Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 770

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Obesity and the human microbiome

Ley, Ruth E·2010·Current Opinion in Gastroenterology

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Obesity was once rare, but the last few decades have seen a rapid expansion of the proportion of obese individuals worldwide. Recent work has shown obesity to be associated with a shift in the representation of the dominant phyla of bacteria in the gut, both in humans and animal models. This review summarizes the latest research into the association between microbial ecology and host adiposity, and the mechanisms by which microbes in the gut may mediate host metabolism in the context of obesity. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies of the effect of excess body fat on the abundances of different bacteria taxa in the gut generally show alterations in the gastrointestinal microbiota, and changes during weight loss. The gastrointestinal microbiota have been shown to impact insulin resistance, inflammation, and adiposity via interactions with epithelial and endocrine cells. SUMMARY: Large-scale alterations of the gut microbiota and its microbiome (gene content) are associated with obesity and are responsive to weight loss. Gut microbes can impact host metabolism via signaling pathways in the gut, with effects on inflammation, insulin resistance, and deposition of energy in fat stores. Restoration of the gut microbiota to a healthy state may ameliorate the conditions associated with obesity and help maintain a healthy weight.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mog.0b013e328333d751

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Turnbaugh, 2009, Nature, 457, 480, 10.1038/nature07540 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Collado, 2008, Am J Clin Nutr, 88, 894, 10.1093/ajcn/88.4.894 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Sotos, 2008, Proc Nutrition Soc, 67, E20, 10.1017/S0029665108006290 · DOI
  4. Duncan, 2008, Int J Obesity, 32, 1720, 10.1038/ijo.2008.155 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Kalliomaki, 2008, Am J Clin Nutr, 87, 534, 10.1093/ajcn/87.3.534 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Nadal, 2009, Int J Obesity, 33, 758, 10.1038/ijo.2008.260 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Sabate, 2008, Obesity Surg, 18, 371, 10.1007/s11695-007-9398-2 · DOI
  8. Turnbaugh, 2009, J Physiol, 587, 4153, 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.174136 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Guo, 2008, Lett Appl Microbiol, 47, 367, 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02408.x · DOI · Paper page
  10. Mozes, 2008, Obesity, 16, 2610, 10.1038/oby.2008.435 · DOI
  11. Mozes, 2008, Folia Microbiol (Praha), 53, 225, 10.1007/s12223-008-0031-0 · doi:10.1007/s12223-008-0031-0
  12. Turnbaugh, 2008, Cell Host Microbe, 3, 213, 10.1016/j.chom.2008.02.015 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Waldram, 2009, J Proteome Res, 8, 2361, 10.1021/pr8009885 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Crawford, 2009, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 27, 11276, 10.1073/pnas.0902366106 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Goodson, 2009, J Dent Res, 88, 519, 10.1177/0022034509338353 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Reinhardt, 2009, J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 48, 249, 10.1097/MPG.0b013e318183187c · DOI · Paper page
  17. Mandard, 2006, J Biol Chem, 281, 934, 10.1074/jbc.M506519200 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Staiger, 2008, Diabetes, 53, 579
  19. Hotamisligil, 1996, Science, 271, 665, 10.1126/science.271.5249.665 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Cani, 2007, Diabetes, 56, 1761, 10.2337/db06-1491 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Tsukumo, 2007, Diabetes, 56, 1886, 10.2337/db06-1595 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Yang, 2006, PLoS Med, 3, e287, 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030287 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Scheja, 2008, Exp Diabetes Res, 2008, 230837, 10.1155/2008/230837 · DOI
  24. Reigstad, 2009, PLoS ONE, 4, e5842, 10.1371/journal.pone.0005842 · DOI
  25. Amar, 2008, Am J Clin Nutr, 87, 1219, 10.1093/ajcn/87.5.1219 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Ma, 2008, J Hepatol, 49, 821, 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.05.025 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Cani, 2007, Diabetologia, 50, 2374, 10.1007/s00125-007-0791-0 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Cani, 2009, Gut, 58, 1091, 10.1136/gut.2008.165886 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Drucker, 1999, Trends Endocrinol Metab, 10, 153, 10.1016/S1043-2760(98)00136-2 · DOI
  30. Uribe, 1994, Gastroenterology, 107, 1259, 10.1016/0016-5085(94)90526-6 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Bates, 2006, Dev Biol, 297, 374, 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.05.006 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Cani, 2007, Br J Nutr, 98, 32, 10.1017/S0007114507691648 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Ishida, 2007, Obesity Surg, 17, 756, 10.1007/s11695-007-9139-6 · DOI
  34. Woodard, 2009, J Gastrointest Surg, 13, 1198, 10.1007/s11605-009-0891-x · DOI

Cited by

See all 770

Metadata

Authors
Ley, R. E.
Venue
Current Opinion in Gastroenterology
Published
2010-01
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
5-11
ISSN
0267-1379 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127013413
Cited by
770
References
19
FWCI
16.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Obesity and the human microbiome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/mog.0b013e328333d751
The paper
Ley, R. E. (2010). Obesity and the human microbiome. Current Opinion in Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1097/mog.0b013e328333d751

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.