad, D. C., & Duncan, D. T. (2025) · AIDS Education and Prevention · doi:10.1521/aeap.2025.37.4.288
Bennin, F., Norris, S. A., & Prioreschi, A. (2025) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/76517
“…fidelity (the extent to which an intervention was implemented as designed), acceptability (how well the intervention was received by the target group), adherence (the extent to which the individuals followed the intervention as prescribed), recruitment methods, and user engagement [10].”
Опросник соматической оценки симптомов стресса: первичная психометрическая валидация (II этап)Preprint
Дубинская, А., & Yurova, O. V. (2025) · doi:10.24108/preprints-3113715
Calderón, L. M. P., King, G. A., Labbé, A., Lui, T., Maltais, D. B., Mérette, C., Moffet, H., & McPherson, A. C. (2025) · Developmental Neurorehabilitation · doi:10.1080/17518423.2025.2541830
“42 Health and behavioral outcomes were measured over 12 months at four different times: Time 1 (baseline; prior to randomization), Time 2 (immediately post-intervention; six-months post-randomization), Time 3 (three months post-intervention; nine-months post-randomization) and Time 4 (six months…”
Owen, H., Winter, S., Brown, N., & Legg, H. S. (2025) · International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching · doi:10.1177/17479541251378464
Gnatt, I., Mackelprang, J. L., Phillipou, A., & Nedeljkovic, M. (2025) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2025.100946
Ezzat, A. M., Gibbs, A., Silva, D. D. O., Pazzinatto, M. F., Kemp, J. L., Manski-Nankervis, J.-A. E., & Barton, C. J. (2025) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/s12875-025-02968-x
“In addition to following recommendations made by methodological guidelines for feasibility studies [42, 43], this sample size was determined to be sufficiently large to generate meaningful findings to inform a future larger trial, as well as being pragmatic based on the research teams resources and…”
Preston, R., Christmass, M. A., Zhou, H., McGough, S., & Heslop, K. (2025) · Drugs Education Prevention and Policy · doi:10.1080/09687637.2025.2566007
“This study assessed the use of a screen cup intervention in facilitating the recruitment of CPOP clients to a nurse-led HCV clinic to undergo HCV screening, focusing on acceptability and feasibility outcomes (Teresi et al., 2022).”
InfluentialBernard, S., Perreault, K., Pepin, D., Gauthier, L. R., Roy-Richard, C., Lamontagne, M., Dalzell, M.-A., & McNeely, M. L. (2025) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076251382088
“58 Although the primary objective of this study is to assess the feasibility of the PHRP, a secondary objective is to explore its preliminary effectiveness.”
Financial reimbursement for clinical trial participation costs: A pilot feasibility study.
Williams, C., Henderson, N. L., Jahan, N., Stringer-Reasor, E., Azuero, A., Pisu, M., Arend, R. C., & Rocque, G. B. (2025) · JNCI Cancer Spectrum · doi:10.1093/jncics/pkag048
“44,45 For qualitative analyses, the sample size was sufficient for meeting theoretical saturation and appropriate for this study.”
Otai, J., Ekakoro, N., Masaba, H., & Nvumetta, R. (2025) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-025-24233-7 · Cited by 3
“This pilot study aimed to assess whether the scales performed as expected and were suitable for the study population, as well as to test the feasibility of the data collection process [65].”
Yazd, S. M. M., Keramati, M. R., Ghalerudkhani, M. G., Shahriarirad, R., Parsa, A., & Keshvari, A. (2025) · Health Science Reports · doi:10.1002/hsr2.71351
“Nevertheless, the current sample size was appropriate for assessing feasibility [21, 22].”
Managing fatigue in Parkinson's disease: Preparing for a randomized controlled trial
Alizadeh, N. S., Packer, T. L., Sturkenboom, I. H. W. M., Warner, G., & Rigby, H. (2025) · Journal of Parkinson s Disease · doi:10.1177/1877718x251388329
“26,27 This study is part of the fi rst author ’ s manuscript-based dissertation, which was published by Dalhousie University.”
Hadebe, S. G., Hajat, A., & Hazell, L. J. (2025) · Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences · doi:10.1002/jmrs.70031
“Prior to distribution to the students, a pilot study involving 18 fourth-year diagnostic student radiographers in 2022 was conducted to assess the appropriateness, relevance and accuracy [12].”
