Cited by 75Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationInnovations in Medical EducationArtificial Intelligence in Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of Artificial Intelligence Course in Nursing on Students' Medical Artificial Intelligence Readiness: A Comparative Quasi-Experimental Study

Taskiran, Nihal·2023·Nurse Educator

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is predicted that artificial intelligence (AI) will transform nursing across all domains of nursing practice, including administration, clinical care, education, policy, and research. PURPOSE: This study examined the impact of an AI course in the nursing curriculum on students' medical AI readiness. DESIGN AND METHODS: This comparative quasi-experimental study was conducted with a total of 300 3rd-year nursing students, 129 in the control group and 171 in the experimental group. Students in the experimental group received 28 hours of AI training. The students in the control group were not given any training. Data were collected by a socio-demographic form and the Medical Artificial Intelligence Readiness Scale. RESULTS: An AI course should be included in the nursing curriculum, according to 67.8% of students in the experimental group and 57.4% of students in the control group. The mean score of the experimental group on medical AI readiness was higher ( P < .05) and the effect size of the course on readiness was -0.29. CONCLUSIONS: An AI nursing course positively affects students' readiness for medical AI.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nne.0000000000001446

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Josea, 2022, Artificial intelligence and nursing, Spec Educ, 1, 6234
  2. Akyüz, 2021, Sağlık hizmetleri meslek yüksek okulu öğrencilerinin yapay zeka hakkında bilgi düzeylerinin incelenmesi, Med Res Reports, 4, 28
  3. Öcal, 2020, Tıp fakültesi öğrencilerinin tıpta yapay zeka ile ilgili düşünceleri, Türk Tıp Öğrencileri Araştırma Dergisi, 2, 9
  4. Harman, 2012, Eğitimde hazir bulunuşluğun önemi üzerine bir derleme çalişmasi, J Res Educ Teach, 1, 147

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Taskiran, N.
Affiliations
Assistant Professor, Department of Fundamentals of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey.
Venue
Nurse Educator
Published
2023-05-02
Volume
48
Issue
5
Pages
E147-E152
ISSN
  • 0363-3624 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-9855
OpenAlex
W4367834363
Cited by
75
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 1
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nurse Educator (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence in nursing, nursing curriculum, nursing students, AI readiness, nursing education
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Curriculum, Educational Measurement, Humans, Students, Medical, Students, Nursing, Nursing Education Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review