Cited by 40Cancer survivorship and careWomen's cancer prevention and managementFamily Support in Illness

Effects of a Psychoeducational Versus a Support Group Intervention in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Schou Bredal, Inger, Kåresen, Rolf, Smeby, Nina Aarhus, Espe, Randi, Sørensen, Elin Myklebust, Amundsen, Mette, Aas, Hans, Ekeberg, Øivind·2014·Cancer Nursing

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Limited documentation exists on the effectiveness of psychoeducational group (PEG) versus support group (SG) interventions among breast cancer patients during primary care. Support group is a component of the hospitals' routine breast cancer care. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate which of these approaches provides the greatest benefits to participants, particularly to women with low optimism (pessimists). The primary outcomes investigated here were anxiety, depression, and mental adjustment to cancer. METHODS: A total of 367 women with early-stage breast cancer were randomized to the PEG or SG intervention starting 1 to 8 weeks after surgery. The PEG intervention included health education, enhancement of problem-solving skills, stress management, and psychological support. RESULTS: Participants in both groups showed improvement over time; however, no significant differences in emotional distress were found. The PEG participants exhibited more positive attitude at 2 and 6 months (P < .001) and less helplessness/hopelessness (P = .01) at 2 months compared with the SG participants. However, no significant differences were found between the groups at 12 months. Pessimists did not benefit more from attending the PEG than they did from attending the SG. CONCLUSION: Both groups showed improvement in emotional distress and coping over time. Although the results were limited, the PEG intervention seems to enhance short-term, but not long-term, adaptive coping. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Psychoeducational group intervention yields benefits during the difficult period when patients receive adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Thus, the hospital's standard group interventions have been changed to include more health education and stress management, but within the same time frame as the original SG.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ncc.0b013e31829879a3

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Distress is the most potent factor related to the quality of life by influencing the patient's cognitive attitudes and abilities towards illness.

    “Distress is the most potent factor related to the quality of life by influencing the patient's cognitive attitudes and abilities towards illness [75].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schou Bredal, I., Kåresen, R., Smeby, N. A., Espe, R., Sørensen, E. M., Amundsen, M., Aas, H., & Ekeberg, Ø.
Affiliations
Oslo University Hospital (NO)
Venue
Cancer Nursing
Published
2014-05
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
198-207
ISSN
0162-220X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2314639901
Cited by
40
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
early breast cancer, group psychoeducation, pessimism, optimism, anxiety, depression, mental adjustment to cancer, coping, helplessness, hopelessness, stress management, health education, problem-solving skills, primary care
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Help Groups, Stress, Psychological, Directive Counseling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review