Chumba, S. J. (2025) · Journal of Education Management and Leadership · doi:10.51317/ecjeml.v6i1.641
Abaszade, Z., Karimova, J. R., Mammadzada, A. Y., th, A. H. A., Ismayilova, S., & th, S. G. G. (2025) · doi:10.2196/preprints.86565
Orchard, D., Bolt, D., Pinna, T., & Antoni-Pineda, G. (2025) · International journal of osteopathic medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ijosm.2025.100795
Termannsen, A., Bjerre, N., Hansen, G. S., Jalking, L., Færch, K., Hempler, N. F., Quist, J. S., & Varming, A. R. (2025) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-025-01715-4
“Sixteen participants were considered sufficient to obtain insights into the intervention feasibility in terms of recruitment, retention, intervention fidelity, acceptability, and adherence in a non-randomised single-arm pilot study [25].”
Tsai, Y.-F., Chen, P.-C., & Lin, K. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology · doi:10.1097/mcg.0000000000002278
MacGregor, F., Breckons, M., & Swainston, K. (2025) · Radiography · doi:10.1016/j.radi.2025.103223
Yoshikane, T., Yamasaki, T., Uchimura, M., Kambara, M., & Hayashi, K. (2025) · Operative Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/ons.0000000000001847
Roberts, B., Cooper, Z., Miljevic, A., Stanley, S. H., Majda, B. T., Collins, K. R. L., Baltic, S., Lindsey-Temple, S., Akkari, P. A., Hood, S. D., et al. (2025) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103644 · Cited by 1
Graetz, I., Arshad, S., Cai, C., Hernandez, S., Sapir, T., Carter, J., Heggen, C. L., McKinnon, K. E., Yang, F., Sadigh, G., et al. (2025) · JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics · doi:10.1200/cci-25-00152
“19”
Zhai, B., Liu, X., Fu, J., Xie, K., Zhu, X., & Li, J. (2025) · Geriatric Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.gerinurse.2025.103713
You, J., Khan, Z., Swaroop, R., Sun, Y., Velayudhan, L., & Aarsland, D. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0336583
“As recommended in guidelines for feasibility studies [66], these studies should not be used to estimate effect sizes, perform exploratory analyses of efficacy, or provide power calculations for statistical tests.”
Youssef, M., Clay, S., Zaref, C., Harris, V. S., Clay, E., & Muchira, J. M. (2025) · The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · doi:10.1097/jcn.0000000000001257
Rich, E. M., Vas, A., Evetts, C. L., Kaplan-Smith, G., & Goodman, B. P. (2025) · Neurorehabilitation · doi:10.1177/10538135251395291
“In such cases, we relied on prior literature, previously described analyses, and clinical judgment to interpret relevance (Molino et al., 2022; Teresi et al., 2022) (cid:129) Additionally, qualitative feedback from participants supported perceived bene fi t and acceptability, further underscoring…”
Rizal, H. P., Rahmadhani, A., Aira, C. D., & Tambing, A. A. (2025) · Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.24042/ijsme.v8i2.28659
Rizal, H. P., Rahmadhani, A., Aira, C. D., & Tambing, A. A. (2025) · Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.24042/ijsme.v8i3.28659
Nielsen, S. S., Christensen, J. R., Tang, L. H., Simonÿ, C., Skejø, S. D., & Skou, S. T. (2025) · Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies · doi:10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.09.028
Hussain, I., Xu, S., Dong, Y., Rasool, M. F., Ullah, J., Khan, A., Kadirhaz, M., Xu, M., Tang, C., Zhao, W. G., et al. (2025) · BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/s12879-025-12246-x
“…for recruiting 30 participants for each arm (total n = 60), consistent with recommendations from methodological recommendations for pilot trials [25–27], which suggests sample sizes of approximately 12 to 35 participants per arm for pilot trials are typically sufficient to provide stable…”
Djukic, M., Miller, D. L., Hermosilla, A. M., Hulsey, S., & Pine, R. (2025) · Western Journal of Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/01939459251395389
“We designed this pilot feasibility study 34 to assess the feasibility of a nursing pipeline program involving high school students enrolled in CTE programs.”
Savva, G. M., Ponsero, A. J., Adriaenssens, E. M., Hildebrand, F., & Carding, S. R. (2025) · Springer protocols handbooks/Springer protocols · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-5009-7_2
Mura, M., Portugal, B., Mouton, C., Grimm, B. P., Seil, R., & Malisoux, L. (2025) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-025-01744-z
“This protocol has been designed according to previously established guidelines [42].”
Nielsen, E. S., Kallesøe, K. H., Frostholm, L., Jønsson, I. M., Johansen, K. B., Lalouni, M., Bonnert, M., & Rask, C. U. (2026) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2026.100941 · Cited by 1
Saker, M., Dayekh, A., Alrayshouni, Z., El‐Tassi, A., & Pakai, A. (2025) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-025-04180-9
“This research underscores the significance of evaluating the practicality of implementing an educational intervention that has been successful in traditional settings and adapting it to a more diverse population [27, 28].”
Whitt‐Woosley, A., Sprang, G., & Gusler, S. (2025) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-025-03240-7
“Key domains of inter - est were established a priori based on the distinctive features of feasibility investigations and were used to develop the questions for the exit survey (National Institute for Health Research, 2012 ; Teresi et al., 2022 ).”
Steinberg, J. S., Toh, S. H. Y., Mair, P., & Weisz, J. R. (2025) · Child and Adolescent Mental Health · doi:10.1111/camh.70057
Morton, E. E., Kcomt, A., & Michalak, E. E. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0338306
“As per recommendations for pilot and feasibility studies, descriptive statistics will be used to characterise feasibility and acceptability [40,67].”
Skliarova, T., Pedersen, H., Holsbrekken, Å., Pedersen, S. A., Mandal, A., Cuevas, C. D. L., Havnen, A., Gråwe, R. W., & Lara‐Cabrera, M. L. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26074291
Skliarova, T., Pedersen, H., Holsbrekken, Å., Pedersen, S. A., Mandal, A., Cuevas, C. D. L., Havnen, A., Gråwe, R. W., & Lara‐Cabrera, M. L. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26736981
Self‐Brown, S., Perry, E. W., Recinos, M., Cotner, M. A., Guastaferro, K., Owolabi, S., Spears, C. A., Whitaker, D. J., Huang, J., & Kegler, M. C. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26589048
Skliarova, T., Pedersen, H., Holsbrekken, Å., Pedersen, S. A., Mandal, A., Cuevas, C. D. L., Havnen, A., Gråwe, R. W., & Lara‐Cabrera, M. L. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26736987
Bailey, D. P., Harper, J. H., Kilbride, C., McGowan, L. J., Victor, C., Brierley, M. L., & Chater, A. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26974507
Worboys, H., Gray, L., Anthony, S., Hobson, R., Lucas, T. C. D., & Ng, A. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.27019223
Hebda-Boon, A., Shortland, A. P., Birn‐Jeffery, A. V., & Morrissey, D. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.25824741
Bailey, D. P., Harper, J. H., Kilbride, C., McGowan, L. J., Victor, C., Brierley, M. L., & Chater, A. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26974519
Park, S., Lee, S., Woo, S., Webster, K., Chen, W., Veliz, P., & Larson, J. L. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26758105
Bailey, D. P., Harper, J. H., Kilbride, C., McGowan, L. J., Victor, C., Brierley, M. L., & Chater, A. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26974510
Skliarova, T., Pedersen, H., Holsbrekken, Å., Pedersen, S. A., Mandal, A., Cuevas, C. D. L., Havnen, A., Gråwe, R. W., & Lara‐Cabrera, M. L. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26736984
Skliarova, T., Pedersen, H., Holsbrekken, Å., Pedersen, S. A., Mandal, A., Cuevas, C. D. L., Havnen, A., Gråwe, R. W., & Lara‐Cabrera, M. L. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26074063
Hebda-Boon, A., Shortland, A. P., Birn‐Jeffery, A. V., & Morrissey, D. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.25824814
Park, S., Lee, S., Woo, S., Webster, K., Chen, W., Veliz, P., & Larson, J. L. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26758108
Bailey, D. P., Harper, J. H., Kilbride, C., McGowan, L. J., Victor, C., Brierley, M. L., & Chater, A. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26974516
Self‐Brown, S., Perry, E. W., Recinos, M., Cotner, M. A., Guastaferro, K., Owolabi, S., Spears, C. A., Whitaker, D. J., Huang, J., & Kegler, M. C. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26589045
Worboys, H., Gray, L., Anthony, S., Hobson, R., Lucas, T. C. D., & Ng, A. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.27019220
A preliminary investigation on digital surveillance literacy among dental academicians
Shukla, B., Panda, A., & Chari, D. N. (2025) · Revista Facultad de Odontología Universidad de Antioquia · doi:10.17533/udea.rfo.v37n2e361036
Liu, Y., Mahidin, F. B. A. M. @., & bin Ismail, H. (2025) · International Conference on Management Science and Computer Engineering (MSCE) · doi:10.1145/3760023.3760063
“To ensure data accuracy, pilot studies serve as an effective instrument test, and their outcomes will inform subsequent data analysis in this research [18].”
Gitlin, L. N., & Czaja, S. J. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-21664-0.00012-x
Stanmore, E., Fisher, K., Dewick, P. M., Choi, N., & Munford, L. A. (2025) · doi:10.2196/preprints.84368
Sarkar, N., Tate, J. A., Tauseef, M., Ullal, A., Maxwell, C. A., Juckett, L., Scharre, D. W., Tan, A., Zhang, R., Ingram, Z., et al. (2025) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/83864
“Feasibility, defined as the practicality of conducting the study [64], was measured by observation and documentation of recruitment and retention rates, data completion, and session attendance (ie, intervention completion).”
Strong, Positive, and Resilient Kids (SPARK): Adaptation and Pilot of a Youth Wellness Program
Gerdes, A. C., & Scott, L. N. (2025) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-025-03246-1 · Cited by 1
“Feasibility of SPARK was determined by employ - ing pilot study guidelines related to the examination of data collection protocols, the maintenance of fidelity to the pro - gram, and the adherence and retention of students (Teresi et al., 2022).”
InfluentialTsele-Tebakang, T. (2025) · International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ijans.2025.100960
Cruz-Oliver, D. M., Blinka, M. D., Sloan, D. H., Saylor, M. A., Reyes, J., Akid, I., Park, T., & Phongtankuel, V. (2025) · Hispanic Health Care International · doi:10.1177/15404153251407300
“This pilot study examined feasibility and acceptability; therefore, it was not appropriate to assess the effect sizes of the intervention (Teresi et al., 2022) due to small sample size.”
Enhancing Self-Regulated Learning Through an Academic Self-Regulation Program and Mobile App
Ham, P. (2025) · OTJR Occupational Therapy Journal of Research · doi:10.1177/15394492251400292
Adhikari, S. P., McLennan, C., Kriitmaa, K., Rothlander, K., Mason, K., & van Donkelaar, P. (2025) · Women s Health Reports · doi:10.1177/26884844251405060
“12,28,29 Feedback and anecdotal information.”
Cherry, J., Nelson, A. M., Robinson, L. A., Goldstein, J., Vives‐Rodriguez, A., Sharp, E. S., & Tinaz, S. (2026) · Neuropsychological Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09602011.2025.2608220
“We determined the total sample size of 30 participants (15 in each group) in this pilot trial based on pragmatic considerations regarding recruitment within the set timeframe and budget constraints (Teresi et al., 2022).”
Guerreiro, E., Souza, G., Mendes, J. J., Manso, A. C., & Botelho, J. (2026) · Dentistry Journal · doi:10.3390/dj14010031
“According to current methodological guidelines, pilot studies aiming to test procedures or acceptability may adequately operate with samples of around 30 participants, as they are not intended to estimate effect sizes or perform inferential analyses [20,21].”
Monfared, M., & Murphy, P. J. (2026) · Translational Vision Science & Technology · doi:10.1167/tvst.15.1.3
“31,32 In the present study, each participant underwent repeated testing across multiple IBIs and ocular surface locations, generating a large number of individual measurements.”
Wang, J., Chang, Y., Wei, X., Cao, Y. H., & Winkley, K. (2026) · Maternal and Child Nutrition · doi:10.1111/mcn.70155
Metadata
- Authors
- Teresi, J. A., Yu, X., Stewart, A. L., & Hays, R. D.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew Home (US)
- The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Teresi, Jeanne A.
- ORCID
- Hays, Ron D.
- Venue
- Medical Care
- Published
- 2021-11-23
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 95-103
- ISSN
- 0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8849521
- OpenAlex
- W3215891836
- Cited by
- 734
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 280 · 2025: 279 · 2024: 141 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 7
- FWCI
- 32.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Medical Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (2p30ag028741-16)
- University of California, San Francisco
- National Institute on Aging (P30‐AG028741, P30AG059303, P30AG059301, P30AG021684, P30AG015272, P30AG022845)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K12HD052023)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Keywords
- effect size estimation, sample size determination, randomized controlled trials, recruitment and retention, intervention fidelity, treatment acceptability, adherence, participant engagement, intervention adaptation, minimally important difference, confidence intervals, nonparametric statistics, design effect
- MeSH terms
- Feasibility Studies, Humans, Pilot Projects, Research Design, Guidelines as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review